Validation of comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke survivors

Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 287-294

  Lin, Jau Hong ^a   Lo, Sing Kai ^c   Chang, Yong Yuan ^a   Su, Chwen Yng ^a   Liu, Ching Kuan ^b  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Construct validity; Frenchay Activities Index; Functional Independence Measure; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PARAMETER; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; TAIWAN; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 3142740864     PISSN: 02575655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1607-551x(09)70120-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Melvin JL, Whyte J. Evaluation of stroke: a review. In: Chino N, Melvin JL, eds. Functional Evaluation of Stroke Patients. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1996:1-8.
2. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J 1965;14:61-5.
3. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986;1:59-74.
4. van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66:480-4.
5. Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81 (Suppl 2):S21-9.
6. Kelly-Hayes M, Robertson JT, Broderick JP, et al. The American Heart Association stroke outcome classification. Stroke 1998; 29:1274-80.
7. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000;31:1429-38.
8. Spector WD, Fleishman JA. Combining activities of daily living with instrumental activities of daily living to measure functional disability. J Gerontol Soc Sci 1998;53B:S46-57.
9. Unsworth C, Warburg CL. Assessment and intervention strategies for cognitive and perceptual dysfunction. In: O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, eds. Physical Rehabilitation: Assessment and Treatment. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 2001:961-99.
10. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78: 161-5.
11. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP. A cross-validation of the comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living after stroke. Scand J Rehab Med 1999;31:83-8.
12. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activity index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983;12:166-70.
13. Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Hewer RL. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med 1985;7:176-81.
14. Schuling J, de Haan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke 1993;24:1173-7.
15. Bond MJ, Harris RD, Smith DS, Clark MS. An examination of the factor structure of the Frenchay Activities Index. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14:27-9.
16. Segal ME, Schall RR. Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke 1994;25: 2391-7.
17. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, et al. The functional independence measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1101-8.
18. Ravaud JF, Delcey M, Yelnik A. Construct validity of the functional independence measure (FIM): questioning the unidimensionality of the scale and the "value" of FIM scores. Scand J Rehab Med 1999;31:31-41.
19. Stroke-1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Report of the WHO task force on stroke and other cerebrovascular disorders. Stroke 1989;20:1407-31.
20. International Classification of Diseases: Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Disease, Injuries, and Causes of Death, 9th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1977.
21. TM instrument), version 5.1. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997.
22. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehab Med 1994;26:115-9.
23. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:531-6.
24. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 1995;17:10-4.
25. Kiess HO. Statistical Concepts for Behavioral Sciences. London: Allyn & Bacon, 1989.
26. th edition. Melbourne: School of Psychology, Deakin University, 1997.