Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 40-63

  Haywood, H Carl ^a   Tzuriel, David ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31544471108     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_5     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Benjamin, L., & Lomofsky, L. (2002). Effects of the observation of dynamic and static assessment on teachers’ perceptions of the learning potential of less academic learners. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2(2), 102–123 (online: Http://www.iace.coged.org/journal)
2. Binet, A. (1911). Les idées modernes sur les enfants [Contemporary ideas on children]. Paris: Flammarion. (Reedited and republished in 1973, with a preface by Jean Piaget.)
3. Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 272–305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 173–195). New York: Guilford.
5. Burns, S. (1991). Comparison of two types of dynamic assessment with young children. The International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 2, 29–42.
6. Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992). The dynamic assessment of intelligence. In H.C. Haywood, & D. Tzuriel, (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 167–186). New York: Springer.
7. Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row.
8. Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1992). Improving the quality of instruction: Roles for dynamic assessment. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 317–331). New York: Springer.
9. Elliott, J. (1993). Assisted Assessment: If it is dynamic why is it so rarely employed? Educational and Child Psychology, 10, 48–58.
10. Feuerstein, R., Haywood, H. C., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Jensen, M. (1986). Examiner manual for the Learning Potential Assessment Device. Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute.
11. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
12. Freeman, F. S. (1950). Theory and practice of psychological testing. New York: Holt.
13. Gordon, J. B., & Haywood, H. C. (1969). Input deficit in cultural-familial retardates: Effect of stimulus enrichment. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 73, 604–610.
14. Guthke, J. (1992). Learning tests: The concept, main research findings, problems, and trends. In J. S. Carlson (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, 1A (pp. 213–233). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
15. Guthke, J., & Al-Zoubi, A. (1987). Kulturspezifische differenzen in den Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) und in einer Lenrtestvariante der CPM [Specific cultural differences in the Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) and in a CPM Lerntest variation]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 34, 306–311.
16. Guthke, J., & Wingenfeld, S. (1992). The learning test concept: Origins, state of the art, and trends. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 64–93). New York: Springer.
17. Gutkin, T. B., & Reynolds, C. R. (1980). Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services. Journal of School Psychology, 18, 34–39.
18. Hamers, J. H. M., Hessels, M. G. P., & van Luit, J. E. H. (1991). Leertest voor etnische minderheden: Test en handleiding [Learning potential test for ethnic minorities: Test and manual]. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
19. Haywood, H. C. (1977a). Alternatives to normative assessment. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Research to practice in mental retardation: Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency, Vol. 2, Education and training (pp. 11–18). Baltimore: University Park Press.
20. Haywood, H. C. (1977b). A cognitive approach to the education of retarded children. Peabody Journal of Education, 54, 110–116.
21. Haywood, H. C. (1986). The Test of Verbal Abstracting (TVA). In R. Feuerstein, H. C. Haywood, Y. Rand, M. B. Hoffman, & M. Jensen, Examiner manual for the Learning Potential Assessment Device. Jerusalem: Hadassah-WIZO-Canada Research Institute.
22. Haywood, H. C. (1992). Interactive assessment: A special issue. Journal of Special Education, 26, 233–234.
23. Haywood, H. C. (1995, November). Cognitive early education: Confluence of psychology and education. Paper presented at the Second International Congress on Psychology and Education, Madrid.
24. Haywood, H. C. (1997). Interactive assessment. In R. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment of individuals with mental retardation (pp. 103–129). San Diego, CA: Singular.
25. Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. & Burns, S. (1986). Stimulating cognitive development at developmental level: A tested non-remedial preschool curriculum for preschoolers and older retarded children. In M. Schwebel & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Facilitating cognitive development: Principles, practices, and programs (pp. 127–147). New York: Haworth Press.
26. Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H., & Burns, S. (1992). Bright Start: Cognitive Curriculum for Young Children. Watertown, MA: Charles Bridge.
27. Haywood, H. C., Filler, J. W., Shifman, M. A., & Chatelanat, G. (1975). Behavioral assessment in mental retardation. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 3, pp. 96–136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Haywood, H. C., & Miller, M. B. (2002, May). Dynamic assessment of persons with traumatic brain injuries: A pilot study. Paper given at the European Regional conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Rimini, Italy.
