A new CMOS-based digital imaging detector for applications in mammography

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 5923, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-11

  Baysal, Mehmet A ^a   Toker, Emre ^a  

^a Bioptics Incorporation   (United States)

Author keywords

DET; DX; METR; MG

Indexed keywords

CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; CMOS INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; MAMMOGRAPHY; SENSORS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS; X RAY ANALYSIS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; QUANTUM EFFICIENCY;

DET; DX; METR; 2-D NOISE POWER SPECTRUM (2-D NFS); CMOS DETECTORS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES; RADIATION DETECTORS;

EID: 31844442646     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.624946     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. ACS, American Cancer Society website, Breast Cancer Facts and Figures http://www.cancer.org. 2005, American Cancer Society.
2. Thurfijell E.L., L.J.A., Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years. Radiology, 1996. 201: p. 421-426.
3. NCI, National Cancer Institute website, Cancer Resources http://cis.nci.nih.gov/resources.2005, National Cancer Institute.
4. Karellas, A., S. Vedantham, and S. Suryanarayanan. Digital mammography image acquisition technology, in Proc. RSNA. 2004. Chicago.
5. Nishikawa R.M., Y.M.J., Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen sytems. Med. Phys., 1985.12(1): p. 32-39.
6. Lewin J.M., H.R.E., D'Orsi C.J., Clinical evaluation of a full-field digital mammography prototype for cancer detection in a screening setting: work in progress. Radiology, 1998. 209: p. 238.
7. Lazzari B., B.G., Gori C., Nyakanen K. Physical characteristics of a clinical prototype for ful-field digital mammography with an a-Se flat panel detector, in Preprint from Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2003. 2003.
8. Berns E.A., H.R.E., Cutter G.R., Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen film mammography in clinical practice. Med. Phys., 2002. 29: p. 830-834.
9. Lewin J.M., H.R.E., D'Orsi C.J., Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology, 2001. 218: p. 873-880.
10. Skaane P., Y.K., Skejennald A., Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo study. Radiology, 2003. 229: p. 877-884.
11. Byng, J.W., J.P. Critten, and M.J. Yaffe, Thickness equalization processing for mammographic images. Radiology, 1997(203): p. 564-568.
12. Seibert, J.A., J.M. Boone, and V.N. Cooper, Evaluation of a computed radiography detector for digital mammography. Med. Phys., 2001. 28: p. 1246.
13. Roehrig, H., E. Krupinski, and T. Yu. Physical and psycho-physical evaluation of dgital systems for mammography. in Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging. 1995.
14. Roehrig, H., et al. DQE evaluation of a full-field digital mammography system, in Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging. 2004. San Diego.
15. Roehrig, H., et al. Signal, noise and detective quantum efficiency in CCD based x-ray imaging systems for use in mammography. in Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging. 1994.
16. Boone, J.M., T.R. Fewell, and R.J. Jennings, Molybdenum, rhodium and tungsten anode spectral moels using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. Med. Phys., 1997. 24: p. 1863-1874.
17. Fujita, H., et al., A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiology. IEEE Transactions in Medical Imaging, 1992. 11: p. 34-39.