Optimal Identification of Mismeasured Individuals

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 47-64

  Drasgow, Fritz ^a   Levine, Michael V ^a   Zickar, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030531907     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame0901_5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Becker, T. E., & Colquitt, A. L. (1992). Potential versus actual faking of a biodata form: An analysis among several dimensions of item type. Personnel Psychology, 45, 389-406.
2. Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
3. Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R., & Muraki, E. (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261-280.
4. Candell, G. L. (1988). Application of appropriateness measurement to a problem in adaptive testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Champaign.
5. Candell, G. L., & Levine, M. V. (1989). Appropriateness measurement for computerized adaptive tests (Rep. No. AFHRL-TP-89-15). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Manpower and Personnel Division.
6. Drasgow, F. (1995). Introduction to the polytomous IRT special issue. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 1-3.
7. Drasgow, F., & Guertler, E. (1987). A decision-theoretic approach to the use of appropriateness measurement for detecting invalid test and scale scores. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 10-18.
8. Drasgow, F., & Levine, M. V. (1986). Optimal detection of certain forms of inappropriate test scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 59-67.
9. Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., & McLaughlin, M. E. (1987). Detecting inappropriate test scores with optimal and practical appropriateness indices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 59-79.
10. Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. D. (in press). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19.
11. Evangelauf, J. (1989, April 5). Publishing mergers seen threatening quality of standardized tests. Chronicle of Higher Education, 35(30), A2.
12. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
13. Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983). Item response theory: Application to psychological measurement. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
14. Kendall, M., & Stuart, A. (1979). The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. 2, 4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
15. Lehmann, E. L. (1959). Testing statistical hypotheses. New York: Wiley.
16. Levine, M. V. (1984). An introduction to multilinear formula score theory. Champaign: University of Illinois, Model-Based Measurement Laboratory.
17. Levine, M. V., & Drasgow, F. (1988). Optimal appropriateness measurement. Psychometrika, 53, 161-176.
18. Levine, M. V., & Rubin, D. F. (1979). Measuring the appropriateness of multiple choice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 269-290.
19. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
20. McKinley, R. L., & Reckase, M. D. (1983). An extension of the two-parameter logistic model to the multidimensional latent space (Research Rep. No. ONR 83-2). Iowa City, IA: The American College Testing Program.
21. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for Educational Research.
22. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monographs, 34(4, Pt. 2).
23. Samejima, F. (1980). Estimation of the operating characteristic when the test information of the old test is not constant: II. Simple sum procedure of the conditional P.D.F. approach/normal approach method using three subtests of the old test (Research Rep. No. ONR/RR-80-4). Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.
24. Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 567-577.
25. Zickar, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (in press). Detecting faking on a personality instrument. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19.