Barrier method preferences and perceptions among Zimbabwean women and their partners

AIDS and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 415-422

  Buck, Jessica ^a,e   Kang, Mi Suk ^b   Van Der Straten, Ariane ^b   Khumalo Sakutukwa, Gertrude ^c   Posner, Samuel ^d   Padian, Nancy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UZ UCSF Collaborative Program in Women's Health   (Zimbabwe)

^d CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Barrier methods; Condoms; Contraception; Diaphragm; Female controlled methods; HIV prevention

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BARRIER CONTRACEPTION; CONDOM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION RISK; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION; PREVALENCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; UTERINE CERVIX CAP; ZIMBABWE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDOMS; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES, FEMALE; FEMALE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL PARTNERS; ZIMBABWE;

EID: 32144435116     PISSN: 10907165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-005-9013-2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AIDS Epidemic Update 2003. (2003). Geneva: © Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO) 2003.
2. Bulut, A., Ortayli, N., Ringheim, K., Cottingham, J., Farley, T. M., Peregoudov, A., et al. (2001). Assessing the acceptability, service delivery requirements, and use-effectiveness of the diaphragm in Colombia, Philippines, and Turkey. Contraception, 63(5), 267-275.
3. Cabral, R. J., Posner, S. F., Macaluso, M., Artz, L. M., Johnson, C., and Pulley, L. (2003). Do main partner conflict, power dynamics, and control over use of male condoms predict subsequent use of the female condom? Women Health, 38(1), 37-52.
4. Cecil, H., Perry, M. J., Seal, D. W., and Pinkerton, S. D. (1998). The Female Condom: What We Have Learned Thus Far. AIDS & Behavior, 2(3), 241-256.
5. Civic, D., and Wilson, D. (1996). Dry sex in Zimbabwe and implications for condom use. Soc Sci Med, 42(1), 91-98.
6. Di Giacomo do Lago, T., Barbosa, R. M., Kalckmann, S., Villela, W. V., and Gohiman, S. (1995). Acceptability of the Diaphragm among Low-Income Women in Sao Paulo, Brazil. International Family Planning Perspectives, 21(3), 114-118.
7. Elias, C., and Coggins, C. (2001). Acceptability research on female-controlled barrier methods to prevent heterosexual transmission of HIV: Where have we been? Where are we going? J Womens Health Gend Based Med, 10(2), 163-173.
8. Ellertson, C., and Burns, M. (2003). Re-examining the Role of Cervical Barrier Devices. OUTLOOK, 20(2), 1-8.
9. Fontanet, A. L., Saba, J., Chandelying, V., Sakondhavat, C., Bhiraleus, P., Rugpao, S., et al. (1998). Protection against sexually transmitted diseases by granting sex workers in Thailand the choice of using the male or female condom: results from a randomized controlled trial. Aids, 12(14), 1851-1859.
10. French, P. P., Latka, M., Gollub, E. L., Rogers, C., Hoover, D. R., and Stein, Z. A. (2003). Use-effectiveness of the female versus male condom in preventing sexually transmitted disease in women. Sex Transm Dis, 30(5), 433-439.
11. Gollub, E. L., French, P., Latka, M., Rogers, C., and Stein, Z. (2001). Achieving safer sex with choice: studying a women's sexual risk reduction hierarchy in an STD clinic. J Womens Health Gend Based Med, 10(8), 771-783.
12. Hart, G. J., Pool, R., Green, G., Harrison, S., Nyanzi, S., and Whitworth, J. A. (1999). Women's attitudes to condoms and female-controlled means of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. AIDS Care, 11(6), 687-698.
13. Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., and Branch, M. R. (2003a). A new look at an old method: the diaphragm. Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 35(6), 270-273.
14. Harvey, S. M., Bird, S. T., Maher, J. E., and Beckman, L. J. (2003b). Who continues using the diaphragm and who doesn't: implications for the acceptability of female-controlled HIV prevention methods. Womens Health Issues, 13(5), 185-193.
15. Heise, L. L. (1997). Beyond acceptability : reorienting research on contraceptive choice. In Beyond acceptability: users' perspectives on contraception, [compiled by] World Health Organization [WHO], Reproductive Health Matters (pp. 6-14): London, England, Reproductive Health Matters.
