Relations among linguistic and cognitive skills and spoken word recognition in adults with cochlear implants

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 496-508

  Collison, Elizabeth A ^a,b   Munson, Benjamin ^a   Carney, Arlene Earley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Nonverbal IQ; Phonological neighborhood density; Spoken word recognition; Vocabulary size

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COGNITION; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; IMPLANTATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHONETICS; PREDICTION; SKILL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; STANDARDIZATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOWEL; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COGNITION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 3142580342     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/039)     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Beckman, M., & Edwards, J. (2000). The ontogeny of phonological categories and the primacy of lexical learning in linguistic development. Child Development, 71, 240-249.
2. Blamey, P. J., Pyman, B. C., Gordon, M. G., Clark, G. M., Brown, A. M., Dowell, R. C., et al. (1992). Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 101, 342-348.
3. Blamey, P. J., Sarant, J. Z., Paatsch, L. E., Barry, J. G., Bow, C. P., Wales, R. J., et al. (2001). Relations among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 264-285.
4. Boothroyd, A. (1968). Speech recognition test development. In E. Elkins (Ed.), Speech recognition by the hearing impaired (ASHA Report No. 14, pp. 2-7). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
5. Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-3, Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
6. Cleary, M., Dillon, C., & Pisoni, D. (2002). Imitation of nonwords by deaf children after cochlear implantation: Preliminary findings. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 111, 91-96.
7. Cleary, M., Pisoni, D. B., & Kirk, K. I. (2000). Working memory spans as predictors of word recognition and receptive vocabulary in children with cochlear implants. Research on Spoken Language Processing, 24, 3-20.
8. Donaldson, G. S., & Nelson, D. A. (2000). Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1645-1658.
9. Dowell, R. C., Clark, G. M., Seligman, P. M., & Brown, A. M. (1986). Perception of connected speech without lipreading, using a multi-channel hearing prosthesis. Acta Otolaryngologica, 102, 7-11.
10. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
11. Edwards, J., Fox, R., & Rogers, C. (2002). Final consonant discrimination in children: Effects of phonological disorder, vocabulary size, and articulatory accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 231-242.
12. Elliot, L. L., Hammer, M. A., & Evan, K. E. (1987). Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 150-157.
13. Frisch, S. (2001). Emergent phonotactic generalizations in English and Arabic. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 159-179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Fryauf-Bertschy, H., Tyler, R. S., Kelsay, D. M. R., Gantz, B. J., & Woodworth, G. G. (1997). Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: The influences of age at implant and length of device use. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 183-199.
15. Gantz, B. J., Woodworth, G. G., Abbas, P. J., Knutson, J. F., & Tyler, R. S. (1993). Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 102, 909-916.
16. Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 468-492.
17. Gernsbacher, M. (1997). Group differences in suppression skill. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 4, 175-184.
18. Grosjean, F. (1996). Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.
19. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 98, 122-149.
20. Kirk, K. L. (1999). Assessing speech perception in listeners with cochlear implants: The development of the Lexical Neighborhood Tests. Volta Review, 100, 63-85.
21. Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Miyamoto, R. C. (1997). Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1395-1405.
22. Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Osberger, M. J. (1995). Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 16, 470-481.
23. Lyxell, B., Andersson, J., Andersson, U., Arlinger, S., Bredberg, G., & Harder, H. (1998). Phonological representation and speech understanding with cochlear implants in deafened adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 175-179.
24. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Warren, P. (1994). Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features. Psychological Review, 101, 653-675.
25. Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 47-56.
26. Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89-120). New York: Erlbaum.
27. Miyamoto, R. T., Osberger, M. J., Todd, S. L., Robbins, A. M., Stroer, B. S., Zimmerman-Phillips, S., et al. (1994). Variables affecting implant performance in children. Laryngoscope, 104, 1120-1124.
28. Munson, B. (2001). Relations between vocabulary size and spoken word recognition in children aged 3 to 7. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 28, 20-29.
29. Munson, B., Donaldson, G., Allen, S., Collison, E., & Nelson, D. (2003). Patterns of phoneme misperceptions by listeners with cochlear implants varying in overall speech perception ability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 925-935.
30. Pisoni, D. B., Nusbaum, H. C., Luce, P.A., & Slowiaczek, L. M. (1985). Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication, 4, 75-95.
31. Pitt, M., & McQueen, J. (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 347-370.
32. Punch, J. L., Robbins, A. M., Myres, W. A., Pope, M. L., & Miyamoto, R. T. (1987). Relations among selected measures of single-channel cochlear implant performance. Ear and Hearing, 8, 37-43.
33. Sarant, J. Z., Blamey, P. J., Cowan, R. S., & Clark, G. M. (1997). The effect of language knowledge on speech perception: What are we really assessing? The American Journal of Otology, 18, S135-S137.
34. Skinner, M. W., Holden, L. K., Holden, T. A., Demorest, M. E., & Fourakis, M. S. (1997). Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3766-3782.
35. Syntrillium, Inc. (1996). Cool Edit (Version 1.2) [Computer software]. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
36. van Dijk, J. E., van Olphen, A. F., Langereis, M. C., Mean, L. H. M., Brokx, J. P. L., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1999). Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology, 38, 109-116.
37. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.
38. Vitevitch, M., Pisoni, D., Kirk, K., Hay-McCutcheon, M., & Yount, S. (2002). Effects of phonotactic probabilities on the processing of spoken words and nonwords by adults who were postlingually deafened. Volta Review, 102, 283-302.
39. Walley, A. C., Michela, V. L., & Wood, D. R. (1995). The gating paradigm: Effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 343-351.
40. Waltzman, S. B., Cohen, N. L., Gomolin, R. L., Green, J. E., Shapiro, W. H., Hoffman, R. A., et al. (1997). Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants. The American Journal of Otology, 18, 342-349.
41. Williams, K. (1997). Expressive Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
42. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.