Fear and stress reactions in two species of duck and their hybrid

Hormones and Behavior

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 568-572

  Faure, J M ^a   Val Laillet, D ^b   Guy, G ^c   Bernadet, Marie Dominique ^c   Guemene D ^a  

^a STATION DE RECHERCHES AVICOLES   (France)

^b UMR85 PHYSIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION ET DES COMPORTEMENTS   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTERONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADRENAL GLAND; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL GENETICS; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUCK; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FEAR; FEMALE; HEREDITY; HETEROSIS; HORMONE DETERMINATION; HYBRID; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TONIC IMMOBILITY;

EID: 0038512243     PISSN: 0018506X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0018-506X(03)00062-X     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baptista L.F., Trail P.W., Horblit H.M. Order columbiformes. del Hoyo I., Helliot A., Sargatal J. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 4:1997;60-243 Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
2. Belyaev D.K. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. J. Hered. 70:1979;301-306.
3. Bignami G. Selection for high rates and low rates of avoidance conditioning in the rat. Anim. Behav. 13:1965;221-227.
4. Boyer, J.P., Melin, J.M., Ferré, R., 1970. Différences génétiques de comportement exploratoire expérimental chez le poussin. Premiers résultats. 14th World Poultry Congress, Madrid, Vol. 2, pp. 21-25.
5. Boyer J.P., Melin J.M., Bourdens P. Activity test in young pheasants. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 5:1973;417-418.
6. Broadhurst P.L. Experiments in psychogenetics application of biometrical genetics to inheritance of behaviour . Heisenk H. Experiments in Personality. I Psychogenetics and Psychopharmacology. 1960;1-102 Routledge and Kegan, London.
7. Brown K.I., Nestor K.E. Implications of selection for high and low adrenal response to stress. Poult. Sci. 53:1974;1297-1306.
8. Bruell J.H. Inheritance of behavioral and physiological characters of mice and the problem of heterosis. Am. Zool. 4:1964;125-138.
9. Carboneras C. Anseriformes. del Hoyo I., Helliot A., Sargatal J. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1:1992;527-628 Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
10. De Fries J.C., Gervais M.C., Thomas E.A. Response to 30 generations of selection for open-field activity in mice. Behav. Genet. 8:1978;3-13.
11. Dilger W.C. The behaviour of lovebirds. Sci. Am. 206:1962;88-98.
12. Etches R.J. Radioimmunoassay for corticosterone and its application to the measurement of stress in poultry. Steroids. 28:1976;763-773.
13. Fairfull R.W. Heterosis. Crawford R.D. Poultry Breeding and Genetics. 1990;913-933 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
14. Faure, J.M., Bessei, W., Jones, R.B., 2003. Direct selection for improved animal well-being, in: Muir, W., and Aggrey, S. (Eds.), Poultry Breeding and Biotechnology, CABI, Wallingford, UK, p. 221-245.
15. Faure J.M., Folmer J.C. Etude génétique de l'activité précoce en open-field du jeune poussin. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim. 7:1975;123-132.
16. Faure J.M., Jones R.B., Bessei W. Fear and social motivation as factors in open-field behaviour of the domestic chick. Behav. Biol. 8:1983;103-116.
17. Gallup G.G. Jr. Genetic influence on tonic immobility in chickens. Anim. Learn. Behav. 2:1974;145-147.
18. Gobin, E., 2000. Caractéristiques des réponses comportementales et physiologiques de canards mulards mâles en fonction de leur génotype et/ou phénotype. Mémoire MST., Univ. Tours, 31 pp.
19. Gross W.B., Siegel P.B. Selective breeding of chickens for corticosterone response to social stress. Poult. Sci. 64:1985;2230-2233.
20. Guémené, D., Guy, G., Destombes, N., Garreau-Mills, M., Faure, J.M., 1998. Aptitude physiologique du canard mulard mâle à répondre à un stress aigu pendant la période de gavage. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras. Bordeaux, pp. 63-68.
21. Guémené D., Guy G., Noirault J., Garreau-Mills M., Gouraud P., Faure J.M. Force-feeding procedure and physiological indicators of stress in male mule ducks. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:2001;650-657.
