Effects of a Nonrinse Conditioner and 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid on the Etch Pattern of Intact Human Permanent Enamel

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 22-27

  Çehreli, Zafer C ^a,b   Altay, Nil ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Acid etching; Compomer; EDTA; NRC

Indexed keywords

CHELATING AGENT; EDETIC ACID; ITACONIC ACID; MALEIC ACID; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SUCCINIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TIME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CHELATING AGENTS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ENAMEL SOLUBILITY; EDETIC ACID; HUMANS; MALEATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR, THIRD; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; SUCCINATES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034138036     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;38: 849-853.
2. Relief DH, Dreyer CJ, Gavron G. The direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth by means of an epoxy adhesive. Am J Orthod. 1970;58:21-40.
3. Nordenvall KJ, Brännström M, Malmgren O. Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth: a comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching. Am J Orthod. 1980;78: 99-108.
4. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnet AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of enamel etching time on bond strength and morphology. J Clin Orthod. 1985; 19:36-38.
5. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnet AJ, Shaffer SE. Effects of reduced acid concentration and etching time on bond strength and enamel morphology. J Clin Orthod. 1987;21:395-398.
6. Oliver RG. The effects of differing etching times on the etch pattern on enamel of unerupted and erupted human teeth examined using the scanning electron microscope. Br J Orthod. 1987; 14:105-107.
7. Carstensen W. Clinical effects of reduced acid concentration on direct bonding of brackets. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:221-224.
8. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, et al. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:476-483.
9. Thompson RE, Way DC. Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:282-295.
10. Brown CRL, Way DC. Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled adhesives. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:663-671.
11. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:269-283.
12. Millet DT, McCabe JE Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement: a review. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:385-399.
13. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:125-130.
14. Miller JR, Mancl L, Arbuckle G, Baldwin J, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical trial using glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:309-312.
15. Norevall LI, Marcusson A, Persson M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:373-384.
16. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:587-589.
17. Eliades G, Kakaboura A, Palaghias G. Acid-base reaction and flouride release profiles in visible light-cured polyacid-modified composite restoratives (compomers). Dent Mater. 1998;14:57-63.
18. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;108:231-236.
19. Cehreli ZC, Usmen E. Effect of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of compomers to human primary and permanent enamel. Am J Dent. 1999;12:26-30.
20. Millet DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69: 58-63.
21. Hormati AA, Fuller JL, Denehy GE. Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:34-38
22. Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: a SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:329-332.
23. Barghi N, Knight GT, Berry TG. Comparing two methods of moisture control in bonding to enamel: a clinical study. Oper Dent. 1991;16:130-135.
24. Messersmith ML, Devine SM, Zionic AE. Effects of tooth surface preparation on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:503-509.
25. NRC™ non-rinse conditioner. Technical manual [package insert]. Konstanz, Germany: Dentsply DeTrey Gmbh; 1998.
26. Blomlöf J, Blomlöf L, Cederlund AD, Hultenby KR, Lindskog SF. A new concept for etching in restorative dentistry? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19:31-35.
27. Nygaard-Otsby B. Chelation in root canal therapy. Odontol Tidskr. 1957;65:3-11
28. Benderli Y, Yücel T. The effect of surface treatment on the bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Oper Dent. 1999;24:96-102.
29. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon JL, Fejerkov O. Variations in the pattern of acid-etching of human enamel examined by scanning electron microscope. Caries Res. 1975;9:373-387.
30. Galil KA, Wright GZ. Acid etching patterns on buccal surfaces of permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1979;1:230-234.
31. Brännstöm M, Nordenvall KJ, Mamlgren O. The effect of various pretreatment methods of the enamel in bonding procedures. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:522-530.
32. Denys FR, Relief DH. Variations in enamel etching patterns produced by different concentrations of phosphoric acid. J Dent Assoc South Africa. 1982;37:185-189.
33. Silverstone LM. Fissure sealants. Laboratory studies. Caries Res. 1974;8:2-26.
34. Relief DH, The use of 50% phosphoric acid as an etching agent in orthodontics; a rational approach. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:165-178.
35. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnet AJ. Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent. 1986;11:111-116.
36. Sadowsky PL, Relief DH, Cox PR, Herandez-Ortiz R, Rape WG, Bradley EL. Effects of etchant concentration and duration on the retention of orthodontic brackets: An in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;98:417-421.
37. Hallet KB, Garcia-Godoy F, Trotter AR. Shear bond strength of a resin composite to enamel with maleic or phosphoric acid. Aust Dent J. 1994;39:292-297.
38. Osorio R, Toledano M, Garcia-Godoy F. Bracket bonding with 15-or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:45-48.
39. Surmont P, Dermaut L, Martens L, Moors M. Comparison in shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets between five bonding systems related to different etching times: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1992;101:414-419.
40. Sheen DH, Wang WN, Tarng TH. Bond strength of younger and older permanent teeth with various etching times. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:225-230.