Agrammatic comprehension of simple active sentences with moved constituents: Hebrew OSV and OVS structures

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 288-297

  Friedmann, Naama ^a   Shapiro, Lewis P ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agrammatism; Comprehension; Conduction aphasia; Hebrew; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONDUCTION APHASIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APHASIA, BROCA; APHASIA, CONDUCTION; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037389703     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/023)     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Baker, M., Johnson, K., & Roberts, J. (1989). Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 219-251.
2. Beretta, A., Piñango, M., Patterson, J., & Harford, C. (1999). Recruiting comparative crosslinguistic evidence to address competing accounts of agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 149-168.
3. Biran, M., & Friedmann, N. (2002). The effect of semantic and phonological cueing on the naming of aphasics with deficits in different levels of lexical processing. Israeli Journal of Language, Speech and Hearing Disorders, 24, 21-40. [In Hebrew]
4. Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Sonntag, K. (2001). Does case make the difference? Agrammatic comprehension of case-inflected sentences in German. Cortex, 37, 700-703.
5. Caplan, D. (1983). Syntactic competence in agrammatism A lexical hypothesis. In M. Studdert-Kennedy (Ed.), Psychobiology of language (pp. 177-187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Caplan, D., Baker, C., & Dehaut, F. (1985). Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition, 21, 117-175.
7. Caplan, D., & Futter, C. (1986). Assignment of thematic roles by an agrammatic aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 27, 117-134.
8. Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572-582.
9. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Cinque, G. (1990). Types of A'-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. De Bleser, R., Bayer, J., & Luzzatti, C. (1996). Linguistic theory and morphosyntactic impairments in German and Italian aphasics. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 176-185.
12. Déprez, V., & Pierce, A. (1993). Negation and functional projections in early grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 25-68.
13. Déprez, V., & Pierce, A. (1994). Crosslinguistic evidence for functional projections in early child grammar. In T. Hoekstra & B. T. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 57-84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Dick, E., Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., Utman, J. A., Dronkers, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2001). Language deficits, localization, and grammar: Evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasics and normals. Psychological Review, 108, 759-788.
15. Friedemann, M.-A. (1993/1994). The underlying position of external arguments in French: A study in adult and child grammar. Language Acquisition, 3, 209-255.
16. Friedemann, M.-A. (2000). Early French postverbal subjects. In M.-A. Friedemann & L. Rizzi (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics (pp. 63-83). Geneva, Switzerland: Longman Linguistics Library Series.
17. Friedmann, N. (1998). BAFLA - Friedmann's Battery for Agrammatism. Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University.
18. Friedmann, N. (2001). Agrammatism and the psychological reality of the syntactic tree. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 71-90.
19. Friedmann, N., & Gvion, A. (2003). Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation in aphasia: A dissociation between semantic and phonological encoding. Brain and Language.
20. Friedmann, N., Wenkert-Olenik, D., & Gil, M. (2000). From theory to practice: Treatment of agrammatic production in Hebrew based on the Tree Pruning Hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13, 250-254.
21. Gil, M., & Edelstein, C. (2001). Hebrew version of the PALPA. Ra'anana, Israel: Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center.
22. Grodzinsky, Y. (1989). Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses. Brain and Language, 37, 480-499.
23. Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Grodzinsky, Y. (1995a). A restrictive theory of trace deletion in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 50, 27-51.
25. Grodzinsky, Y. (1995b). Trace deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51, 467-497.
26. Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1-71.
27. Grodzinsky, Y., Pierce, A., & Marakovitz, S. (1991). Neuropsychological reasons for a transformational analysis of verbal passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9, 431-453.
28. Grodzinsky, Y., Piñango, M., Zurif, E., & Drai, D. (1999). The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: Comprehension regularities in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 134-147.
29. Haarmann, H. J., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1997). Aphasic sentence comprehension as a resource deficit: A computational approach. Brain and Language, 59, 76-120.
30. Hagiwara, H., & Caplan, D. (1990). Syntactic comprehension in Japanese aphasics: Effects of category and thematic role order. Brain and Language, 38, 159-170.
31. Hickok, G., Zurif, E., & Canseco-Gonzalez, E. (1993). Structural description of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 45, 371-395.
32. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). PALPA: Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
33. Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
34. Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1988). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85, 211-258.
35. MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35-54.
36. Mauner, G., Fromkin, V., & Cornell, T. L. (1993). Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45, 340-370.
37. Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671-717.
38. Pierce, A. E. (1992). Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
39. Piñango, M. M. (2000). Syntactic displacement in Broca's agrammatic aphasia. In R. Bastiaanse & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia: A neurolinguistic perspective (pp. 75-87). London: Whurr.
40. Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax (pp. 281-337). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
41. Ruigendijk, E., & Friedmann, N. (2002). Not all grammatical words are impaired in agrammatism: Evidence from case production in Hebrew and Dutch. The Israeli Journal of Language, Speech and Hearing Disorders, 24, 41-54. [In Hebrew]
42. Ruigendijk, E., van Zonneveld, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (1999). Case assignment in agrammatism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 962-971.
43. Schaeffer, J. (2000). Aphasia research and theoretical linguistics guiding each other. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 50-51.
44. Schwartz, M., Saffran, E., & Marin, O. (1980). The wordorder problem in agrammatism: I. Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249-262.
45. Shapiro, L. P., Gordon, B., Hack, N., & Killackey, J. (1993). Verb-argument structure processing in complex sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 423-447.
46. Shlonsky, U. (1987). Null and displaced subjects. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
47. Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Shlonsky, U., & Doron, E. (1992). Verb second in Hebrew. In D. Bates (Ed.), The proceedings of the tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 431-446). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
49. Smith, S. D., & Mimica, I. (1984). Agrammatism in a caseinflected language: Comprehension of agent-object relations. Brain and Language, 21, 274-290.
50. Soroker, N. (1997). Hebrew Western Aphasia Battery. Ra'anana, Israel: Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center.
51. Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (1995). Training sentence production in agrammatism: Implications for normal and disordered language. Brain and Language, 50, 201-224.
52. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., & Roberts, M. (1993). Treatment of sentence production deficits in aphasia: A linguistic-specific approach to Wh-interrogative training and generalization. Aphasiology, 7, 111-133.
53. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Tait, M. E., Jacobs, B. J., & Schneider, S. L. (1996). Training Wh-question production in agrammatic aphasia: Analysis of argument and adjunct movement. Brain and Language, 52, 175-228.
54. Wilson, B., Cockburn, C., & Halligan, P. (1987). The Behavioral Inattention Test. Suffolk, England: Thames Valley Test Company.