Systematic selection and implementation of graphical user interface metaphors

Computers and Education

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 385-397

  Cates, Ward Mitchell ^a  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human computer interface; Interactive learning environments; Multimedia hypermedia systems; Navigation

Indexed keywords

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; NAVIGATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERFACES; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; INTERFACE DESIGNS; MULTIMEDIA/HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY-BASED LEARNING;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 31244436884     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00064-1     Document Type: Note

References (33)

1. Alty, J. L., & Knott, R. P. (1999). Metaphor and human-computer interaction: A model based approach. In C. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents (pp. 307-321). Berlin: Springer.
2. Alty, J. L., Knott, R. P., Anderson, B., & Smyth, M. (2000). A framework for engineering metaphor at the user interface. Interacting with Computers, 13, 301-322. (Pubitemid 32034767)
3. Bugelski, B. R. (1971). The definition of the image. In S. J. Segal (Ed.), Imagery: current cognitive approaches (pp. 49- 68). New York: Academic.
4. Carroll, J., & Mack, R. (1999). Metaphor, computing systems, and active learning. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 51, 385-403.
5. de Bono, E. (1967). The use of lateral thinking. London: Cape.
6. Dent-Read, C. H., Klein, G., & Eggleston, R. (1994). Metaphor in visual displays designed to guide action. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9, 211-232.
7. Erickson, T. (1990). Working with interface metaphors. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human computer interface design (pp. 65-73). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Furukawa, J. (1970). Chunking method of determining size of step in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 247-254.
9. Gibbs Jr., R. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Reviews, 99, 572-577.
10. Hamilton, A. (2000). Interface metaphors and logical analogies: A question of terminology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 111-122. (Pubitemid 30527157)
11. Hron, A. (1998). Metaphors as didactic means for multimedia learning environments. Innovations in Education and Training, 3(1), 21-28.
12. Kittay, E. F. (1987). Metaphor: its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford: Clarendon.
13. Kosslyn, S. (1983). Ghosts in the mind's machine: creating and using images in the brain. New York: Norton.
14. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press Chicago.
15. Langer, S. (1958). Language and creative thought. In C. M. Babcock (Ed.), Ideas in process. (pp. 125-136). New York: Harper and Brothers.
16. Mac Cormac, E. (1985). A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Magritte, R. (1929). La trahison des images [The treachery of images]. Oil on canvas, 60-18 cm. CA: Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
18. Marcus, A. (1998). Metaphor design in user interface. Journal of Computer Documentation, 22(2), 43-57.
19. Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
20. Miller, G. (1979). Images and models, similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-250). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mountford, S. J. (1990). Tools and techniques for creative design. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human computer interface design (pp. 17-30). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Muscari, P. G. (1988). The metaphor in science and in the science classroom. Science Education, 72, 423-431.
23. Nehaniv, C. (1999). Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents. In C. Nehaniv (Ed.), Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents (pp. 1-10). Berlin: Springer.
24. Nelson, T. (1990). The right way to think about software design. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human computer interface design (pp. 235-243). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25. Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination (3rd ed.). New York: Scribner.
26. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
27. Paivio, A. (1979). Psychological processes in comprehension of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 150-171). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual encoding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Pugh, S., Hicks, J. W., & Davis, M. H. A. (1997). Metaphorical ways of knowing: The imaginative nature of thought and expression. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
30. Rosendahl-Kreitman, K. (1990). The challenge of interface design: creating a quality experience for the user. In Multimedia [user] interface design (pp. 1.3-1.23). Santa Clara, CA: Multimedia Computing Corporation.
31. Sato, K., Shiratori, N., Nunokawa, H., Kusumi, T., & Noguchi, S. (1997). A user interface metaphor for distributed systems. Electronics and Communications in Japan, 80(11), 82-92. (Pubitemid 127589152)
32. Searle, J. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92-123). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Trevail, R., & Chafetz, R. (1996). The metaphoric hammer: driving messages home through the use of metaphor in an EPSS. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 96-world conference in educational media and hypermedia (pp. 679-684). Charlottesville, VA: Association for Advancement of Computing Education.