Implications of soil tillage for weed communities

Soil Tillage in Agroecosystems

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 147-185

  El Titi, Adel ^a  

^a State Institute for Plant Protection   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; ECOSYSTEMS; VEGETATION;

AGRICULTURAL CROPS; AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS; CROP PLANTS; ENERGY BUDGETS; HUMAN USE; SOIL SURFACES; SOIL TILLAGE;

CROPS;

EID: 31044440209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (217)

1. Moody, K., Weed: definition, costs, characteristics, classification and effects, Splits, 1, 11, 1983.
2. Rademacher, B., Handbuch der Landwirtschaft, Parey-Verlag, Berlin-Hamburg, 310, 1952.
3. Donald, W. W. and Khan, M., Yield loss assessment for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) infested with Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), Weed Sci., 40, 590, 1992.
4. Beer, E., Ermittlung der Bekämpfungsschwelle und wirtschaftlichen Schadenss-chwellen von monokotylen und dikotylen Unkräutern in Winterweizen und Wintergerste anhand von Daten der amtlichen Mittelprüfung, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1979.
5. Beer, E., Praktische Anwendung von Schadensschwellen in Winterroggen, Proc. EWRS Symp. Economic Weed Control, 361, 1986.
6. Wahmhoff, W., Erfahrungen mit der praktischen Anwendung von Schadensschwellen bei der Unkrautbekämpfung im Getreide, Z. PflKrankh. Pfl. schutz, SH XV, 379, 1986.
7. Gerowitt, B. and Heitefuss, R., Weed economic thresholds in the FR Germany, Crop Prot., 9, 323, 1990.
8. Kees H. et al, Unkrautbekämpfung im integrierten Pflanzenschutz, Verlagsunion Agrar, 1993.
9. Cussans, G. W., Cousens, R. D., and Wilson, B. J., Thresholds for weed control-the concepts and their interpretation, Proc. EWRS Symp. Economic Weed Control, 253, 1986.
10. Steinmann, H.-H., Forstreuter, C., and Heitefuss, R., Ökologische und ökonomische Auswirkungen von Exzensivierungsmaßnahmen im Ackerbau-Ergebnisse des Göttinger INTEX-Projektes 1990-1994, Goltze Print, Göttingen, Germany, 1997, 127-149.
11. Marshall, J. P. and Smith, B. D., Field margin flora and fauna; interaction with agriculture, BCPC Monogr., 35, 23, 1987.
12. Kaule, G., Arten-und Biotopschutz, Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 2. Auflage, 1991.
13. Harms, K. H., Philippi, G., and Sybold, S., Verschollene und gefährdete Pflanzen in Baden-Württemberg, 2. Fassung 1983, In: Arten-und Biotopschutzprogramm Baden-Württemberg, 1:III C/12 &III C/28, Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz BW, Karlsrühe, 1991.
14. Lal, R., No-tillage effects on soil properties under different crops in Western Nigeria, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 40, 762, 1976.
15. Lal, R. et al. Conservation tillage in sustainable agriculture, in: Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Edwards, C. A. et al., Eds., Soil and Water Conservation Society publisher, 203, 1990.
16. Carter, M. R., Conservation Tillage in Temperate Agroecosystems, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 1994.
17. Tebruegge, F. and Boehrnsen, A., Experience with the applicability of no-tillage crop production in the west-european countries, Proc. EC Workshop, IV, Boigneville, 1997.
18. Hao, X., Chang, C., and Lindwall, C. W., Tillage and crop sequence effects on organic carbon and total nitrogen content in an irrigated Alberta soil, Soil Tillage Res., 62, 167, 2001.
19. Zan, C. S. et al., Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 86, 135, 2001.
20. Lal, R., A modest proposal for the year 2001: We can control greenhouse gases in the world with proper soil management, J. Soil Water Conserv., 55, 429, 2000.
21. Reicosky, D. C., Dugas, W. A., and Torbert, H. A., Tillage-induced soil carbon dioxide loss from different cropping systems, Soil Tillage Res., 41, 105, 1997.
22. 2 emission from soil, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosyst., 49, 273, 1997.
23. Reicosky, D. C., Conservation agriculture: global environmental benefits of soil carbon management, in Proc. 1st World Congr. Conserv. Agric, A Worldwide Challenge, Madrid, V. I, 3, 2001.
24. Koch, W., Die Unkrautbekämpfung aus dem Blickwinkel des integrierten Pflanzenschutzes, Proc., Int. Symp. IOBC/WPRS Integrated Control Agric. For., Vienna, October 8-12, 1979, 235, 1979.
25. Rieck, C. E., Herbicide effectiveness and weed populations in no-tillage corn, in Proc. Symp. Int. Congr. Plant Prot., Washington, D.C., 9, 65, 1981.