16. Hoffman, S., Exner, T. M., Leu, C. S., Ehrhardt, A. A., and Stein, Z. (2003). Female-condom use in a gender-specific family planning clinic trial. Am J Public Health, 93(11), 1897-1903.
17. Latka, M., Gollub, E., French, P., and Stein, Z. (2000). Male-condom and female-condom use among women after counseling in a risk-reduction hierarchy for STD prevention. Sex Transm Dis, 27(8), 431-437.
18. Macaluso, M., Demand, M., Artz, L., Fleenor, M., Robey, L., Kelaghan, J., et al. (2000). Female condom use among women at high risk of sexually transmitted disease. Fam Plann Perspect, 32(3), 138-144.
19. Malcolm, K., Lowry, D., and Woolfson, D. (2004, March 28-31). In vitro release of dextran sulfate from silicone intravaginal rings. Paper presented at the Microbicides 2004, London, UK.
20. Malcolm, K., Woolfson, D., Russell, J., and Andrews, C. (2003). In vitro release of nonoxynol-9 from silicone matrix intravaginal rings. J Control Release, 91(3), 355-364.
21. Moench, T., Chipato, T., and Padian, N. (2001). Preventing disease by protecting the cervix: the unexplored promise of internal vaginal barrier devices. AIDS, 15(13), 1595-1602.
22. Ortayli, N., Bulut, A., Nalbant, H., and Cottingham, J. (2000). Is the Diaphragm a Viable Option for Women in Turkey? International Family Planning Perspectives, 26(1), 36-42.
23. Pool, R., Hart, G., Green, G., Harrison, S., Nyanzi, S., and Whitworth, J. (2000a). Men's attitudes to condoms and female controlled means of protection against HIV and STDs in southwestern Uganda. Cult Health Sex, 2(2), 197-211.
24. Pool, R., Whitworth, J. A., Green, G., Mbonye, A. K., Harrison, S., Wilkinson, J., et al. (2000b). An acceptability study of female-controlled methods of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. Int J STD AIDS, 11(3), 162-167.
25. Posner, S., van der Straten, A., Kang, M., Chipato, T., and Padian, N. (2004, March 28-31). The effect of introducing the diaphragm on male condom use. Paper presented at the Microbicides 2004, London, UK.
26. Ravindran, T. S., and Sumathy, A. R. (1997). Is the diaphragm a suitable method of contraception for low-income women: A user-perspective study, Madras, India. Beyond Acceptability: User's perspectives on contraception - Out of print - A World Health Organization Monograph.
27. Ray, S., Bassett, M., Maposphere, C., Manangazira, P., Nicolette, J. D., Machekano, R., et al. (1995). Acceptability of the female condom in Zimbabwe: Positive but male-centered responses. Reprod Health Matters, 5, 68-78.
28. Ray, S., van De Wijgert, J., Mason, P., Ndowa, F., and Maposhere, C. (2001). Constraints faced by sex workers in use of female and male condoms for safer sex in urban zimbabwe. J Urban Health, 78(4), 581-592.
29. Severy, L. J., and Spieler, J. (2000). New methods of family planning: implications for intimate behaviour. Journal of Sex Research, 37(3), 258-265.
30. Snow, R., Garcia, S., Kureshy, N., Sadana, R., Singh, S., Becerra-Valdivia, M., et al. (1997). Attributes of contraceptive technology : women's preferences in seven countries. In Beyond acceptability: users' perspectives on contraception, [compiled by] World Health Organization [WHO], Reproductive Health Matters (pp. 36-48): London, England, Reproductive Health Matters.
31. Trussell, J., Sturgen, K., Strickler, J., and Dominik, R. (1994). Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods. Fam Plann Perspect, 26(2), 66-72.
32. van der Straten, A., Kang, M. S., Posner, S. F., Kamba, M., Chipato, T., and Padian, N. S. (2005). Predictors of diaphragm use as a potential sexually transmitted disease/HIV prevention method in Zimbabwe. Sex Transm Dis, 32(1), 64-71.
33. van der Straten, A., Montgomery, L., Kamba, M., Kang, M., Posner, S., Chipato, T., et al. (2004, March 28-31). Preference for gel use with diaphragms in Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the Microbicides 2004, London, UK.
34. Weller, S., and Davis, K. (2002). Condom effectiveness in reducing heterosexual HIV transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 3, CD003255.
35. Yimin, C., Zhaohui, L., Xianmi, W., Shiying, W., Lingzhi, H., Yueying, X., et al. (2002). Introductory study on female condom use among sex workers in China. Contraception, 66(3), 179-185.