Development of a comprehensiveness of Rasch measurement application scale

Journal of Applied Measurement

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 92-116

  Lamprianou, Iasonas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Agrafon 22A ^*  (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM;

ENGLAND; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 31344449006     PISSN: 15297713     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573.
2. Cammilli, G., Wang, M., and Fesq, J. (1995). The effects of dimensionality on equating the Law School Admission Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32, 79-96.
3. Dorans, N. J., and Kingston, N. M. (1985). The effects of violations of unidimensionality on the estimation of item and ability parameters and on item response theory equating of the GRE verbal scale. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 249-262.
4. Douglas, G., and Wright, B. D. (1987). Response patterns and their probabilities. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 3(4), 75-77.
5. Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., and Williams, E. A. (1985). Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 67-86.
6. Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., and Zickar, M. J. (1996). Optimal identification of mismeasured individuals. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 47-64.
7. Fisher, Jr., W. P. (1995) Opportunism, a first step to inevitability? Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9(2), 426.
8. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., and Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Karabatsos, G. (2000). A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 152-176.
10. Klauer, K. C. (1991). An exact and optimal standardized person test for assessing consistency with the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 56(2), 213-228.
11. Klauer, K. C. (1995). The assessment of person fit. In G H. Fischer and I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 97-110). New York: Academic Press.
12. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hilldale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
13. McDonnald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 100-117.
14. Meijer, R. R., and Sijtsma, K. (1999). A review of methods for evaluating the fit of item score patterns on a test. Research Report 99-01, Enschede: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
15. Meijer, R. R., Molennar, I. W., and Sijtsma, K. (1994). Influence of test and person characteristics on nonparametric appropriateness measurement. Applied Psychological Mesurement, 18(2), 111-120.
16. Meijer, R. R., Muijtjens, A. M. M., and Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1995). Nonparametric person-fit research: Some theoretical issues and an empirical example. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 77-89.
17. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research. (Expanded edition, 1980. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.)
18. Smith, R. M, Linacre, J. M., Smith, Jr., E. V. (2003). Guidelines for manuscripts. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4, 198-204.
19. Smith, R. M. (1991). The distributional properties of Rasch item fit statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 541-565.
20. Smith, R. M. (1996). A comparison of methods for determining dimensionality in Rasch measurement. Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), 25-40.
21. Smith, R. M. (2000). Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1, 199-218.
22. Smith, R. M., Schumacker, R. E., and Bush, M. J. (1998). Using Item Mean Squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 66-78.
23. Stout, W. (1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait dimensionality. Psychometrika, 52, 589-618.
24. Tatsuoka, K. K., and Linn, R. L. (1983). Indices for detecting unusual patterns: Links between two general approaches and potential applications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(1), 81-96.
25. Traub, R. E. (1983). A priori considerations in choosing an item response model. In R. K. Hambleton (Ed.), Applications of Item Response Theory. British Columbia: Educational Research Institute of British Columbia.
26. Wright, B. D. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 97-116.
27. Wright, B. D. (1990). Rasch measurement models. In Walberg and Haertel (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of educational evaluation. Oxford, Great Britain: Pergamon Press.
28. Wright, B. D. (1993). Data analysis and fit, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 324-325.
29. Wright, B. D., and Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.
30. Wright, B. D. (1996). Comparing Rasch measurement and factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 3(1), 3-24.
31. Wright, B. D., and Mok, M. (2000). Rasch models overview. Journal of Applied Measurment, 7, 83-106.
32. Wright, B. D., and Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.
33. Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., and Wilson, M. R. (1998). ConQuest: Generalized item response modelling software. [Computer program.] Victoria, Australia: ACER.