26. Rickson, R. J., Conserving soil resources, European perspectives, CAB Int., 1994, 425.
27. Buchner, W. and Koeller, K., Integrierte Bodenbearbeitung, Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1990, 127.
28. Baker, C. J., Direktsaat: Eine Bestandsaufnahme unter besonderer Berücksichtigung technischer, agronomischer und ökonomischer Aspekte, Ph.D. Thesis 482, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 1996.
29. Baeumer, K., Umweltbewusster Landbau: Zurück zu den Ideen des 19. Jahrhunderts?, Berichte über Landwirtschaft, 64, 153, 1986.
30. Derpsch, R., Implications of no-tillage versus soil preparation on sustainability of agricultural production, Adv. Geoecol., 31, 1175, 1998.
31. Huff, H.-P., Wallmüller, F., and Rose, E., Einfluß winterharter und nicht winterharter Zwischenfrucht auf die Sequenzverunkrautung bei Direktsaat Mais, Z. PflKrankh. Pfl.schutz, SH XI, 345, 1988.
32. Galegari, A., Cover crop management, Proc. Conserv. Agric. A Worldwide Challenge, García-Torres, L., Benites, J., and Martínez-Vilela, A., Eds., 171, 2001.
33. Baeumer, K., Gestaltung “integriert” funktionierender Bodenbearbeitung, in Integrierter Landbau, Systeme umweltbewusster Pflanzenproduktion, Grundlagen, Praxis-verfahren, Entwicklungen, Diercks, R./Heitefuss, R. (Eds.), BLV-Verlaggesellschaften, Munich, Vienna, Zurich, 1990, 60-133.
34. Anon., Definition und Einordnung von Verfahren der Bodenbearbeitung und Bestellung, KTBL-Arbeitsblatt, Nr. 0236, 1993.
35. Derpsch, R., Conservation Tillage, No-tillage an related technologies, Proc. Conserv. Agriculture A Worldwide Challenge, García-Torres, L., Benites, J., and Martínez-Vilela, A., Eds., 161, 2001.
36. CTIC 2000: Conservation Technology Information Center, Core 4, Conservation of Agriculture’s future. http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/core4/CT/Definitions.html.
37. Kranz, J., Schmutterer, H., and Koch, W., Krankheiten, Schädlinge und Unkräuter im tropischen Pflanzenbau, Paul Parey, Berlin and Hamburg, 1979, 669-670.
38. Håkansson, S., Competition between crops and weeds - influencing factors, experimental methods and research needs, in Proc. Symp. Economic Weed Control, 61, 1986.
39. Zwerger, P., Modellierung und Simulation der Populationsdynamic von annuellen Unkräutern, Berichte aus dem Fachgebiet Herbologie der Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 33, 1993.
40. Goldberg, D. E. et al., Density dependence in an annual plant community: Variation among life history stages - Ecol. Monogr., 71, 423, 2001.
41. Stoll, P. and Prati, D., Intraspezific aggregation alters competitive interactions in experimental plant communities, Ecology, 82, 319, 2001.
42. Marshall, E. J. P., Interference between sown grasses and the growth of rhizome of Elymus repens (couch grass), Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 33, 1, 1990.
43. Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, S. H., Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions, Weed Res., 21, 99, 1981.
44. Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, D. S. H., Influence of cultivation regime upon buried weed seeds in arable cropping systems, J. Appl. Ecol., 20, 199, 1983a.
45. Froud-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D. S. H., and Chancellor, R. J., Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems, J. Appl. Ecol., 20, 187, 1983b.
46. Pollard, F. et al., The influence of tillage on the weed flora in a succession of winter wheat crops on a clay loam soil and a silt loam soil, Weed Res., 22, 129, 1982.
47. Moss, S. R., The survival of Alopecurus myosuroides Hud. seeds in soil, Weed Res., 25, 201, 1985.
48. Cussans, G. W. and Moss, S. R., Decision Making in the Practice of Crop Protection. Population Dynamics of Annual Grass Weeds, Proc. 1982 Br. Crop Prot. Symp., Monograph No. 25, 91, 1982.
49. Braeutigam, V., Einfluss langjährig reduzierter Bodenbearbeitung auf die Unkrau-tentwicklung und Bekämpfung, Z. Pfl.krankheiten und Pfl.schutz, SH XII, 219, 1990.
50. Amann, A., Einfluß von Saattermin und Grundbodenbearbeitung auf die Verunkrautung in verschiedenen Kulturen, Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 1991.
51. Knab, W. and Hurle, K., Einfluß der Grundbodenbearbeitung auf Ackerfuchsschwanz (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.), Zeitschr. Pfl.Krankh.Pfl.Schutz, SH.XI, 97, 1988.