22. Guémené, D., Fournel, E., Faure, J.M., Guy, G., 2003. Effets génotype phénotype, âge et du mode d'élevage sur les réponses comportementales et physiologiques du canard mulard, in: Baudoin, C. (Ed.), L'Éthologe Appliquée Aujourd'hui. Editions Ed, Paris, p. 65-72.
23. Jones R.B., Faure J.M. Tonic immobility ("righting time") in the domestic fowl. Effects of various methods of induction. IRCS Med. Res. 8:1980;184-185.
24. Jones R.B., Mills A.D. Estimation of fear in two lines of the domestic chick correlations between various methods . Behav. Process. 8:1983;243-253.
25. Jones R.B., Satterlee D.G., Ryder F.H. Fear and distress in Japanese quail chicks of two lines genetically selected for low or high plasma corticosterone response to immobilization stress. Horm. Behav. 26:1992;385-393.
26. Jones R.B., Satterlee D.G., Ryder F.H. Open-field behaviour of Japanese quail chicks selected for low or high plasma corticosterone response to immobilisation stress. Poult. Sci. 71:1992;1403-1407.
27. Jones R.B., Mills A.D., Faure J.M., Williams J.B. Restraint, fear and distress in Japanese quail genetically selected for long or short tonic immobility reactions. Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;529-534.
28. Lade B., Thorpe W.H. Dove songs as innately coded patterns of specific behaviour. Nature. 202:1964;66-68.
29. Launay, F., 1993. Conséquences comportementales et physiologiques de sélections pour l'émotivité et l'attraction sociale chez la caille japonaise. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Rennes, France, 167 pp.
30. Leroy Y. Etude du chant de deux espèces de grillons et leur hybride (Grillus comodus Walker, Grillus oceanicus Le Guillou, Orthoptères). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris. 256:1963;3223-3226.
31. Mignon-Grasteau, S., Beaumont, C., Poivey, J.P., de Rochambeau, H., 1997. Genetic parameters of sexual dimorphism. Proceedings of the 12th Aviagen Symposium, Pruhonice (Czech Republic), September 1-3, pp. 152-152.
32. Mignon-Grasteau, S., Delaby, C., Roussot, O., Faure, J.M., Mills, A.D., Leterrier, C., Guémené, G., Constantin, P., Mills, M., Lepape, G., Beaumont, C., 2002. Factorial component analysis of fear related behaviour traits in Japanese quail. Behav. Process 61, 69-75.
33. Mills A.D., Faure J.M. The estimation of fear in domestic quail correlations between various methods and measures . Biol. Behav. 11:1986;235-243.
34. Mills A.D., Faure J.M. Divergent selection for duration of tonic immobility and social reinstatement behavior in japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) chicks. J. Comp. Psychol. 105:1991;25-38.
35. Mills A.D., Faure J.M. Ease of capture in lines of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) subjected to contrasting selection for fear or sociality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69:2000;125-134.
36. Noirault J., Guémené D., Guy G., Faure J.M. Corticosterone plasma concentration in male mule ducks effect of sampling sites, repeated sampling and ACTH injections . Br. Poult. Sci. 40:1999;304-308.
37. Remignon H., Mills A.D., Guémené D., Desrosiers V., Garreau-Mills M., Marché M., Marché G. Meat quality traits and muscle parameters in high or low fear lines of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) subjected to acute stress. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:1998;372-378.
38. ème Journées de la recherche sur les palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, (F), October 4-5, pp. 25-28.
39. Satterlee D.G., Johnson W.A. Selection of japanese quail for contrasting blood corticosterone response to immobilization. Poult. Sci. 67:1988;25-32.
40. Siegel P.B. Some thoughts on poultry behavior. Siegel P.B., Bessei W., Grauvogl A. Verhaltenmerkmale bei der Zûchtung von Geflûgel. Vol. 93:1978;25-34 Hohenheimer Arbeiten, Verlag Eugen Ulmer.
41. Tai C., Rouvier R. Cross breeding effect on sexual dimorphism of body weight in intergeneric hybrids obtained between muscovy and pekin duck. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30:1998;163-170.
42. Vuillaume, A., Tounut, J., 1982. Une nouvelle technique de prélèvement de sang chez les palmipèdes et les autres volailles. Groupement des Techniques Vétérinaires, 82 AV-013, pp. 83-87.