DOES BIOETHICS NEED MORAL THEORY?

Value Inquiry Book Series

Volumn 144, Issue , 2003, Pages 35-45

  Garrard, Eve ^a   Wilkinson, Stephen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142783766     PISSN: 09298436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1163/9789401200967_008     Document Type: Chapter

References (9)

1. See D. McNaughton, "Consequentialism," Routledge Encyclopaedia ofPhilosophy Online, ed. Edward Craig, http://www.rep.routIedge.com!.
2. See W. D. Ross, The Right and the Good (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930).
3. See Peter Railton, "Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands ofMorality," Consequentialism and Its Critics, ed. Samuel Scheffler (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).
4. See Nancy Davis, "Contemporary Deontology," Companion to Ethics, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).
5. See Ross, The Right and the Good.
6. See David McNaughton and Piers Rawling, "On Defending Deontology," Ratio, 11:1 (1998).
7. See J. L. Mackie, Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harrnondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977), ch. 1.
8. See Bernard Williams, Morality (Harrnondsworth: Penguin Books, 1973).
9. See Jonathan Dancy, Moral Reasons (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993), ch. 4.