29. Haywood, H. C., & Paour, J.-L. (1992). Alfred Binet (1857–1911): Multifaceted pioneer. Psychology in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 18, 1–4.
30. Haywood, H. C., & Switzky, H. N. (1992). Ability and modifiability: What, how, and how much? In J. S. Carlson (Ed.), Cognition and educational practice: An international perspective (pp. 25–85). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
31. Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (Eds.). (1992). Interactive assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. Haywood, H. C., Tzuriel, D., & Vaught, S. (1992). Psycheducational assessment from a transactional perspective. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 38–63). New York: Springer.
33. Haywood, H. C., & Wingenfeld, S. (1992). Interactive assessment as a research tool. Journal of Special Education, 26, 253–268.
34. Heinrich, J. J. (1991). Responsiveness of adults with severe head injury to mediated learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University.
35. Hessels, M. G. P. (1997). Low IQ but high learning potential: Why Zeyneb and Moussa do not belong in special education. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 121–136.
36. Hessels, M. G. P., & Hamers, J. H. M. (1993). A learning potential test for ethnic minorities. In J. H. M. Hamers & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment (pp. 285–312). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
37. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
38. Jensen, A. R. (1985). The nature of Black–White differences on various psychometric tests. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 359–368.
39. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
40. Kaniel, S., Tzuriel, D., Feuerstein, R., Ben-Shachar, N., & Eitan, T. (1991). Dynamic assessment, learning, and transfer abilities of Jewish Ethiopian immigrants to Israel. In R. Feuerstein, P. S. Klein, & A. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Mediated learning experience (pp. 179–209). London: Freund.
41. Kester, E. S., & Peña, E. D. (2001). Outcomes of dynamic assessment with culturally and linguistically diverse students: A comparison of three teaching methods within a test–teach–test framework. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2, 42–49. (online: Http://www.iacep.coged.org/journal)
42. Köhler, W. (1917). Intelligenzprüfungen an Anthropoiden [Intelligence testing of anthropoids]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
43. Lidz, C. S. (1992). Extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment in cognitive assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. Journal of Special Education, 26, 325–331.
44. Luria, A. R. (1976). The working brain (B. Haigh, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
45. Miller, M. B. (2002). Verbal Memory Test to accompany the TVA. Unpublished report. Patterson, NY: United Cerebral Palsy of Putnam and Southern Duchess Counties.
46. Missiuna, C., & Samuels, M. (1989). Dynamic assessment of preschool children with special needs: Comparison of mediation and instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 53–62.
47. Osterrieth, P.-A. (1944). Le Test de Copie d’Une Figure Complex: Contribution à l’étude de la perception et de la mémoire [The Complex Figure Test: Contribution to the study of perception and memory]. Éditions des Archives de Psychologie. Neuchâtel, France: Delachaux & Niestlé.
48. Paour, J.-L. (1992). Induction of logic structures in the mentally retarded: An assessment and intervention instrument. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 119–166). New York: Springer.
49. Paour, J.-L., & Soavi, G. (1992). A case study in the induction of logic structures. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 419–442). New York: Springer.
50. Raven, J. C. (1956). Guide to using the Colored Progressive Matrices, Sets A, Ab, and B. London: H.K. Lewis.
51. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
52. Resing, W. C. M. (1997). Learning potential assessment: The alternative for measuring intelligence? Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 68–82.
53. Rey, A. (1934). D’un procédé pour évaluer l’éducabilité (quelques applications en psychopathologie) [A procedure for assessing educability (applications to psychopathology).] Archives de Psychologie, 24, 297–337.
54. Rey, A. (1941). L’Examen psychologique dans les cas d’encéphalopathie traumatique [Psychological assessment in cases of traumatic brain injury]. Archives de Psychologie, 28(112).
55. Rey, A. (1959). Test de copie et de réproduction de mémoire de figures géométriques complexes [Test of copying and memory reproduction of geometric figures]. Paris: Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
56. Sclan, S. G. (1986). Dynamic assessment and thought disorder in paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenic patients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University.
57. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Sharpe, D., Cole, M., & Lave, J. (1979). Education and cognitive development: The evidence from experimental research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 44(1–2, Serial No. 178).
