Difference in standard scores of adults on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (Revised and Third Edition)

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 714-718

  Pankrats, Mary ^a   Morrison, Andrea ^a   Plante, Elena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Language disorders; Vocabulary

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PEABODY PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST REVISED; PEABODY PICTURE VOCABULARY TEST THIRD EDITION; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 3142580848     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/054)     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Benton, A., & des Hamsher, K. (1978). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: AJA Associates.
2. Campbell, J., Bell, S., & Keith, L. (2001). Concurrent validity of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition as an intelligence and achievement screener for low SES African American children. Assessment, 8(1), 85-94.
3. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
4. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997a). Examiner's manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
5. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997b). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
6. Gray, S., Plante, E., Vance, R., & Henrichsen, M. (1999). The diagnostic accuracy of four vocabulary tests administered to preschool-aged children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 196-206.
7. Plante, E., Gomez, R., & Gerken, L. (2002). Sensitivity to word order cues by normal and language/learning disabled adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35, 452-463.
8. Plante, E., Shenkman, K., & Clark, M. (1996). Classification of adults for family studies of developmental language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 661-667.
9. Plante, E., Van Petten, C., & Senkfor, A. J. (2000). Electrophysiological dissociation between verbal and nonverbal semantic processing in learning disabled adults. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1669-1684.
10. Morice, R., & McNicol, D. (1985). The comprehension and production of complex syntax in schizophrenia. Cortex, 21, 567-580.
11. Stockman, I. (2000). The new Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III: An illusion of unbiased assessment? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 340-353.
12. Tomblin, B. J., Freese, P. R., & Records, N. L. (1992). Diagnosing specific language impairment in adults for the purpose of pedigree analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 832-843.
13. Ukrainetz, T., & Blomquist, C. (2002). The criterion validity of four vocabulary tests compared to a language sample. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 18(1), 59-78.
14. Ukrainetz, T., & Duncan, D. (2000). From old to new: Examining score increases on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 336-339.
15. Washington, J., & Craig, H. (1999). Performances of at-risk, African American preschoolers on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 75-82.
16. Williams, K. T. (1998). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III: What is new and different? Clinical Connection, 11(3), 6-8.
17. Williams, K. T., & Wang, J. J. (1997). Technical references to the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.