A comparison of punishment exchange rates between offenders under supervision and their supervising officers

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 39-50

  Flory, Christopher M ^a   May, David C ^a   Minor, Kevin I ^a   Wood, Peter B ^b  

^a EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31644432774     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. E. Apospori & G. Alpert Research note: The role of differential experience with the criminal justice system in changes in perception of severity of legal sanctions over time Crime and Delinquency 39 1993 184-194
2. B.K. Applegate F.T. Cullen & B.S. Fisher Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap? Journal of Criminal Justice 30 2002 89-100
3. Bae, I. (1991). A survey on public acceptance of restitution as an alternative to incarceration for property offenders in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
4. M.P. Brown & P. Elrod Electronic house arrest: An examination of citizen attitudes Crime and Delinquency 41 1995 332-346
5. V.S. Burton X. Ju R.G. Dunaway & N.T. Wolfe The correctional orientation of Bermuda prison guards: An assessment of attitudes towards punishment and rehabilitation International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 15 1991 71-80
6. J.M. Byrne The future of intensive probation supervision and the new intermediate sanctions Crime and Delinquency 36 1990 6-41
7. T. Clear & E. Latessa Probation officers roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance vs. treatment Justice Quarterly 10 3 1993 441-459
8. T.R. Clear & V.O. O'Leary Controlling the offender in the community 1983 Lexington Books Lexington, MA
9. B.M. Crouch Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation Justice Quarterly 10 1993 67-88
10. F.T. Cullen S.E. Skovron J.E. Scott & V.S. Burton Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology Criminal Justice and Behavior 17 1990 6-18
11. S. Diamond & L.J. Stalans The myth in judicial leniency in sentencing Behavioral Sciences and the Law 7 1989 73-89
12. K. English J. Crouch & P. Pullen Attitudes towards crime: A survey of Colorado citizens and criminal justice officials 1989 Colorado Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice Denver
13. M. Fichter & C. Veneziano Criminal justice attitudes-Missouri 1988 Missouri Department of Corrections Jefferson City
14. B. Fulton A. Stichman L. Travis & E. Latessa Moderating probation and parole officer attitudes to achieve desired outcomes Prison Journal 77 3 1997 295-312
15. J.A. Gordon L.J. Moriarty & P.H. Grant Juvenile correctional officers' perceived fear and risk of victimization Criminal Justice and Behavior 30 1 2003 62-84
16. B. Haghighi & A. Lopez Gender and perceptions of prisons and prisoners Journal of Criminal Justice 26 6 1998 453-464
17. Hardyman, P. (1988). No frills: A study of probation resources, activities and outcome. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
18. P.M. Harris R.D. Petersen & S. Rapoza Between probation and revocation: A study of intermediate sanctions decision-making Journal of Criminal Justice 29 2001 307-318
19. R. Hawkins & G.P. Alpert American prison systems: Punishment and justice 1989 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
20. John Doble Research Associates, Inc. (1995). Crime and corrections: The views of the people of North Carolina. Retrieved December 1, 2004, from http://www.doc.state.nc.us/NEWS/1996/96news/doblerep.htm
21. M. Kifer C. Hemmens & M.K. Stohr The goals of corrections: Perspectives from the lines Criminal Justice Review 28 1 2003 47-69
22. D.C. May & P.B. Wood What influences offenders' willingness to serve alternative sanctions Prison Journal 85 2005 145-167
23. D.C. May P.B. Wood J.L. Mooney & K.I. Minor What influences offenders' willingness to serve alternative sanctions? Crime and Delinquency 51 2005 373-399
24. B.R. McCarthy Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement and electronic monitoring 1987 Criminal Justice Press Monsey, NY
25. K.A. McClelland & G. Alpert Factor analysis applied to magnitude estimates of punishment seriousness: Patterns of individual differences Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1 1985 307-318
26. R.C. McCorkle Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes towards six common crimes Crime and Delinquency 39 1993 240-252
27. N. Morris & M. Tonry Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system 1990 Oxford University Press New York
28. J. Petersilia When probation becomes more dreaded than prison Federal Probation 54 1990 23-27
29. J. Petersilia & E.P. Deschenes What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. intermediate sanctions Federal Probation 58 1 1994 3-8
30. J. Petersilia & E.P. Deschenes Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions Prison Journal 74 1994 306-328
31. J.V. Roberts & A.N. Doob Sentencing and public opinion: Taking false shadows for true substances Osgoode Hall Law Journal 27 1989 491-515
32. J.V. Roberts & L.J. Stalans Public opinion, crime and criminal justice 1997 Westview Press, Harper Collins Publishers Boulder, CO
33. J.O. Smykla & W.L. Selke Intermediate sanctions: Sentencing in the 1990s 1995 Anderson Cincinnati, OH
34. W. Spelman The severity of intermediate sanctions Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 32 1995 107-135
35. E. Studt Surveillance and service to parole 1978 U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections Washington, DC
36. S. Stylianou Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: What have we learned and what else do we want to know? Journal of Criminal Justice 14 1 2003 57-67
37. P. Van Voorhis S.L. Browning M. Simon & J. Gordon The meaning of punishment: Inmates' orientation to the prison experience Prison Journal 77 2 1997 135-166
38. M.S. Vaughn Listening to the experts: A national study of correctional administrators' responses to prison overcrowding Criminal Justice Review 18 1993 12-25
39. P.B. Wood & H.G. Grasmick Toward the development of punishment equivalencies: Male and female inmates rate the severity of alternative sanctions compared to prison Justice Quarterly 16 1999 19-50
40. P.B. Wood D.C. & May Race differences in perceptions of sanction severity: A comparison of prison with alternatives Justice Quarterly 20 2003 605-631
41. P.B. Wood D.C. May & H.G. Grasmick Gender differences in the perceived severity of boot camp Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 40 3-4 2005 145-167