Investigations of protein structure and function using the scientificliterature: An assignment for an undergraduate cell physiology course

Cell Biology Education

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 248-255

  Mulnix, Amy B ^a  

^a EARLHAM COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Assignment; Literature; Poster; Protein; Undergraduate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CELL FUNCTION; COLLEGE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CURRICULUM; GROUP DYNAMICS; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PEER REVIEW; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RESEARCH; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTITUDE; AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; CELL PHYSIOLOGY; COMMUNICATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; FACULTY; GROUP PROCESSES; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; PROTEINS; READING; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TIME FACTORS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 3142694985     PISSN: 15367509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.03-06-0025     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Edwards, R., White, M., Gray, J., and Fischbacher, C. (2001). Use of a journal club and letter-writing exercise to teach critical appraisal to medical undergraduates. Med. Educ. 35, 691-694.
2. Herman, C. (1999). Reading the literature in the jargon-intensive field of molecular genetics. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 28(4), 252-254.
3. Higher Education Data Sharing Consortium and Franklin and Marshall College. (2002). Weighted Baccalaureate Origins Study.
4. Janick-Buckner, D. (1997). Getting undergraduates to critically read and discuss primary literature. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 27(1), 29-32.
5. Levine, E. (2001). Reading your way to scientific literacy. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 31(2), 122-125.
6. Mulnix, A., and Penhale, S. (1997). Modeling the activities of scientists: A literature review and poster presentation. Am. Biol. Teach. 59 (8), 482-487.
7. National Research Council. (2003). Biology 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8. NSF Division of Undergraduate Education. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering and technology. A report on the review of undergraduate education from the Committee for the Review to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources. http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/documents/review/ 96139/start.htm (accessed June 3, 2003).
9. PKAL. (2003). What works: Programs. http://www.pkal.org/template2.cfm? c_id=258 (accessed June 6, 2003).
10. Rothman, F.G., and Narum, J.L. (1999). Then, now, and in the next decade: A commentary on strengthening undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering and technology education. Project Kaleidoscope.
11. Stephenson, W.K. (1993). A departmental approach to bibliographic instruction. In: Bibliographic Instruction in Practice, eds. Hardesty, L., Hastreider, J., and Henderson, D., Ann Arbor MI: Pierian Press.