Call and recall cervical screening programme: Screening interval and age limits

Current Diagnostic Pathology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 114-126

  Sasieni, P ^a   Castanon, A ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Age limit; Case control; Cervical cancer; Effectiveness; Pap smear; Screening interval; Side effects; Trends; Young women

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGE SPECIFIC CARE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; PREMATURE LABOR; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 32144434384     PISSN: 09686053     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cdip.2005.12.006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (66)

1. IARC Working Group Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies BMJ 293 1986 659 664
2. World Health Organization Cervix cancer screening. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention vol. 10 2005 IARC Press Lyon p. 302
3. Department of Health Cervical screening programme, England: 2002-03. Statistical bulletins 2003 Department of Health London
4. C.B. Woodman, S. Collins, and H. Winter Natural history of cervical human papillomavirus infection in young women: a longitudinal cohort study Lancet 357 2001 1831 1836
5. S. Collins, S. Mazloomzadeh, and H. Winter High incidence of cervical human papillomavirus infection in women during the first sexual relationship Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109 2002 96 98
6. J. Cuzick, A. Szarewski, and G. Terry Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening Lancet 345 1995 1533 1536
7. A.B. Moscicki, S. Shiboski, and N.K. Hills Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women Lancet 364 9446 2004 1642 1644
8. A.G. Östör Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review Int J Gynecol Pathol 12 1993 186 192
9. P. Sasieni, J. Adams, and J. Cuzick Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories Br J Cancer 89 2003 88 93
10. G. Sawaya, K.J. McConnell, and S.L. Kulasingam Risk of cervical cancer associated with extending the interval between cervical cancer screenings N Engl J Med 349 2003 1501 1509
11. R. Doll P. Payne J. Waterhouse Cancer incidence in five continents vol. I 1966 International Union Against Cancer Switzerland p. 241
12. R. Doll C. Muir J. Waterhouse Cancer incidence in five continents vol. II 1970 International Union Against Cancer Switzerland p. 388
13. Waterhouse J, Muir C, Powell J, Correa P, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. III. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1976. p. 584.
14. J. Waterhouse C. Muir J. Powell K. Shanmugaratnam Cancer incidence in five continents vol. IV 1982 IARC Scientific Publications Lyon 811
15. Wellings K, et al. Lust: changing sexual behaviour in the UK. In: Stewart I, Vaitilingam R, editors. Seven deadly sins: a new look at society through an old lens. Economic and Social Research Council; 2005.
16. D. Saslow, C.D. Runowicz, and D. Solomon American Cancer Society Guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer CA Cancer J Clin 52 2002 342 359
17. K. Nanda, D.C. McCrory, and E.R. Myers Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review Ann Intern Med 132 2000 810 819
18. McCrory DC, Matchar DB, Bastian L, et al. Evaluation of cervical cytology. In: Evidence report/technology assessment no. 5. Prepared by Duke University under contract no. 290-97-0014. AHCPR Publication No. 99-E010. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1999.
19. A.B. Miller The (in)efficiency of cervical screening in Europe Eur J Cancer 38 2002 321 326
20. M. Zappa, C.B. Visioli, and S. Ciatto Lower protection of cytological screening for adenocarcinomas and shorter protection for younger women: the result of a case-control study in Florence Br J Cancer 90 2004 1784 1786
21. K. Sigurdsson, and S. Adalsteinsson Risk variables affecting high-grade Pap smears at second visit: effects of screening interval, year, age and low-grade smears Int J Cancer 94 2001 884 888
22. J. Waterhouse C. Muir J. Powell T. Mack S. Whelan Cancer incidence in five continents vol. V 1987 IARC Scientific Publications Lyon 969
23. D.M. Parkin S.L. Whelan J. Ferlay L. Raymond J. Young Cancer incidence in five continents vol. VII 1997 IARC Scientific Publications Lyon 1240
24. D.M. Parkin S.L. Whelan J. Ferlay L. Teppo D.B. Thomas Cancer incidence in five continents vol. VIII 2002 IARC Scientific Publications Lyon 781
25. J. Mandelblatt, W.F. Lawrence, and L. Gaffikin Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries J Natl Cancer Inst 94 2002 1469 1483
26. S. Goldie, L. Kuhn, L. Denny, A. Pollack, and T.C. Wright Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings JAMA 285 2001 3107 3115
27. European Commission Proposal for a council recommendation in cancer screening 2003 European Commission Brussels
28. P. Sasieni, J. Cuzick, and E. Lynch-Farmery National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer Br J Cancer 73 1996 1001 1005
29. A. Herbert, K. Stein, T.N. Bryant, C. Breen, and P. Old Relation between the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and the screening interval: is a five year interval too long? J Med Screen 3 3 1996 140 145
30. B. Sirovich, and G. Welch The frequency of Pap smear screening in the United States J Gen Intern Med 19 2004 243 250
