Evaluating new surgical techniques in Australia: The Australian safety and efficacy register of new interventional procedures-surgical experience

Surgical Clinics of North America

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 115-128

  Maddern, Guy J ^a,b   Middleton, Philippa F ^a   Tooher, Rebecca ^a   Babidge, Wendy J ^a,b  

^a ROYAL AUSTRALASIAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAFETY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

AUSTRALIA; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRACTICE GUIDELINES; REGISTRIES; REVIEW LITERATURE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 31344448798     PISSN: 00396109     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.10.010     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. L. Audigé, M. Bhandari, and D. Griffin Systematic reviews of nonrandomised clinical studies in the orthopaedic literature Clin Orthop Relat Res 427 October 2004 249 257
2. Green S. When should we believe the results? Quality issues in surgical research. Plenary address at the Annual Scientific Congress, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Melbourne, Australia, May 4, 2004.
3. N. Mills, J.L. Donovan, and M. Smith Perceptions of equipoise are crucial to trial participation: a qualitative study of men in the ProtecT study Control Clin Trials 24 3 2003 272 282
4. J. Deeks, J. Dinnes, and R. D'Amico Evaluating nonrandomised intervention studies Health Technol Assess 7 27 2003 iii-x; 1-173