Mammographic mass detection using a mass template

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 221-228

  Özekes, Serhat ^a   Osman, Onur ^a   Çamurcu, A Yilmaz ^b  

^a ISTANBUL COMMERCE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; Mammography; Mass detection

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 31144459570     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: 12296929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2005.6.4.221     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baines CJ, McFarlane DV, Miller AB. The role of the reference radiologist: Estimates of interobserver agreement and potential delay in cancer detection in the national screening study. Invest Radiol 1990;25:971-976
2. Wallis M, Walsh M, Lee J. A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. Clin Radiol 1991;44:13-15
3. Bird RE. Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. Radiology 1990;177:587
4. Brenner RJ. Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging: variable standards of care relating to different types of practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:719-723
5. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994;191:241-244
6. Vyborny CJ, Giger ML. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:699-708
7. Suckling J, Parker J, Dance D, Astley S, Hutt I, Boggis C, et al. The mammographic images analysis society digital mammogram database. Exerpta Med 1994;1069:375-378
8. Castellino RA, Roehrig J, Zhang W. Improved computer aided detection (CAD) algorithms for screening mammography. Radiology 2000;217:400
9. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Tumor detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 2001;11:2454-2459
10. Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ, Hendriks JH, et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227:192-200
11. Brzakovic D, Neskovic M. Mammogram screening using multiresolution-based image segmentation. Intern J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 1993;7:1437-1460
12. Petrick N, Chan HP, Wei D. An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammograhpic breast mass detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996;15:59-67
13. Chan H, Wei D, Helvie N, Sahiner B, Adler D, Goodsitt M, et al. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. Phys Med Biol 1995;40:857-876
14. Yin FF, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Doi K, Schmidt RA. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses. Invest Radiol 1993;28:473-481
15. Kegelmeyer WP, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994;191:331-337
16. Petrick N, Chan HP, Wei D, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, Adler DD, Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification. Med Phys 1996;23:1685-1696
17. Singh S, Bovis K. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2005;9:109-119