22 Years on: The impact and relevance of the UK No Smoking Day

Tobacco Control

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 19-25

  Owen, L ^b   Youdan, Ben ^a,c  

^a No Smoking Day   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^c No Smoking Day   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONSUMER; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEPHONE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PROMOTION; HOTLINES; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 31944442421     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.011254     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Office of National Statistics. General Household Survey 2003; mid-2003 population estimates: Great Britain, ONS, 2004.
2. Grey A, Owen L, Bolling K. A breath of fresh air: tackling smoking through the media. London: HAD, 2000.
3. Naidoo B, Warm D, Quigley R, et al. Smoking and public health; a review of reviews of interventions to increase smoking cessation, reduce smoking initiation and prevent further uptake of smoking. HAD, 2004.
4. Levy DT, Friend K. A computer simulation model of mass media interventions directed at tobacco use. Prev Med 2001;32:284-94.
5. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluation of anti-smoking advertising campaigns. JAMA 1998;279:772-7.
6. Pierce JP, Macaskill P, Hill D. Long-term effectiveness of mass media led antismoking campaigns in Australia. Am J Public Health 1990;80:565-9.
7. McVey D, Stapleton J. Can anti-smoking television advertising and local tobacco control activity affect smoking behaviour? A controlled trial of the Health Education Authority's anti-smoking campaign. Tob Control 2000;9:273-82.
8. Anon. Smoking kills; a white paper on tobacco. London: HMSO, 1998.
9. Office of National Statistics. Department of Health Statistical Bulletin: Statistics on smoking cessation services in England, April 2003 to March 2004, ONS, 2004.
10. Department of Health. Coronary heart disease: national service framework for coronary heart disease. London: DoH, 2000.
11. Department of Health. The NHS cancer plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: DoH, 2000.
12. Acheson D. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London: HMSO, 1998.
13. Wanless D. Securing good health for the whole population. London: HM Treasury, 2004.
14. Anon. Choosing health: making healthier choices easier, Public Health White Paper. London: HMSO, 2004.
15. Parrott S, Godfrey C. Economics of smoking cessation. BMJ 2004;328:947-9.
16. Przewoźniak K. Participation action for a great European Smoke Out. ENSP, 2004.
17. Tones K. Beyond the randomized controlled trial: a case for 'judicial review'. Health Educ Res 1997;12:I-IV, (2).
18. Owen L, Lafferty G. Quitline, An audit of the national helpline for smokers 1995-1998. HEA, 2000.
19. UK Awareness Campaign Register. The Profile Group 2005.
20. Jarvis M. Monitoring cigarette smoking prevalence in Britain in a timely fashion. Addiction 2003;98:1569-74.
21. Lader D, Meltzer H. Smoking behavior and attitudes 2002, ONS, 2003.
22. Ossip-Klein DJ, Giovino GA, Megahed N, et al. Effects of a smokers hotline: results from a 10-county self-help trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:325-32.
23. Boyd NR, Windsor RA, Perkins LL, et al. Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women. Maternal and Child Health 1998;2:77-83.
24. Murray RP, Connett JE, Istvan JA, et al. Relations of cotinine and carbon monoxide to self-reported smoking in a cohort of smokers and ex-smokers followed over 5 years. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4:287-94.