Use and disuse of contextual primes in dynamic news environments

Journal of Communication

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 737-755

  Kim, Young Mie ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 31044455342     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/55.4.737     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Althaus, S. L. (2000, September). Presidential communication strategies and evening news coverage of the Gulf Crisis: A preliminary report. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Context effects in political judgment: Assimilation and contrast as a function of categorization processes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 159-172.
4. CBS/New York Times Persian Gulf War polls. (1990-1991). New York: CBS & New York Times.
5. Collins A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82, 407-428.
6. Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 269-280.
7. Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57, 940-949.
8. Higgins, E. T. (1989). Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 75-123). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
10. Higgins, E. T., Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. (1985). Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 59-69.
11. Higgins, E. T., & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some "activation rules" in influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218-243.
12. Higgins, E. T., & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 69-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
14. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963-975.
16. Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundation of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
17. Leopore, L., & Brown, R. (2002). The role of awareness: Divergent automatic stereotype activation and implicit judgment correction. Social Cognition, 20, 321-351.
18. Lombardi, W. J., Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). The role of consciousness in priming effects on categorization: Assimilation versus contrast as a function of awareness of the priming task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 411-429.
19. Long, S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Martin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
21. Martin, L. L., & Achee, J. W. (1992). Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 195-216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R.A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
23. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (1996). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of research on the priming hypothesis. In D. Mutz, P. M. Sniderman, & R. A. Brody (Eds., Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 79-99). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24. Moskowitz, G. B., & Roman, R. J. (1992). Spontaneous trait inferences as self-generated primes: Implications for conscious social judgment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 62, 238-728.
25. Newman, L. S., & Uleman, J. S. (1990). Assimilation and contrast effects in spontaneous trait inference. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 224-240.
26. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluation of the president's performance. Communication Research, 24, 3-30.
27. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication science (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). London: Ablex.
28. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. R. D. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds., Media effects. Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 97-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 429-442.
30. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kubler, A., & Wanke, M. (1993). The salience of comparison standards and the activation of social norms: Consequences for judgments of subjective well-being. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 203-314.
31. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579-616.