31. NHS Cervical Screening Programme Colposcopy and programme management D. Luesley S. Leeson Guidelines for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme 2004 Sheffield 3 5
32. M. van den Akker-van Marle, M. van Ballegooijen, and J.D. Habbema Low risk of cervical cancer during a long period after negative screening in the Netherlands Br J Cancer 88 2003 1054 1057
33. M.G. Miller, H.Y. Sung, and G.F. Sawaya Screening interval and risk of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer Obstet Gynecol 101 1 2003 29 37
34. W. Van Wijngaarden, and I.D. Duncan Rationale for stopping cervical screening in women over 50 BMJ 306 1993 967 971
35. M. Cruickshank, V. Angus, and K. Kelly The case for stopping cervical screening at age 50 Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104 1997 586 589
36. G. Flannelly, J. Monaghan, and M. Cruickshank Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study Br J Obstet Gynaecol 111 2004 362 369
37. M.E. Cruickshank, G. Chambers, and G. Murray Age-restricted cervical screening: HPV testing at age 50 identifies a high risk group for cervical disease Int J Gynecol Cancer 13 4 2002 564
38. M. Grainge, R. Seth, and C. Coupland Human papillomavirus infection in women who develop high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer: a case-control study in the UK Br J Cancer 92 2005 1794 1799
39. B. Sirovich, D.J. Gottlieb, and E.S. Fisher The burden of prevention: downstream consequences of Pap smear testing in the elderly J Med Screen 10 2003 189 195
40. Health Protection Agency Diagnoses of selected STIs by region, sex and age group. United Kingdom: 1995-2004 2004 Health Protection Agency London
41. A.R. Chang Carcinoma in situ of the cervix and its malignant potential. A lesson from New Zealand Cytopathology 1 1990 321 328
42. B.J. Morrison, A.J. Coldman, D.A. Boyes, and G.H. Anderson Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ Br J Cancer 74 5 1996 814 819
43. Office for National Statistics Cancer statistics registrations. Series MB1 no. 32 2002 Office for National Statistics London
44. A. Fletcher Screening for cancer of the cervix in elderly women Lancet 335 1990 97 99
45. Eluf-Neto J, Booth M. Cervical screening in the elderly. Lancet 1990;99.
46. M. Quinn, P. Babb, J. Jones, A. Baker, and C. Ault Cancer CD-ROM. Cancer statistics - registrations 1997 Office for National Statistics London
47. NSW Central Cancer Registry Reporting Module. Available at: http://www.statistics.cancerinstitute.org.au. Accessed 29 June 2005.
48. The Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research. Available at: http://www.kreftregisteret.no/frame.htm?english.htm. Accessed 28 June 2005.
49. Public Health Agency of Canada. Cancer Surveillance On-line. Cancer incidence by age group and province. Public Health Agency of Canada, 2004. Available at: http://www.dsol-smed.hc-sc.gc.ca/dsol-smed/cancer/c_age_e.html. Accessed 22 July 2005.
50. M.C. Fahs, J. Malndelblatt, C. Schechter, and C. Muller Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for the elderly Ann Intern Med 117 6 1992 520 527
51. W.A. Leyden, M.M. Manos, and A.M. Geiger Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process J Cancer Inst 97 9 2005 675 683
52. J.W. Sellors, and R. Sankaranarayanan Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. A beginner's manual 2004 IARC Lyon
53. 2 conization in postmenopausal age: risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up Gynecol Oncol 96 2004 771 775
54. S. Houlard, F. Perrotin, and F. Fourquet Risk factors for cervical stenosis after laser cone biopsy Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 104 2002 144 147
55. J.M. Crane Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review Obstet Gynecol 102 2003 1058 1062
56. G. Acharya, I. Kjeldberg, and S.M. Hansen Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Arch Gynecol Obstet 272 2 2005 109 112
57. A. El-Bastawissi, T.M. Becker, and J.R. Daling Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 93 1999 207 212
58. L. Sadler, A. Saftlas, and W. Wang Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery JAMA 291 2004 2100 2106
59. S. Samson, J.R. Bentley, T.J. Fahey, D.J. McKay, and G.H. Gill The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 105 2005 325 332
60. L. Tan, E. Pepera, and R.K. Haloob The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix J Obstet Gynaecol 24 2004 25 27
61. A. Ferenczy, D. Choukroun, T. Falcone, and E. Franco The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American experience Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 1995 1246 1250
62. P.I. Blomfield, J. Buxton, J. Dunn, and D.M. Luesley Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone Am J Obstet Gynecol 169 3 1993 620 625
63. D.K. Haffenden, A. Bigrigg, B.W. Codling, and M.D. Read Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100 1993 1059 1060
64. P.G. Braet, J.M. Peel, and D.W. Fenton A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone J Obstet Gynaecol 14 1994 79 82
65. M. Cruickshank, G. Flannelly, D.M. Campbell, and H.C. Kitchener Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102 6 1995 467 470
66. E. Paraskevaidis, G. Koliopoulos, and E. Lolis Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage 1A1) Cervical Cancer Gynecol Oncol 86 2002 10 13