Computer-assisted survey interviewing of school-age children

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 129-137

  Rew, Lynn ^a   Horner, Sharon D ^a   Riesch, Lou ^a   Cauvin, Roger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Roger Cauvin Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted survey interviewing; Data management; Longitudinal survey; School age children; Validity

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CHILD; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 3142708898     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200404000-00006     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. McLean, Va: International Medical Publishing Inc; 2000.
2. Brener ND, Collins JL. Co-occurrence of health-risk behaviors among adolescents in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 1998;22:209-213.
3. Kann L, Warren CW, Harris WA, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 1993. J Sch Health. 1995;65:162-171.
4. Rew L, Horner SD. Resilience framework for reducing health-risk behaviors in youth. J Pediatr Nurs. 2003;18:379-388.
5. Knapp TR. Quantitative Nursing Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1998.
6. Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:99-106.
7. Aquilino WS, Wright DL, Supple AJ. Response effects due to bystander presence in CASI and paper-and-pencil surveys of drug use and alcohol use. Substance Use Misuse. 2000;35:845-867.
8. Ellen JM, Gurvey JE, Pasch L, et al. A randomized comparison of A-CASI and phone interviews to assess STD/HIV-related risk behaviors in teens. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31:26-30.
9. Millstein SG. Acceptability and reliability of sensitive information collected via computer interview. Educ Psychol Measurement. 1987;47:523-533.
10. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, et al. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280:867-873.
11. Williams ML, Freeman RC, Bowen AM, et al. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000;12:199-213.
12. Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, et al. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:294-297.
13. Mensch BS, Hewett PC, Erulkar AS. The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: a methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography. 2003;40:247-268.
14. Norusis MJ. SPSS® 8.0 Guide to Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1998.
15. Supple AJ, Aquilino WS, Wright DL. Collecting sensitive self-report data with laptop computers: impact on the response tendencies of adolescents in a home interview. J Res Adolesc. 1999;9:467-488.
16. Van Griensven F, Supawitkul S, Kilmarx PH, et al. Rapid assessment of sexual behavior, drug use, human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases in Northern Thai youth using audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing and noninvasive specimen collection. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):e13. Accessed September 8, 2003.
17. Riley ED, Chaisson RE, Robnett TJ, et al. Use of audio computer-assisted self-interviews to assess tuberculosis-related risk behaviors. Am J Crit Care Med. 2001;164:82-85.
18. Dixon SD, Stein MT. Encounters With Children: Pediatric Behavior and Development. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000.
19. Lessler JT, O'Reilly JM. Mode of interview and reporting of sensitive ssues: design and implementation of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing. NIDA Res Monogr. 1997;167:366-382.
20. Graue ME, Walsh DJ. Studying children in context: theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage. 1998.
21. Question mark's perception. Available at: http://www.questionmark.com/us/ perception/index.htm. Accessed September 29, 2003.
22. Im E-O, Chee W. A feminist critique on the use of the internet in nursing research. Adv Nurs Sci. 2001;23(4):67-82.