52. Schreiber, M. M., Influence of tillage, crop rotation, and weed management on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) population dynamics and corn yield, Weed Sci., 40, 645, 1992.
53. Buhler, D. D., Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems, Weed Sci., 40, 241, 1992.
54. Wilson, B. J., The influence of reduced cultivations and direct drilling on the long-term decline of a population of Avena fatua L. in spring barley, Weed Res., 21, 23, 1981.
55. Roberts, H. A., Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. III. Effect of different primary cultivations on the weed seeds in the soil, Weed Res., 51, 83, 1963a.
56. Roberts, H. A., Studies on the weeds of vegetable crops. IV. Further observations on the effects of different primary cultivations, Weed Res., 323, 1963b.
57. Smith, J. D., Viability of stored bromegrass seed and seedborne spores of a leaf spot pathogen, Phytopathology, 60, 1470, 1970.
58. Rydrych, D. J. and Mutzik, T. J., Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat, Agron. J., 60, 546, 1968.
59. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., and Eckert, R. E., Jr., Population dynamics of downy brome, Weed Sci., 17, 20, 1969.
60. Boatman, N. D., Selective control of Bromus sterilis in field boundaries with fluazifop-P-butyl, in Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf., 349, 1993.
61. Bowerman, P., Rule, J. S., and Freer, J. B. S., Effects of cultivation and soil type on the seed emergence of barren brome, meadow brome and winter barley, in Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf., 317, 1993.
62. Iglesias, A., Chueca, M. C., and Baudin, J. M., Effect of temperature, and hours of sunlight on the emergence of Bromus spp. and implications for weed control, in Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf., 101, 1993.
63. Blackshaw, R. E., Moyer, J. R., and Kozub, G. C., Efficacy of downy brome herbicides as influenced by soil properties, Can. J. Plant Sci., 74, 177, 1994.
64. Froud-Williams, R. J., Pollard, F., and Richardson, W. G., Barren brome: a threat to winter cereals? Report Agricultural Research Council Weed Research Organisation for 1978-1978, 43, 1980.
65. McCloskey, M. et al., The dynamics of experimental arable weed communities under different management practices, J. Vegetation Sci., 7, 799, 1996.
66. McCloskey, M. et al., Interactions between weeds of winter wheat under different fertilizer, cultivation and weed management treatments, Weed Res., 38, 11, 1998.
67. Smith, G. L. et al., The population dynamics of Anisantha sterilis in winter wheat: Comparative demography and the role of management, J. Appl. Ecol., 36, 455, 1999.
68. Runyan, T. J. and Peeper, T. P., Cultural control of Bromus spp. in winter wheat, in Proc. 31st Southern Weed Sci. Soc., 68, 1978.
69. Eggers, T., Environmental inpact of chemical weed control in arable fields in the federal republic of Germany, in Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weed, 267, 1987.
70. Froud-Williams, R. J., Grass weeds in cereals in the U.K. Germination behaviour of Bromus sp. and Alopecurus myosuroides, Grass Weeds in Cereal in the U.K. Conf., 1981.
71. Pallutt, B. and Bennewitz, A., Einfluß von pflugloser Bodenbearbeitung auf die Verunkrautung und den Ertrag von Wintergetreide, Z. Pfl.Krankh. Pfl.Schutz, SH.XV, 325, 1996.
72. Hammerton, J. L., Past and future changes in weed species and weed floras, in Proc. 9th Br. Weed Control Conf., 1136, 1968.
73. Pessala, B., Longevity of Avena fatua seeds in the field, in Proc. 19th Swedish Weed Control Conf., C14-C24, 1978.
74. Garbe, V., Verunkrautung und Auftreten von Schädlingen bei unterschiedlichen Systemen der Bodenbearbeitung zu Zuckerrüben, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1987.
75. Buhler, D. D., Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA, Crop Sci., 35, 1247, 1995.
76. Teasdale, J. R., Beste, C. E., and Potts, W. E., Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue, Weed Sci., 39, 195, 1991.
77. Schilling, G., Einfluß der Mulchsaat bei Zuckerrüben auf die Verunkrautung im Rübenbestand und im nachgebauten Winterweizen, Internal Report, 14, 1995.
78. Pohlan, J. and Borgman, J., Beeinflussung der Populationsdynamik von Unkräutern durch unterschiedliche Systeme der Bodenbearbeitung in Zuckerrüben, Z. Pfl.Krankh. Pfl.Schutz, SH.XV, 341, 1996.
79. Fisk, J. W. et al., Weed suppression by annual legume cover crops in no-tillage corn, Agron. J., 93, 319, 2001.
80. Firbank, L. G., Interactions between weeds and crops, in The Ecology of Temperate Cereal Fields, Firbank, L. G. et al., Eds., Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, 1991, 209-231.
