Recurrent network with large representational capacity

Neural Computation

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1917-1942

  Domijan, Drazen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RIJEKA   (Croatia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 3142783362     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/0899766041336422     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Albright, T. D., & Stoner, G. R. (2002). Contextual influences on visual processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 339-379.
2. Averbeck, B. B., Chafee, M. V., Crowe, D. A., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2002). Parallel processing of serial movements in prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 13172-13177.
3. Beck, D. M., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 645-650.
4. Becker, M. W., Pashler, H., & Anstis, S. M. (2000). The role of iconic memory in change detection tasks. Perception, 29, 273-286.
5. Cesmeli, E., & Wang, D. L. (2000). Motion segmentation based on motion/brightness integration and oscillatory correlation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 11, 935-947.
6. Cesmeli, E., & Wang, D. L. (2001). Texture segmentation using gaussian-Markov random fields and neural oscillator networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 12, 394-404.
7. Davis, G., Driver, J., Pavani, F., & Shepherd, A. (2000). Reapprising the apparent costs of attending to two separate visual objects. Vision Research, 40, 1323-1332.
8. Davis, G., Welch, V. L., Holmes, A., & Shepherd, A. (2001). Can attention select only a fixed number of objects at a time? Perception, 30, 1227-1248.
9. Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
10. Gray, C. M. (1999). The temporal correlation hypothesis of visual feature integration: Still alive and well. Neuron, 24, 31-47.
11. Grossberg, S. (1988). Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanism, and architectures. Neural Networks, 1, 17-61.
12. Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 141-171.
13. Grossberg, S., & Todorović, D. (1988). Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 241-277.
14. Grossberg, S., & Wyse, L. (1991). A neural network architecture for figure-ground separation of connected scenic figures. Neural Networks, 4, 723-742.
15. Hauser, M., & Mel, B. W. (2003). Dendrites: Bug or feature? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 372-383.
16. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
17. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
18. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 1-11.
19. Kaski, S., & Kohonen, T. (1994). Winner-take-all networks for physiological models of competitive learning. Neural Networks, 7, 973-984.
20. Lamme, V. A. F. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1605-1615.
21. Lamme, V. A. F., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, V., & Spekreijse, H. (1999). Separate processing dynamics for texture elements, boundaries and surfaces in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 406-413.
22. Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neuroscience, 23, 571-579.
23. Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149-164.
24. Lee, T. S. (2003). Computations in the early visual cortex. Journal of Physiology - Paris, 97, 121-139.
25. Mack, A. (2003). Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 180-184.
26. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Marcus, D. S., & van Essen, D. C. (2002). Scene segmentation and attention in primate cortical areas V1 and V2. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2648-2658.
28. Mel, B. W. (1994). Information processing in dendritic tree. Neural Computation, 6, 1031-1085.
29. Milner, P. M. (1974). A model of visual shape recognition. Psychological Review, 81, 521-535.
30. Mingolla, E., Ross, W. D., & Grossberg, S. (1999). A neural network for enhancing boundaries and surfaces in synthetic aperture radar images. Neural Networks, 12, 499-512.
31. Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352.
32. Opara, R., & Wörgötter, F. (1998). A fast and robust cluster update algorithm for image segmentation in spin-lattice models without annealing - Visual latencies revisited. Neural Computation, 10, 1547-1566.
33. Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 29-55.
34. Peterson, M. A. (1994). Object recognition processes can and do operate before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 105-111.
35. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994a). Must figure-ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253-259.
36. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994b). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 551-564.
37. Poirazi, P., Brannon, T., & Mel, B. W. (2003). Pyramidal neuron as two-layer neural network. Neuron, 37, 989-999.
38. Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341-423.
39. Rensink, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
40. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
41. Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., & Spekreijse, H. (2000). The implementation of visual routines. Vision Research, 40, 1385-1411.
42. Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., Spekreijse, H., & Bosch, H. (2002). Figure-ground segregation in recurrent network architecture. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 525-537.
43. Ross, W. D., Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (2000). Visual cortical mechanisms of perceptual grouping: Interacting layers, networks, columns and maps. Neural Networks, 13, 571-588.
44. Rossi, A. P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2001). Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex of macaques. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 1698-1709.
45. Shadlen, M. N., & Movshon, J. A. (1999). Synchrony unbound: A critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron, 24, 67-77.
46. Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.
47. Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Schnur, T., & Levin, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 78-97.
48. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
49. Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24, 49-65.
50. Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 555-586.
51. Spratling, M. W., & Johnson, M. H. (2001). Dendritic inhibition enhances neural coding properties. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 1144-1149.
52. Spratling, M. W., & Johnson, M. H. (2002). Preintegration lateral inhibition enhances unsupervised learning. Neural Computation, 14, 2157-2179.
53. Terman, D., & Wang, D. L. (1995). Global competition and local cooperation in a network of coupled oscillators. Physica D, 81, 148-176.
54. van Hateren, J. H., & van der Schaaf, A. (1998). Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 265, 359-366.
55. van Rullen, R., & Koch, C. (2003). Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects. Journal of Vision, 3, 75-85.
56. Vecera, S. P. (2000). Toward a biased competition account of object-based segregation and attention. Brain and Mind, 1, 353-384.
57. Vecera, S. P., Flevaris, A. V., & Filapek, J. C. (2004). Exogenous spatial attention influences figure-ground assignment. Psychological Science, 15, 20-26.
58. Vecera, S. P., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1998). Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: An interactive account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 441-462.
59. von der Malsburg, C. (1981). The correlation theory of brain function (Int. Rep. 81-2). Göttingen: Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry.
60. von der Malsburg, C., & Schneider, W. (1986). A neural cocktail-party processor. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 29-40.
61. Wang, D. (1999) Object selection based on oscillatory correlation. Neural Networks, 12, 579-592.
62. Wang, D. L. (2000). On connectedness: A solution based on oscillatory correlation. Neural Computation, 12, 131-139.
63. Wang, D. L., & Terman, D. (1997). Image segmentation based on oscillatory correlation. Neural Computation, 9, 805-836.
64. Wersing, H., Steil, J. J., & Ritter, H. (2001). A competitive-layer model for feature binding and sensory segmentation. Neural Computation, 14, 357-387.
65. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
66. Wolfe, J. M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories (pp. 71-94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Wolfe, J. M., Oliva, A., Horowitz, T. S., Butcher, S. J., & Bompas, A. (2002). Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research, 42, 2985-3004.
68. Yuille, A. L., & Grzywacz, N. M. (1989). A winner-take-all mechanism based on presynaptic inhibition feedback. Neural Computation, 1, 334-347.
69. Zipser, K., Lamme, V. A. F., & Schiller, P. H. (1996). Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 7376-7389.