Ultrasound differentiation of benign versus malignant solid breast masses

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 166-169

  Murad, Moazzam ^a   Bari, Vaqar ^a  

^a AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Benign; Malignant; Mammography; Solid breast masses; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; SOLID TUMOR; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR VOLUME; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 3142731905     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential. Cancer 1987; 33: 33-48.
2. Miller AB. The costs and benefits of breast cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 1993; 9: 175-80.
3. Fletcher SW. Why question screening mammography for women in their forties? Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33: 1259-71.
4. Hilton SW, Leopold GR, Olson LK,Wilson SA. Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 479-86.
5. Rubin E, Miller VE, Berland LL, Han SY, Koehler RE, Stanley RJ. Hand held real time breast sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144: 623-7.
6. Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurth AB, Goldberg BB. Ultrasound mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 1980; 18:133-43.
7. Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano RZ, Kurth AB, Goldberg BB. Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140: 369-75.
8. Egan RL, Egan KL. Automated water-path full breast sonography: correlation with histology of 176 solid lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 143: 499-507.
9. Sickles EA, Filly FA, Callen PW. Breast cancer detection with ultrasonography and mammography: comparison using state of the art equipment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 1140: 843-5.
10. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Lindfords KK. Whole breast US imaging: 4-year follow-up. Radiology 1985; 157: 505-7.
11. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, Gold RH, Sarti D,King W III. Automated and hand held breast ultrasound: effect on patient management. Radiology 1987; 165:103-8.
12. Fornage BD, Lorigan JG, Andry E. Fibroadenoma of the breast: US appearance. Radiology 1989; 172: 671-5.
13. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radilology 1995; 196: 123-34.
14. American College of Radiology{ACR}. Breast imaging reporting and data system {BI-RADS} 2nd ed. Reston Va: Am Coll Radiol 1995.
15. Baker JA, Soo MS. The evolving role of sonography in evaluating solid breast masses. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000; 21: 246-96.
16. Jackson VP. The current role of ultrasonography in breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33: 1161-70.
17. Fornage BD, Coan JD, David CL. Ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the breast and other interventional procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 167-85.
18. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, US guided automated large core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187: 507-11.
19. Bassett LW, Ysrael M, Gold RH, Ysrael C. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age. Radiology 1991; 180: 831-5.
20. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207: 191-9.
21. Smith DN. Breast ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am 2001; 39: 485-97.
22. Svensson WE. The value of ultrasound scanning in breast disease. Hosp Med 2000; 61: 233-9.
23. Mehta TS. Current uses of ultrasound in the evaluation of the breast. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 841-56.
24. Rubio IT, Henry-Tillman R, Klimberg VS. Surgical use of breast ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83: 771-88.
25. Donaldson LA, Cliff A, Gardiner L, Hubbard AE, Ashton MA. Surgeon-controlled ultrasound-guided core biopsies in the breast: a prospective study and a new use for surgeons in the clinic. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29: 139-42.
26. Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL, Vranken KL, Borstlap AC, Von-Meyenfeldt MF, et al. Interexamination variation of whole breast ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 328-31.
27. Gufler H, Buitrago Tellez CH, Madjar H, Allmann KH, Uhl M, Rohr Reyes A. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 217-21.
28. Evans WP. Breast masses: appropriate evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33: 1085-108.
29. The uniform approach to breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees. Diagn Cytotopathol 1997; 16: 295-311.z