81. Begon, M., Harper, J. L., and Townsend, C. R., Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, 1986.
82. Do Van Long, W. Z., Nährstoffkonkurrenz zwischen Kulturpflanzen und Unkräutern bei gesteigerter Düngung, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gießen, Germany, 1978.
83. Alkaemper, J., Unkrautbewirtschaftung als Beitrag zur Sicherung von Ertrag und Bodenfruchtbarkeit, Ergebnisse landwirtschaftlicher Forschung, Band 18, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gießen, 1977, 9-19.
84. Koch, W. and Hurle, K., Grundlagen der Unkrautbekämpfung, Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 207, pp. 1978.
85. Post, B. J., Factors of Influence on the Development of an Arable Weed Vegetation, in Proc. EWRS Symp. Economic Weed Control, 317, 1986.
86. Firbank, L. G. et al., Effects of soil type on crop yield-weed density relationships between winter wheat and Bromus sterilis, J. Appl. Ecol., 27, 308, 1990.
87. Hamilton, E. W. and Frank, D. A., Can plants stimulate soil microbes and their own nutient supply? Evidence from a grazing tolerant grass, Ecology, 82, 2397, 2001.
88. Amberger, A., Dicyandiamid (“Didin”) als Nitrifikationshemmstoff, Bayer. Landw. Jahrbuch, 58, 845, 1981.
89. Solansky, S., Stickstoffdynamik und Stickstoffverluste im Boden, Die Bodenkultur, Journal für landwirtschaftliche Forschung, SH 33, 185, 1982.
90. Solansky, S., Möglichkeiten zur Steuerung des N-Angebotes im Zuckerrübenanbau, II RB, Symposium “Stickstoff und Zuckerrüben”, Brüssel, 373, 1983.
91. Love, S. L. et al., Cultivar and seed pieces spacing effects on potato competitiveness with weeds, Am. Potato J., 72, 197, 1995.
92. El Titi, A. and Landes, H., Integrated Farming System of Lautenbach: A practical contribution towards sustainable agriculture in Europe, in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Edwards, C. A. et al., Eds., Soil and Water Conservation Society publisher, 265, 1990.
93. Alemán, F., Common Bean Response to Tillage Intensity and Weed Control Strategies, Agron. J. 93, 556, 2001.
94. Wang, R. and Kok, L. T., Bindweeds and their biological control, Biocontrol News Inf., 6, 303, 1985.
95. Giannopolitis, C. N. and Chrysayi, M., 1986: Possibilities of biological control of Convolvulus arvensis in vegetable crops, in Weed Control in Vegetable Production, Cavalloro, R. and El Titi, A., Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, 1988, 147-152.
96. Vogelsang, S. et al, Effect of the pre-emergence bioherbicide Phomopsis convolvulus on seedling and established plant growth of Convolvulus arvensis, Weed Res., 38, 175, 1998.
97. Whitworth, J. W. and Muzik, T. J., Differential response of selected clones of bind-weed to 2,4D, Weeds, 15, 275, 1967.
98. Yerkes, C. N. and Weller, S. C, Diluent volume influences susceptibility of field bind-weed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate, Weed Technol., 10, 565, 1996.
99. Gerowitt, B., Herbizideinsatz in Zuckerrüben-Verunkrautung, Kosten und Wirkung in Versuchen der Landwirtschaftskammer Hannover von 1990-1999, Z. Pfl.krankh. Pfl.schutz, SH XVIII, 477, 2002.
100. Shear, G. M., The role of herbicides in no-tillage crop production, Agric. Chem., 20, 31, 1965.
101. Guennigmann, A. and Rohde, H., Herbaflex- a new selective herbicide for post emergence control of mono- and dicotyledonous weeds in winter cereals, Z. Pfl.krankh. Pfl.schutz, SH XVIII, 703, 2002.
102. Zadocks, J. C., Comments on the research methodology for DFS, Development of farming systems, Evaluation of a five-year period 1980-1984, Pudoc Wageningen, 1989.
103. Vereijken, P., A methodic way to more sustainable farming systems, Netherlands J. Agric. Sci., 40, 209, 1992.
104. Vereijken, P., A methodical way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms, Eur. J. Agron., 7, 235, 1997.
105. El Titi, A., Lautenbacher Hof, Abschlußbericht 1978-1994, Ein langfristiger Vergleich integrierter und konventioneller Bewirtschaftungssysteme im Ackerbau in Baden-Württemberg, Agrarforschung in Baden-Württemberg, 30, 1999, 103 pp.
106. EL Titi, A., Boller, E., and Gendrier, J. P., Integrated production, principles and technical guidelines, IOBC/WPRS Bull., 16, 1993, 1-97.
107. Derksen, D. A. et al., Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems, Weed Sci., 41, 409, 1993.
108. Donaghy, D. I., Zero-tillage crop production in Manitoba, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manitoba, 1973.
