Collaboration in the semantic grid: A basis for e-learning

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 19, Issue 9-10, 2005, Pages 881-904

  Page, Kevin R ^a   Michaelides, Danius T ^a   De Roure, David C ^a   Shadbolt, Nigel R ^a   Chen Burger, Yun Heh ^b   Dalton, Jeff ^b   Potter, Stephen ^b   Tate, Austin ^b   Shum, Simon J Buckingham ^c   Eisenstadt, Marc ^c   Bachler, Michelle ^c   Komzak, Jiri ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; VIRTUAL REALITY;

E-LEARNING; SEMANTIC GRID;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 31444445860     PISSN: 08839514     EISSN: 10876545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08839510500234750     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allison, C., S. Cerri, M. Gaeta, P. Ritrovato, and S. Salerno. 2003. Human learning as a global challenge: European learning grid infrastructure. In Global Peace Through the Global University System, eds. T. Varis, T. Utsumi, and W. Klemm, Hämeenlinn: University of Tampere, pages 465-488.
2. Andriesssen, J., M. Baker, and D. Suthers. 2003. Arguing to learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative learning Environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Britain, S. and O. Liber. 2000. A framework for the pedagogical evaluation of virtual learning environments (JTAP Report 041). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/jtap/htm/jtap-041.html.
4. Buckingham-Shum, S. 2000. Workshop report: Computer-supported collaborative argumentation for learning communities. ACM SIGWER Newsletter 9(1):27-30.
5. Carr, C. 2003. Using computer supported argument visualization to teach legal argumentation. In: Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, eds. P. A. Kirschner, S. J. Buckingham Shum, and C. S. Carr. London: Springer-Verlag.
6. Chalmers, M., I. MacColl, and M. Bell. 2003. Seamful design: Showing the seams in wearable computing. In: Proceedings of IEE Eurowearable 2003, pages 11-172, Birmingham, UK.
7. Clancey, W., M. Sierhuis, R. Alena, D. Berrios, J. Dowding, J. Graham, K. Tyree, R. Hirsh, W. Carry, A. Semple, S. Buckingham Shum, N. Shadbolt, and S. Rupert. 2005. Automating CapCom using mobile agents and robotic assistants. In Proceedings of 1st AIAA Space Exploration Conference, Orlando, FL. Available on CD "AIAA Meeting Papers on Disc," Reston, VA.
8. Conklin, J. 2003. Dialog mapping: Reflections on an industrial strength case study. In: Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, eds. P. A. Kirschner, S. J. Buckingham Shum, and C. S. Carr. London: Springer-Verlag.
9. Conklin, J., A. Selvin, S. Buckingham Shum, and M. Sierhuis. 2001. Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. In Proceedings The Twelfth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Hypertext '01), Århu, Denmark (aarhus), pages 123-124.
10. Eisenstadt, M., J. Komzak, and M. Dzbor. 2003. Instant messaging + maps = powerful tools for distance learning. In: Processings of TelEduc03.
11. Foster, I., C. Kcsselman, and S. Tuecke. 2001. The anatomy of the grid: Enabling scalable virtual organizations. International Journal of Supercomputer Applications 15(3).
12. Goble, C., D. De Roure, N. Shadbolt, and A. Fernandes. 2004. Enhancing services and applications with knowledge and semantics. In The Grid 2: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure (2nd edition), eds. C. Kesselman and I. Foster, San Francisco, CA: Morgan-Kaufmann, pages 431-458.
13. Hiltz, S. 1994. The Virtual Classroom: Learning without Limits Via Computer Networks, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Hooper, S. 1992. Cooperative learning and computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, Research 24(3):307-333.
15. Kanselaar, G., G. Erkens, J. Andriessen, M. Prangsma, A. Veerman, and J. Jaspers. 2003. Designing argumentation tools for collaborative learning. In Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Maliing, Springer-Verlag.
16. Kirschner, P., S. Buckingham Shum, and C. Carr. 2003. Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. London: Springer-Verlag.
17. Kreijns, C., P. Kirschner, and W. Jochems. 2002. The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology and Society 5(1).
18. Laurillard, D. 1993. Rethinking University Teaching. London: Routledge Falmer.
19. Laurillard, D., M. Stratfold, R. Luckin, L. Plowman, and J. Taylor. 2000. Affordances for learning in a non-linear narrative medium. Interactive Media in Education 2000(2).
20. Nardi, B. A., S. Whittaker, E. Isaacs, M. Creech, J. Johnson, and J. Hainsworth. 2002. Integrating communication and information through contactmap. Communications of the ACM 45(4):89-95.
21. Papadopoulos, N. 2004. Conflict Cartography: A Methodology Designed to Support the Efficient and Effective Resolution of Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Conflicts (white paper), http://www.compendiuminstitute.org/compendium/papers/ conflictcartography42.03.pdf.
22. Reffell, J. and S. Eklund. 2002. Instant messaging in Project-Based Learning. Berkeley: University of California.
23. Rheingold, H. 2002. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
24. Rittel, H. and M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155-159.
25. Selvin, A. 1999. Supporting collaborative analysis and design with hypertext functionality. Journal of Digital Information 1(4).
26. Selvin, A. and S. Buckingham Shum. 2002. Rapid knowledge construction: A case study in corporatecontingency planning using collaborative hypermedia. Knowledge and Process Management 9(2):119-128.
27. Selvin, A. M. and S. J. Buckingham Shum. 2005. Hypermedia as a productivity tool For doctoral research. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia (Special Issue on Scholarly Hypermedia) 11(1):91-101.
28. Simon, H. A. 1999. The Sciences of the Artifical. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
29. Tate, A. 2003. 〈I-N-C-A〉: An ontology for mixed-initiative synthesis tasks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Intelligent Systems (MIIS) at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), Acapulco, Mexico, pages 125-130.
30. 2-Intelligent process panels to support coalition operations. In Proceedings of the Second International. Conference on Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations (KSCO-2002), Toulouse, France, pages 184-190.
31. Vogiazou, Y., M. Eisenstadt, M. Dzbor, and J. Komzak. 2005. From buddyspace to cititag: Large-scale symbolic presence for community building and spontaneous play. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Santa Fe, NM, pages 1600-1606.
32. Whitelock, D., D. M. Romano, A. Jelfs, and P. Brna. 2000. Perfect presence: What does that mean for the design of virtual learning environments? Education and Information Technology 5(5):227-289.