Reading experience and changes in the processing of letters, written words, and pseudohomophones: Comparing fifth-grade students and university students

Journal of Genetic Psychology

Volumn 166, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 407-434

  Miller, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Letters; Level of processing; Pseudohomophones; Reading development; Real words

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; WRITING;

CHILD; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; READING; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY; WRITING;

EID: 32044447713     PISSN: 00221325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/GNTP.166.4.407-434     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Breznitz, Z. (1997). Reading rate acceleration: Developmental aspects. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 427-441.
3. Breznitz, Z., & Leikin, M. (2001). Effects of accelerated reading rate on processing words' syntactic functions by normal and dyslexic readers: Event related potentials evidence. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 276-296.
4. Breznitz, Z., & Share, D. L. (1992). Effects of accelerated reading rate on memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 193-199.
5. Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313-321.
6. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 5-24.
7. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
8. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). New York: Academic Press.
9. de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51-77.
10. Ehri, L. C. (1999). Phases of development in learning to read words. In I. Pakhiil & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
11. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
12. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301-370). London: Erlbaum.
13. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trials. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
14. Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001). Routes to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading. New York: Psychological Press.
15. Kjeldsen, A. C., Niemi, P., & Olofsson, A. (2003). Training phonological awareness in kindergarten level children: Consistency is more important than quality. Learning & Instruction, 13, 349-365.
16. Koriat, A. (1985). Lexical access for low- and high-frequency words in Hebrew. Memory & Cognition, 13, 37-44.
17. Miller, P. (1997). The effect of communication mode on the development of phonemic awareness in prelingually deaf students. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 40, 1151-1163.
18. Miller, P. (2004). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: What can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 593-615.
19. Moor, W., Ghyselinck, M., & Brybaert, M. (2001). The effects of frequency of occurrence and age of acquisition in word processing. In C. Frank (Ed.), Advances in psychology-research (Vol. 5, pp. 71-84). Huntington, NY: Nova Science.
20. Report of the National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington. DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267-298.
22. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151-218.
23. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95-129.
24. Share, D. L., & Levin. I. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write (pp. 89-111). Cambridge. England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Siegel, L. S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304-319.
26. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
27. Taouk, M., & Coltheart, M. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 27-57.
28. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanion, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disabilities (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2-40.