109. Donaghy, D. I., Zero-tillage in relation to Canada thistle, in Proc. Can. Thistle Symp. Agric. Can., 87, 1980.
110. Buhler, D. D. et al., Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices, Weed Sci., 42, 205, 1994.
111. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D., Weed spectrum change and control in reduced-till wheat, N.D. Farm Res., 43, 11, 1995.
112. Donald, W. W., Management and control of Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense, Rev. Weed Sci., 193, 1990.
113. Donald, W. W., Primary tillage for foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) control, Weed Technol., 4, 318, 1990.
114. Bachtaler, G., Entwicklung der Unkrautflora in Deutschland in Abhängigkeit von den veränderten Kulturmethoden, Angew. Botanik, 43, 59, 1969.
115. Håkansson, S. and Wallgren, B., Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. III. The development from reproductive roots cut into different lengths and planted at different depths, with and without competition from barley, Swedish J. Agric. Res., 2, 15, 1972.
116. Hacker, E., Untersuchungen zum Einfluss des Lichtes auf den Lebenszyklus der Gemeinen Quecke (Agropyron repens [L.] P.B.) vor populationsdynamischem Hintergrund, Ph.D. Thesis, University Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 1984.
117. Pollard, F. and Cussans, G. W., The influence of tillage on the weed flora in a succession of winter wheat on a loam soil, Weed Res., 21, 185, 1981.
118. Nalewaja, J. D., Weeds and Conservation Agriculture, Proc. Conserv. Agric. A World-wide Challenge, García-Torres, L., Benites, J. and Martínez-Vilela A., Eds., 191, 2001.
119. Bilalis, D., Efthimiadis, P., and Sidiras, N., Effect of three tillage systems on weed flora in a 3-year rotation with four crops, J. Agron. Crop Sci., 186, 135, 2000.
120. Knab, W., Auswirkung wendender und nichtwendender Grundbodenbearbeitung auf die Verunkrautung in Abhängigkeit von Fruchtfolge und Unkrautbekämpfung, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 1988.
121. Shapiro, C. A. et al, Tillage and Management Alternatives for Returning Conservation Reserve Program Land to Crops, Agron. J., 93, 850, 2001.
122. Ehlers, W. and Claupein, W., Approaches toward conservation tillage in Germany, in Conservation Tillage in Temperate Agroecosystems, Carter, M. R., Ed., Lewis Publisher, Boca Raton, 1994, 141.
123. El Titi, A., Die nicht-wendende Bodenbearbeitung und der Pflanzenschutz: Auswirkungen auf die Ackerunkräuter, LU-J., 12, 9, 1996.
124. Alkaemper, I., Pessios, E., and Do Van Long, W.Z., Einfluß der Düngung auf die Entwicklung und Nährstoffaufnahme verschiedener Unkräuter in Mais, in Proc. EWRS Symp. Influence Different Factors on Development and Control of Weeds, 181, 1979.
125. Gill, K. S. and Arshad, M. A., Weed flora in the early growth period of spring crops under conventional, reduced, and zero tillage systems on a clay soil in northern Alberta, Canada, Soil Tillage Res., 33, 65, 1995.
126. Bischoff, A. and Mahn, E.-G., The effects of nitrogen and diaspore availability on the regeneration of weed communites following extensification, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 77, 237, 2000.
127. Krebs, C. J., Species diversity, Ecology, in The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, Harper & Row, New York, 1978, 449-487.
128. Odum, E. P., The strategy of ecosystem development, Science, 164, 262, 1969.
129. Odum, E. P., Basic ecology, CBS College Publishing, Philadelphia, 1983.
130. Ellenberg, H., Ökosystemforschung, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973, 208 pp.
131. Otte, A., Populationsbiologische Parameter zur Kennzeichnung von Ackerwild-kräutern, Z. PflKrankh. Pfl.schutz, SH XV, 45, 1996.
132. Jedruszczak, M., Bujak, K., and Wesolowski, M., The Impact of Tillage Systems on Weed Community on Loessial Soil in the Region of Lublin, in Proc. 14th Conf. of ISITRO, 1997, 299-302.
133. Coffman, C.B., and Frank, J. R. Corn-weed interactions with long-term conservation tillage management, Agron. J., 87, 17, 1992.
134. Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Harrison, K., Long-term tillage effects on seed banks in three Ohio soils, Weed Sci., 39, 186, 1991.
135. El Titi, A., Veränderungen der Unkrautzusammensetzungen nach 16 Jahren integrierter Bewirtschaftung auf dem Lautenbacher Hof, Z. Pfl. Krankh. Pfl.schutz, SH XV, 201, 1996.
