Visual perception of tree forms

Building and Environment

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 796-806

  Müderrisoǧlu, Haldun ^a   Eroǧlu, Engin ^a   Özkan, Şükran ^a   Ak, Kivanç ^a  

^a ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Tree form; Visual perception; Visual quality; Visual strength

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; GRAPHIC METHODS; PLANTS (BOTANY); SENSORY PERCEPTION; URBAN PLANNING; VISION;

GRAPHICAL VISION; PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS; PYRAMID FORMS; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD; TREE FORM; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL QUALITY; VISUAL STRENGTH;

FORESTRY;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; GRAPHIC METHODS; PLANTS (BOTANY); SENSORY PERCEPTION; URBAN PLANNING; VISION;

PERCEPTION; VISUALIZATION;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; GRAPHIC METHODS; TREES; VISION;

EID: 31344458980     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bernantzky A. The contribution of tree and green spaces to a town climate the impact of climate on planning and building. Sequoia S.A., The Netherlands: Elsevier; 1982. p. 301-11
2. R.S. Ulrich Human responses to vegetation and landscapes Landscape and Urban Planning 13 1986 29-44
3. R.S. Ulrich R.F. Simons B.D. Losito E. Fiorito M.A. Miles M. Zelson Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments Journal of Environmental Psychology 11 1991 201-230
4. Nilsson K, Randrup TB. Urban and peri-urban forestry. Proceedings of the XI world forestry congress. Vol. 1 Antalya/Turkey. 1997. p. 97-110.
5. Ünlü A. Çevresel Tasari̇mda İlk Kavramlar. İTU Kütüphanesi. İTU Mimarli⊙k Fak. Baski⊙ Atölyesi. İstanbul/Turkey. 1998; Sayi⊙ 1604 [in Turkish].
6. Daniel TC, Boster RS. Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. USDA forest service research paper RM-167, 1976.
7. Brown TC, Daniel TC. Modeling forest scenic beauty: Concepts and application to ponderosa pine. USDA forest service research paper RM-256, 1984.
8. R. Ribe The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preferences research taught us? Environmental Management 13 1989 55-74
9. L. Tahvanainen L. Tyrvainen M. Ihalainen N. Vuorela O. Kolehmainen Forest management and public perceptions-visual versus verbal information Landscape and Urban Planning 53 2001 53-70
10. R. Kaplan S. Kaplan The experience of nature. a psychological perspective 1989 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
11. B. Shelby R. Harris Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: Site visits, photographs and written descriptions Journal of Leisure Research 17 1 1985 57-67
12. L.M. Anderson Land use designations affect perception of scenic beauty in forest landscape Forest Science 27 2 1981 392-400
13. R.B. Hull W.P. Stewart Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgements Journal of Environmental Psychology 12 1992 101-114
14. D. Habron Visual perception of wildland in Scotland Landscape and Urban Planning 42 1 1988 45-56
15. L. Tyrvainen L. Tahvanainen Using computer graphics for assessing the scenic value of large-scale rural landscape Forthcoming Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14 1999 282-288
16. J. Summit R. Sommer Further studies of preferred three shapes Environment and Behavior 31 4 1999 550-576
17. http://www.adapazari-bld.gov.tr
18. http://www.die.gov.tr
19. Devlet Planlama Teşkilati⊙, Düzce İli Raporu. Bölgesel Gelişme ve Yapi⊙sal Uyum Genel Müdürlüǧü. Yayi̇n No: 2578. Ankara. 2001 [in Turkish].
20. İl Turizm Müdürlüǧü, Cumhuriyetin 75. Yi̇li⊙nda Bolu. Bolu, 1998 [in Turkish].
21. L. Hannebaum Landscape design 1981 Reston Pub. Inc Virginia
22. T.H. Wang Plan and section drawing 1979 VNR Inc New York 0-442-26127-6 (cloth)
23. Pasley ADG. Herbaceous plants and bulbs. In: Clouston B. editor, Landscape design with plants. The Landscape Institute. Hampshire, 1990. p. 76-85. ISBN 0-7506-19627.
24. C.E. Osgood W.H. May M.S. Miron Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning 1975 University of Illinois Press Urbana
25. Özdamar K. Statistical data analyze with computer software program. Eskişehir, Turkey, 1999. ISBN: 975-6768-00-7, [in Turkish].
26. Fisher JD, Bell PA, Baum A. Environmental psychology. 2nd ed. NY, USA, 1984. ISBN 0-03-059867-2.
27. A. Serpa A. Muhar Effects of plant size, texture and colour on spatial perception in public green areas - a cross-cultural study Landscape and Urban Planning 36 1 1999 19-25
28. E. Strumse Demographic differences in the visual preferences for agrarian landscapes in western Norway Journal of Environmental Psychology 16 1 1996 17-31
29. L. Elizabeth Demographic correlates of landscape preferences Environment and Behavior 15 4 1983 487-511
30. R.E. Manning Crowding norms in backcountry settings: A review and synthesis Journal of Leisure Research 17 2 1985 75-89