59. Skuy, M., & Shmukler, D. (1987). Effectiveness of the Learning Potential Assessment Device for Indian and “colored” South Africans. International Journal of Special Education, 2, 131–149.
60. Tzuriel, D. (1989). Inferential cognitive modifiability in young socially disadvantaged and advantaged children. International Journal of Dynamic Assessment and Instruction, 1, 65–80.
61. Tzuriel, D. (1992a). The dynamic assessment approach: A reply to Frisbee and Braden. Journal of Special Education, 26, 302–324.
62. Tzuriel, D. (1992b). The Children’s Inferential Thinking Modifiability (CITM) test—instruction manual. Ramat-Gan, Israel: School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
63. Tzuriel, D. (1995). The Children’s Seriational Thinking Modifiability (CSTM) Test—instruction manual. School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
64. Tzuriel, D. (1997). A novel dynamic assessment approach for young children: Major dimensions and current research. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 83–108.
65. Tzuriel, D. (1999). Parent-child mediated learning transactions as determinants of cognitive modifiability: Recent research and future directions. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 125, 109–156.
66. Tzuriel, D. (2000a). The Cognitive Modifiability Battery (CMB)—Assessment and intervention: Development of a dynamic assessment instrument. In C. S. Lidz and J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 375–406). New York: JAI.
67. Tzuriel, D. (2000b). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 385–435.
68. Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
69. Tzuriel, D. (2002). Cognitive education: The menace and hope. In W. Resing, W. Ruijssenaars, & D. Aalsvoort (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research perspectives in theory building and methodology (pp. 355–363). New York: JAI/Elsevier.
70. Tzuriel, D., & Eiboshitz, Y. (1992). A structured program for visual motor integration (SP–VMI) for preschool children. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 104–123.
71. Tzuriel, D., & Eran, Z. (1990). Inferential cognitive modifiability as a function of mother–child mediated learning experience (MLE) interactions among Kibbutz young children. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 103–117.
72. Tzuriel, D., & Ernst, H. (1990). Mediated learning experience and structural cognitive modifiability: Testing of distal and proximal factors by structural equation model. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 1, 119–135.
73. Tzuriel, D., & Hatzir, A. (1999, June). The effects of mediational strategies of fathers and mothers and amount of time they spent with their young children on children’s cognitive modifiability. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the International Association for Cognitive Education (IACE), Calgary, Canada.
74. Tzuriel, D., & Haywood, H. C. (1992). The development of interactive-dynamic approaches for assessment of learning potential. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive assessment (pp. 3–37). New York: Springer-Verlag.
75. Tzuriel, D., Kaniel, S., Kanner, A., & Haywood, H. C. (1999). The effectiveness of Bright Start program in kindergarten on transfer abilities and academic achievements. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 114, 111–141.
76. Tzuriel, D., & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 539–552.
77. Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1985). Analogical thinking modifiability in disadvantaged, regular, special education, and mentally retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 539–552.
78. Tzuriel, D., & Samuels, M. T. (2000). Dynamic assessment of learning potential: Inter-rater reliability of deficient cognitive functions, type of mediation, and non-intellective factors. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 1, 41–64. (online: Http://www.iacep.coged.org/journal)
79. Tzuriel, D., & Weiss, S. (1998). Cognitive modifiability as a function of mother–child mediated learning interactions, mother’s acceptance-rejection, and child’s personality. Early Childhood and Parenting, 7, 79–99.
80. Tzuriel, D., & Weitz, A. (1998). Mother–child mediated learning experience (MLE) strategies and children’s cognitive modifiability among very low birth weight (VLBW) and normally born weight (NBW) children. Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
81. Utley, C. A., Haywood, H. C., & Masters, J. C. (1992). Policy implications of psychological assessment of minority children. In H. C. Haywood & D. Tzuriel (Eds.). Interactive assessment (pp. 445–469). New York: Springer.
82. Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., Delclos, V. R., & Bransford, J. D. (1987). Dynamic assessment of intellectually handicapped children. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 327–359). New York: Guilford.
83. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Original work published 1934).
85. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock–Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Allen, TX: DLM.