136. Shannon, C. D. and Weaver, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana, IL, 1963.
137. Gerowitt, B. et al., Versuche zur Erarbeitung von Kriterien für EDV-gestützte Entscheidungshilfen zur Unkrautbekämpfung im Wintergetreide. Z.PflKrankh. Pfl.schutz, SH XV, 351, 1986.
138. Diercks, R. and Heitefuss, R., Bodennutzungssysteme, in: Integrierter Landbau, Systeme umweltbewusster Pflanzenproduktion Grundlagen Praxisverfahren, Entwick-lungen, Diercks, R. and Heitefuss, R., Eds., BLV-Verlaggesellschaften, Munich, Vienna, Zurich, 2nd ed., 1994, 10-135.
139. Cavalloro, R. and El Titi, A., Weed Control in Vegetable Production, Balkema Rotterdam Brookfield, 1988, diverse chapters.
140. Jordan, V. W. and Donaldson, G. V., Concept of implementation strategies for rotational weed control in non-inversion tillage systems, Aspects Appl. Biol., 47, 221, 1996.
141. Dawson, J. H., The concept of period thresholds, in Proc. EWRS Symp. Economic Weed Control, 327, 1986.
142. Lueang, A. et al., Wirkung einer Unkrautkonkurrenz auf die Entwicklung der Sommergerste in Abhängigkeit von Unkrautart, Konkurrenzdauer und Stickstoffdüngung, in: Proc. EWRS-Symp. Economic Weed Control, 113, 1986.
143. El Titi, A., Unkrautkonkurrenz im Zuckerrübenanbau und ihre praktische Ausnutzung, Z. Pfl.krankh. Pflschutz, 93, 136, 1986.
144. Ammon, H. U. und Kunz., P., Einfluß der Unkrautkonkurrenz zu bestimmten Entwick-lungsstadien auf den Ertrag der Zuckerrüben, Mitt. der Schweiz. Landwirtschaft, SH: Unkrautbekämpfung, 30, 1982.
145. Heitefuss, R., Auswirkungen von Unkräutern und Maßnahmen der Unkrautbekämp-fung auf andere Kriterien als den Ertrag, Z.PflKrankh.Pfl.schutz, SH XV, 189, 1986.
146. Audus, L. J., Ed., Herbicides, Biochemistry, Ecology, Vol. 1 and 2, Academic Press, London, 1976.
147. Dowe, A. and Decker, H., Unkräuter als Wirte zystenbildender Nematoden, Nach-richtenbl.Pflschutz, DDR, 39, 139-141, 1985.
148. Hoestetter, W., Untersuchungen zur Schadwirkung und zur Populationsdynamik von einjährigem Bingelkraut (Mercurials annua L.), Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gießen, Germany, 1986.
149. Obst, A. und Paul, H. P., Krankheiten und Schädlinge des Getreides, Verlag Th. Mann, Gelsenkirchen-Buer, 1993.
150. Power, A. G., Cropping systems, insect movement, and the spread of insect-transmitted diseases in crops, in Agroecology, Researching the Ecological Basis for Sustainable Agriculture, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989, 47-82.
151. Duffus, J. E., Role of weeds in the incidence of virus diseases, Annu. Rev. Phyto-pathol., 9, 319, 1971.
152. Tonhasca, A., Jr. and Stinner, B. R., Effects of strip intercropping and no-tillage on some pests and beneficial invertebrates of corn in Ohio, Environ. Entomol., 20, 1251, 1991.
153. Marshall, E. J. P., Joenje, W., and Burel, F., European research network on field margin ecology, in Field Margins-Integrating Agriculture and Conservation, Monograph No. 58, British Crop Protection Council, 1994, 403-404.
154. Nentwig, W. and Poehling, H.-M., Agrarökologie: Nützlinge und Schädlinge an künstlich angelegten Ackerkrautstreifen in Getreidefeldern, Band 4, Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern, 1992, 1-140.
155. Große-Wichtrup, L., Steiner, H., and Wipperfürth, T., Der Einfluß von Klee als Untersaat auf die Populationsdynamik von Blattläusen (Homoptera, Aphididae) und epigäischen Arthropoden bei Winterweizen im Lautenbach-Projekt, Mitt. Ges. allg. angew. Entom., 4, 429, 1985.
156. Werner, A., Einfluss von Beipflanzen zwischen den Reihen von Mais auf die Unkrau-tpopulation und deren Verwendung zur biologischen Unkrautbekämpfung in integrierten Verfahren, in Proc. EWRS Symp. 1986 Economic Weed Control, 169, 1986.
157. Hutchings, M. J., Ed., The structure of plant populations, Plant Ecol., 1986, 97-136.
158. Turkington, R., Leaf and flower demography of Trifolium repens L., 1. Growth in mixture with grasses, New Phytologist, 93, 599, 1983.
