Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer

Cancer Detection and Prevention

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 43-51

  Montaño, Daniel E ^a   Selby, Joseph V ^b   Somkin, Carol P ^b   Bhat, Aradhana ^b   Nadel, Marion ^c  

^a BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude; Behavioral theory; Colorectal cancer screening; Sigmoidoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLIABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SIGMOIDOSCOPE; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CALIFORNIA; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLIABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SIGMOIDOSCOPES; SIGMOIDOSCOPY;

EID: 3142711535     PISSN: 0361090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2003.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Winawer S.J., Fletcher R.H., Miller L.et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 112:1997;594-642.
2. Vernon S.W. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 89:1997;1-17.
3. Ries LAG, Miller BA, Hankey BF, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973-1991: tables and graphs. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication no. 94-2789; 1994.
4. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973-1997. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2000.
5. Thiis-Evensen E., Hoff G.S., Sauar J.et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark polyp study I. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 34(4):1999;414-420.
6. Selby J.V., Friedman G.D., Quesenberry Jr. C.P.et al. A case-control study of sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 326:1992;653-657.
7. Frazier A.L., Colditz G.A., Fuchs C.S.et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA. 284:2000;1954-1961.
8. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: report of the US Preventive Services Task Force. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: William & Wilkins; 1996.
9. Smith R.A., Cokkinides V., von Eschenbach A.C.et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin. 52(1):2002;8-160.
10. Paskett E.D., Rushing J., D'Agostino R.et al. Cancer screening behaviors of low-income women: the impact of race. Womens Health. 3:1997;203-226.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer, United States, 1997 and 1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50:162-6.
12. McCarthy B.D., Moskowitz M.A. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance. J. Gen. Int. Med. 8:1993;120-125.
13. Trnka Y.M., Henderson C.A. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: patient acceptance. HMO Pract. 11:1997;130-133.
14. Pignone M., Bucholtz D., Harris R. Patient preferences for colon cancer screening. J. Gen. Int. Med. 14:1999;432-437.
15. Lembo T., Fitzgerald L., Matin K.et al. Audio and visual stimulation reduces patient discomfort during screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 93:1998;1113-1116.
16. Dumot J.A., Verzola E., Nicol S.et al. Sublingual hyoscayamine for patient comfort during screening sigmoidoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 48:1998;283-286.
17. Kelly R.B., Shank J.C. Adherence to screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Med. Care. 30:1992;1029-1042.
18. Bat L., Pines A., Ron E.et al. A community-based program of colorectal screening in an asymptomatic population: evaluation of screening tests and compliance. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 81:1986;647-651.
19. Olnyk J.K., Aquilia S., Letcher D.R.et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk subjects: a community-based pilot project. Med. J. Aust. 165:1996;74-76.
20. Brenes G.A., Paskett E.D. Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening. Prev. Med. 31(4):2000;410-416.
21. Wardle J., Sutton S., Williamson S.et al. Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. Prev. Med. 31(4):2000;323-334.
22. Montaño D.E., Thompson B., Taylor V.M.et al. Understanding mammography intention and utilization among women in an inner city public hospital clinic. Prev. Med. 26:1997;817-824.
23. Kasprzyk D., Montaño D.E., Fishbein M. The application of an integrated behavioral model to predict condom use: a prospective study among high HIV risk groups. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(17):1998;1559-1585.
24. Fishbein M, Bandura A, Triandis HC, et al. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. Final report, theorists workshop. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1992.
25. Cronbach L.J., Azuma H. Internal-consistency reliability formulas applied to randomly sampled single-factor tests: an empirical comparison. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 22:1962;645-666.
26. Edwards AL. An introduction to linear regression and correlation. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1976.
27. Holt W.S. Jr. Factors affecting compliance with screening sigmoidoscopy. J. Fam. Pract. 32:1991;564-566.
28. Lewis S.F., Jensen N.M. Screening sigmoidoscopy: factors associated with utilization. J. Gen. Int. Med. 11(9):1996;542-544.