Geometric analysis of the proximal femur in a diverse sample of dogs

Research in Veterinary Science

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 243-252

  Palierne, Sophie ^a   Asimus, Erik ^a   Mathon, Didier ^a   Meynaud Collard, Patricia ^a   Autefage, Andre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Dog; Femoral morphology; Model; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BODY SIZE; BONE MARROW; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE STRUCTURE; BREED DIFFERENCE; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; DOG; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOMETRY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOGS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 32044460656     PISSN: 00345288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. W. Al Hertani J.P. Waddell et al. The effect of partial vs. full hydroxyapatite coating on periprosthetic bone quality around the canine madreporic femoral stem J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 53 5 2000 518-524
2. S.P. Arnoczky P.A. Torzilli Biomechanical analysis of forces acting about the canine hip Am. J. Vet. Res. 42 1981 1581-1585
3. F. Bergmann F. Graichen et al. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients J. Biomech. 26 8 1993 969-990
4. Betti, E., 1997 Etude morphométrique du fémur de chien. Variation en fonction des paramètres signalétiques de l'animal. Thesis for the Doctorat du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Compared Anatomy (Paris).
5. R.D. Bloebaum D.T. Ota et al. Comparison of human and canine external femoral morphologies in the cortex of total hip replacement J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 27 1993 1149-1159
6. J. Bobyn H. Glassman et al. The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous coated hip replacement Clin. Orthop. 261 1990 196-213
7. A. Casinos J. Bou et al. On the allometry of long bones in dogs (Canis familiaris) J. Morphol. 190 1 1986 73-79
8. J. Cordey Introduction: Basic concept and definitions in mechanics Injury 31 Suppl. 2 2000 1-13
9. P.E. Greis J.D. Kang et al. A long-term study on defect filling and bone ingrowth using a canine fiber metal total hip model Clin. Orthop. 274 1992 47-59
10. S.A. Hacking J.D. Bobyn et al. The osseous response to corundum blasted implant surfaces in a canine hip model Clin. Orthop. 364 1999 240-253
11. E.J. Harvey J.D. Bobyn et al. Effect of flexibility of the femoral stem on bone-remodeling and fixation of the stem in a canine total hip arthroplasty model without cement J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am) A 81 1 1999 93-107
12. F.T. Hoaglund W.D. Low Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese Clin. Orthop. 152 1980 10-16
13. J.P. Hua P.S. Walker Relative motion of hip stems under load: An in vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical and custom asymmetrical designs J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am) 76 1994 95-103
14. S.V.N. Jaecques J.A. Helsen et aL. Geometric analysis of the proximal medullary cavity of the femur in the german shepherd dog Vet. Comp. Orthop. Traumatol. 11 1998 29-36
15. G.M. Kotzar D.T. Davy et al. Telemetrized in vivo hip joint force data: a report on two patients after total hip surgery J. Orthop. Res. 9 5 1991 621-633
16. H.J. Laine M.U. Letho et al. Diversity of proximal medullary canal J. Arthoplasty 15 1 2000 86-92
17. M. Maruyama J.R. Feinberg et al. Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur anteversion angle and implant positioning Clin. Orthop. 393 2001 52-65
18. P. Massin L. Geais et al. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems J. Arthroplasty. 15 1 2000 93-101
19. P.M. Montavon R.B. Hohn et al. Inclination and anteversion angles of the femoral head and neck in the dog. Evaluation of a standard method of measurement Vet. Surg. 14 4 1985 277-282
20. P.C. Noble J.W. Alexander et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design Clin. Orthop. 235 1988 148-165
21. D. Nunn M.A. Freeman et al. Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty: Response to an anteriorly applied load J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br) 71 1989 452-455
22. M.D. Ohl L.A. Whiteside et al. Torsional fixation of a modular femoral hip component Clin. Orthop. 287 1993 135-141
23. A.E. Page C. Allan et al. Determination of loading parameters in the canine hip in vivo J. Biomech. 26 4/5 1993 571-579
24. P.V. Schawalder H.P. Sterchi Der Centrum-Collum-Diaphysenwinkel und der Antetorsionswinkel beim Hund K. Praxis 26 1981 151-162
25. C. Schidlo C. Becker et al. Change in the CCD angle and the femoral anteversion angle by hip prosthesis implantation Z. Orthop. Ihre Grenzgeb. 137 3 1999 259-264
26. D.R. Sumner T.M. Turner et al. Symmetry of the canine femur: implications for experimental samples size requirements J. Orthop. Res. 6 5 1988 758-765
27. D.R. Sumner T.C. Devlin et al. The geometry of the adult canine proximal femur J. Orthop. Res. 8 5 1990 671-677
28. T.M. Turner D.R. Sumner et al. A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model J. Bone Joint Surg.(Am) 68 9 1986 1396-1409
29. P. Walker D. Schneeweis et al. Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses J. Biomech. 20 7 1987 693-702