159. Lovett-Doust, L., Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats, J. Ecol., 69, 743, 1981.
160. Dias, L. S. and Moreira, L., Allelopathic interactions between crops and weeds, in Weed Control in Vegetable Production, Coavalloro and El Titi, A., Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, 1988, 197-211.
161. Tauscher, B., Allelochemicals-eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung, Z. PflKrankh. Pfl.schutz, SH XI, 15, 1988.
162. Law, J. H. and Regnier, F. E., Pheromones, Annu. Rev. Biochem, 40, 533, 1971.
163. Kohli, R. K., Singh, H. P., and Batish, D. R., Eds., Allelopathy in Agroecosystems, Haworth Press, 2001, 447 pp.
164. Holzner, W., Concepts, categories and characteristics of weeds, in Biology and Ecology of Weeds, Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1982.
165. Petersen, J. et al., Weed suppression by release of isothiocyanates from turnip rape mulch, Agron. J. 93, 37, 2001.
166. Nikolai, H., Isolierung und Strukturaufklärung allelopathisch wirksamer Substanzen aus Agropyron repens, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Heidelberg, Germany 1982.
167. Schilling, D. G., Liebel, R. A., and Worsham, A. D., Rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mulch: The suppression of certain broadleaved weeds and the isolation and identification of phytotoxins, in The Chemistry of Allelopathy, Biochemical Interactions among Plants, Thompson, A. C., Ed., ACS Symposium Series 268, 1995, 243-271.
168. Redfern, M., Insects and thistles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney, 1983, 1-64.
169. Davis, B. N. K., Insects on Nettles, Cambridge University Press 1983, 1-64.
170. Knauer, N., Ökologie und Landwirtschaft, Situation-Konflikte-Lösungen, Ulmer-Verlag, 1993, pp. 280.
171. Nentwig, W. und Poehling, H.-M., Agrarökologie: Unkräuter in der Agrarlandschaft locken blühendende Nutzinsekten an -Band 1, Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern, 1991, pp. 104.
172. El Titi, A., Zum ökonomischen Nutzen von Ackerunkräutern im integrierten Pflanzenschutz, dargestellt am Zuckerrübenanbau, in Proc. EWRS Symp. Economic Weed Control 1986, 209-216.
173. Salveter, R., The influence of sown herb strips and spontaneous weeds on the larval stages of aphidophagous hoverflies (Dip., Syrphidae), J. Appl. Entomol., 122, 193, 1998.
174. Frank, T., Density of adult hoverflies (Dipt., Syrphidae) in sown weed strips and adjacent fields, J. Appl. Entomol., 123, 351, 1999.
175. Ulber, B., Untersuchungen zur Nahrungswahl von Onychiurus fimatus Gisin(Onychiuridae, Collembola), einem Auflaufschädling der Zuckerrübe, Z. angew. Entom., 90, 333, 1980.
176. Frank, T. and Barone, M., Short-term field study on weeds reducing slug feeding on oilseed rape, Z. Pfl.Krankh. Pfl.Schutz 106, 534, 1999.
177. Briner, T. and Frank, T., The palatability of 78 wildflower strip plants to the slug Arion lusitanicus, Ann. Appl. Biol., 133, 123, 1998.
178. Gliessmann, S., Agroecology, Springer Verlag, New York, 1990, 380 pp.
179. Andow, D. A., The extent of monoculture and its effects on insect pest populations with particular reference to wheat and cotton, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 9, 25, 1982.
180. Letoureau, D. K., Two examples of natural enemy augmentation: A consequence of crop diversification, in Agroecology, Gliessmann, S. R., Ed., Springer Verlag, New York, 1990, pp. 11-29.
181. Altieri, M. A., Glaser, D. L., and Schmidt, L. L., Diversification of Agroecosystems for Insect Pest Regulation: Experiments with Collards, in Agroecology, Gliessman, S. R., Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990, 70-82.
182. Pavuk, D. and Stinner, B. R. Influence of weeds in corn plantings on population densities and damage by second-generation Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae, Environ. Entomol., 20, 276, 1991.
183. Nentwig, W., Weedy plant species and their beneficial arthropods: Potential for manipulation in field crops, in: Enhancing Biological Control, Habitat Management to Promote Natural Enemies of Agricultural Pests, Pickett C. H. and Bugg R. L., Eds., University of California Press, Berkeley, 1998, 49-71.
184. Nentwig, W., Frank, T., and Lethmayer, C., Sown weed strips: artificial ecological compensation areas as an important tool in conservation biological control, in Conservation Biological Control, Barbosa, P., Ed., Academic Press, San Diego, 1998, 133-153.
185. Frank, T., Species diversity of ground beetles (Carabidae) in sown weed strips and adjacent fields, in Entomological Research in Organic Agriculture, AB Academic Publishers, Great Britain, 1997, 297-307.
