ANIMAL CELL;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ARTICLE;
BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY;
CHO CELL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DRUG ANTAGONISM;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG INHIBITION;
DRUG MECHANISM;
DRUG RECEPTOR BINDING;
DRUG STRUCTURE;
DRUG SYNTHESIS;
IC 50;
LIPIDOSIS;
NONHUMAN;
RAT;
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;
G.A. Kennett, M.D. Wood, F. Bright, B. Trail, G. Riley, V. Holland, K.Y. Avenell, T. Stean, N. Upton, S. Bromidge, I.T. Forbes, A.M. Brown, D.N. Middlemiss, and T.P. Blackburn Neuropharmacology 36 1997 609
S. Roever, D.R. Adams, A. Benardeau, J.M. Bentley, M.J. Bickerdike, A. Bourson, I.A. Cliffe, P. Coassolo, J.E.P. Davidson, C.T. Dourish, P. Hebeisen, G.A. Kennett, A.R. Knight, C.S. Malcolm, P. Mattei, A. Misra, J. Mizrahi, M. Muller, R.H.P. Porter, H. Richter, S. Taylor, and S.P. Vickers Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 2005 3604
N2 reaction was determined by means of chiral HPLC using 2% ethanol in heptane as mobile and Chiralpak-AD as stationary phase. Confirmation of the absolute configuration of the C5a- and C9 carbon was carried out by crystallization and X-ray of (5aR,9R)-2-chloro-9- methyl-5a,6,8,9-tetrahydro-(5H)-pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]pyrrolo[1,2-a] pyrazine-7-carboxylic acid 1,1-dimethylethyl ester, which was synthesized according to Scheme 2. CCDC 288646 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
14
0032858740
R.H. Porter, K.R. Benwell, H. Lamb, C.S. Malcolm, N.H. Allen, D.F. Revell, D.R. Adams, and M.J. Sheardown Br. J. Pharmacol. 128 1999 13
2C receptor subtype were counted and plated into standard 96-well microtiter plates on the day before testing to give a confluent monolayer. The cells were then loaded with the calcium-sensitive dye, Fluo-3-AM. Unincorporated dye was removed using an automated cell washer to leave a total volume of 100 μL/well of assay buffer (Hanks, balanced salt solution containing 20 mM Hepes and 2.5 mM probenecid). The drug (dissolved in 50 μL of the assay buffer) was added at a rate of 70 μL/s to each well of the FLIPR 96-well plate during fluorescence measurements. The measurements were taken at 1 s intervals and the maximum fluorescent signal was measured (approx 10-15 s after drug addition) and compared with the response produced by 10 μM 5-HT (defined as 100%) to which it was expressed as a percentage response (relative efficacy). Dose-response curves were constructed using Graphpad Prism (Graph Software Inc.).
19
0034899208
S.P. Vickers, C.T. Dourish, and G.A. Kennett Neuropharmacology 41 2001 200