Syntactic movement in orally trained children with hearing impairment

Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 56-75

  Friedmann, Naama ^a   Szterman, Ronit ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH THERAPY; TEACHING;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPREHENSION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; SPEECH THERAPY; TEACHING;

EID: 31144461597     PISSN: 10814159     EISSN: 14657325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enj002     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adams, C. (1990). Syntactic comprehension in children with expressive language impairment. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 25, 149-171.
2. Agbayani, B. (2000). Wh-subjects in English and the vacuous movement hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 703-712.
3. Berent, G. P. (1988). An assessment of syntactic capabilities. In M. Strong (Ed.), Language learning and deafness (pp. 133-161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bošković, Ž., & Nunes, J. (2002). The copy theory of movement: A view from PF. Presented in Mayfest 2002, The Minimalist Fact, University of Maryland, College Park.
5. Brannon, J. B. (1966). The spoken syntax of normal, hard of hearing and deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 9, 604-610.
6. Brannon, J. B. (1968). Linguistic word classes in the spoken language of normal, hard of hearing, and deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 279-287.
7. Calderon, R., & Naidu, S. (2000). Further support for the benefits of early identification and intervention for children with hearing loss. The Volta Review, 100, 53-84.
8. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
9. Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in linguistics. [Current Studies in Linguistics 36] (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 506-569). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
13. Clements, C. N., McCloskey, J., Maling, J., & Zaenen, A. (1983). String-vacuous rule application. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 1-18.
14. Correa, L. M. S. (1995). An alternative assessment of children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 183-203.
15. De Villiers, P. A. (1988). Assessing English syntax in hearing-impaired children: Elicited production in pragmatically motivated situations. In R. R. Kretchmer & L. W. Kretchmer (Eds.), Communication assessment of hearing-impaired children: From conversation to classroom [Monograph supplement]. The Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 21, 41-71.
16. de Villiers, J., de Villiers, P., & Hoban, E. (1994). The central problem of functional categories in English syntax of oral deaf children. In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Constraints on language acquisition: Studies of atypical children (pp. 9-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Ebbels, S., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2001). Metasyntactic therapy using visual coding for children with severe persistent SLI. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36(Suppl), 345-350.
18. Friedmann, N. (1998). Functional categories in agrammatic production: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
19. Friedmann, N. (2001). Agrammatism and the psychological reality of the syntactic tree. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 71-90.
20. Friedmann, N. (2002). Question production in agrammatism: The Tree Pruning Hypothesis. Brain and Language, 80, 160-187.
21. Friedmann, N. (2006). Speech production in Broca's agrammatic aphasia: Syntactic tree pruning. In K. Amunts & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Broca's region. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Friedmann, N., Bastaker, O., & Shatil, S. (2004). Do young children understand verb movement? Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31, 661-681.
24. Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2005). The comprehension and production of Wh movement in Hebrew-speaking children with syntactic SLI. Presented at the European Group for the Study of Child Language Disorders (EUCLDIS), Abbaye de Royaumont, France.
25. Friedmann, N., Novogrodsky, R., Szterman, R., & Preminger, O. (2005). Resumptive pronouns as last resort when movement is impaired: Relative clauses in hearing impairment. In S. Armon-Lotem, S. Rothstein, & G. Danon (Eds.), Generative approaches to Hebrew linguistics, Series Linguistics Today. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Friedmann, N., & Shapiro, L. P. (2003). Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 46, 288-297.
27. Friedmann, N., Wenkert-Olenik, D., & Gil, M. (2000). From theory to practice: Treatment of agrammatic production in Hebrew based on the Tree Pruning Hypothesis. Neurolinguistics, 13, 250-254.
28. Geers, A. E., & Moog, J. S. (1978). Syntactic maturity of spontaneous speech and elicited imitation of hearing-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 380-391.
29. Geis, J. E. (1973). Creative errors in the writing of deaf children. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 55-66.
30. Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1-71.
31. Hakansson, G., & Hansson, K. (2000). Comprehension and production of relative clauses: A comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language, 27, 313-333.
32. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31-38.
33. Hornstein, N., & Nunes, J. (2002). On asymmetries between parasitic gap and across-the-board constructions. Syntax, 5, 26-54.
34. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-99.
35. Kidd, E., & Bavin, E. L. (2002). English-speaking children's understanding of relative clauses: Evidence for universal-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 599-617.
36. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
37. Levy, H., & Friedmann, N. (2005). Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
38. Marschark, M., Mouradian, V., & Halas, M. (1994). Discourse rules in the language production of deaf and hearing children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 89-107.
39. McAnally, P. L., Rose, S., & Quigley, S. P. (1987). Language learning practices with deaf children. Boston: College-Hill.
40. Novogrodsky, R., & Friedmann, N. (2003). The movement deficit in SLI: Trace deletion or thematic role transfer impairment? In Y. Falk (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th IATL Conference, pp. 1-10.
41. Nunes, J. (2001). Sideward movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 303-344.
42. Power, D. J., & Quigley, S. P. (1973). Deaf children acquisition of the passive voice. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 5-11.
43. Pressnell, L. M. (1973). Hearing-impaired children's comprehension and production of syntax in oral language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 16, 12-21.
44. Quigley, S. P., Smith, N. L., & Wilbur, R. B. (1974). Comprehension of relativized sentences by deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 325-341.
45. Quigley, S. P., Wilbur, R. B., & Montanelli, D. S. (1974). Question formation in the language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 699-713.
46. Sarachan-Deily, A. B., & Love, R. J. (1974). Underlying grammatical rule structures in the deaf. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 689-698.
47. Schmitt, P.J. (1968). Deaf children's comprehension and production of sentence transformations and verb tenses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne.
48. Shlonsky, U. (1987). Null and displaced subjects. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA.
49. Shlonsky, U. (1992). Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 443-468.
50. Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic. New York: Oxford Press.
51. Shlonsky, U., & Doron, E. (1992). Verb second in Hebrew. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (Vol. 10, pp. 431-446). Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University: Stanford, CA.
52. Stavrakaki, S. (2001). Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language, 77, 419-431.
53. Szterman, R., & Friedmann, N. (2004, July). Syntactic movement in comprehension and production in children with hearing impairment. Presented at the 19th Israeli Association for Literacy SCRIPT Conference, Israel.
54. Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (1995). Training sentence production in agrammatism: Implications for normal and disordered language. Brain and Language, 50, 201-224.
55. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Ballard, K. J., Jacobs, B. J., Schneider, S. S., & Tait, M. E. (1997). Training and generalized production of Wh- and NP-movement structures in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 228-244.
56. Tur-Kaspa, H., & Dromi, E. (2001). Grammatical deviations in the spoken and written language of Hebrew-speaking children with hearing impairments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 79-89.
57. Varlokosta, S., & Armon-Lotem, S. (1998). Resumptives and wh-movement in the acquisition of relative clauses in modern Greek and Hebrew. Proceedings of the 22nd Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 22), 737-746. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
58. Yoshinaga-Itano, C. (2003). From screening to early identification and intervention: Discovering predictors to successful outcomes for children with significant hearing loss. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 11-30.
59. Yoshinaga-Itano. C., & Apuzzo, M. L. (1998a). Identification of hearing loss after age 18 months is not early enough. American Annals of the Deaf, 143, 380-387.
60. Yoshinaga-Itano, C., & Apuzzo, M. L. (1998b). The development of deaf and hard of hearing children identified early through the high-risk registry. American Annals of the Deaf, 143, 416-424.
61. Zurif, E. B., Swinney, D. Prather, P. Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448-464.
62. Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Wingfield, A., & Brownell, H. (1995). The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: Evidence from the elderly. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 165-182.