|
Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 471-479
|
Cervical screening in England and Wales: Its effect has been underestimated
|
Author keywords
Carcinoma in situ; Carcinoma of the uterine cervix; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3; Cervical screening; Cohort effect; Incidence; Risk of disease
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CANCER INVASION;
CANCER SCREENING;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
EARLY DIAGNOSIS;
FEMALE;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
PERCEPTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;
UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGE FACTORS;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
CHILD;
CHILD, PRESCHOOL;
COHORT STUDIES;
DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY;
ENGLAND;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INCIDENCE;
INFANT;
MASS SCREENING;
MIDDLE AGED;
REGISTRIES;
UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;
WALES;
|
EID: 0034524818
PISSN: 09565507
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00272.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (23)
|
References (24)
|