186. Powell, W., Dean, G. J., and Dewar, A., The influence of weeds on polyphagous arthropod predators in winter wheat, Crop Prot., 4, 298, 1985.
187. Honek A., The effects of plant cover and weather on the activity density of ground surface arthropods in a fallow field, Biol. Agric. Hortic., 15, 203, 1997.
188. Vickerman, G. P., Some effects of grass weed control on the arthropod fauna of cereals, in Proc. 12th Br. Weed Control Conf., 3, 929, 1974.
189. Nyffeler, M. and Benz, G., Spiders in natural pest control: a review, J. Appl. Entomol., 103, 321, 1987.
190. Sotherton, N. W., Rands, M. R. W., and Moreby, S. J., Comparison of herbicide treated and untreated headlands for the survival of game and wildlife, in Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds, 991, 1985.
191. House, G. J., No-tillage and legume cover cropping in corn agroecosystems: effects on soil arthropods, Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 24, 99, 1989.
192. Bosch, J., Der Einfluß einiger dominanter Ackerunkräuter auf Nutz-und Schadart-hropoden in Zuckerrüben, Z.Pfl.krankh. Pfl.schutz, 94, 398, 1987.
193. Nilsson, C., Impact of ploughing on emergence of pollen beetle parasitoids after hibernation, Z. angew. Entom. 100, 302, 1985.
194. Bauer, M., Bienenweide in der Feldflur: Maßnahmen zur Trachtverbesserung und Trachtnutzung durch Carnica-Völker, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tübingen, Germany, 1987, pp. 292.
195. Lal, R., No-tillage effects on soil properties and maize (Zea mays L.) production in Western Nigeria, Plant Soil, 40, 321, 1974.
196. Thapa, B. B., Cassel, D. K., and Garrity, D. P., Assessment of tillage erosion rates on steep land Oxisols in the humid tropics using granite rocks, Soil Tillage Res., 51, 233, 1999.
197. Pulcher-Haeussling, M. and Hurle, K., Einfluß der N-Düngung auf die Konkerrenz zwischen Unkräutern und Winterweizen, in Proc. EWRS Symp. Economic Weed Control, 137, 1986.
198. Franz, K., Kaiser, F., and Gerowitt, B., Wirkung unterschiedlich hoher Stickstoffdün- gung auf die Entwicklung und Samenproduktion ausgewählter Unkrautarten, Z. Pflanzenkh. Pflschutz, Sh.XII, 127-135, 1990.
199. Anonymous, SCHALVO: Verordnung des Ministeriums für Umwelt über Schutzbestimmungen in Wasser-und Quellenschutzgebieten und die Gefährdungs-gebieten von Ausgleichsleistungen (Schutzgebiets-und Ausgleichs-Verordnung), Gesetzblatt für Baden-Württemberg vom 30., Dez. 1987, No. 22, 742, 1987.
200. Jordan, V. W. L., Scientic basis for codes of good agricultural practice, in Proc. EC Workshop, Brussels, June 23-24, 1992, 1993, diverse chapters.
201. El Titi, A., Non-inversion tillage in integrated farming concepts: Prospects and constraints of cropping systems in Southwest of Germany, in Proc. Conserv. Agric. A Worldwide Challenge, García-Torres, L., Benites, J., and Martínez-Vilela, A., Eds., 201, 2001.
202. Illnicki, R. D. and Enache, A. J., Subterranean clover living mulch: an alternative method of weed control, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 40, 249, 1992.
203. Ross, S. M. et al., Weed suppression by seven clover species, Agron. J., 93, 620, 2001.
204. Häni, F., Farming systems research at Ipsach, Switzerland-the “Third Wag” project, La Recherche agronomique in Suisse, 29, 257, 1986.
205. Ball, D. A., Weed seedbank response to tillage, herbicides and crop rotation sequence, Weed Sci., 40, 654, 1992.
206. Carter, M. R. and Sanderson J. B., Influence of conservation tillage and rotation length on potato productivity, tuber disease and soil quality parameters on a fine sandy loam in eastern Canada, Soil Tillage Res., 63, 1, 2001.
207. Geier, B. and Vogtmann, H., The multiple row brush hoe-a new tool for mechanical weed-control, in Weed Control in Vegetable Production, Cavalloro, R. and El Titi, A., Eds., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1988, 179-186.
208. Estler, M., Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der mechanischen Unkrautbekämpfung, Z.PflKrankh.Pfl.schutz, Sonderheft XI, 33, 1988.
209. Christian, D. G. and Yates, N. E., The establishment of cover crops by reduced cultivation, direct drilling and pre-harvest sowing and effect on the yield of the following crop, in Experience with the Applicability of No-Tillage Crop Production in the West-European Countries, Tebruegge, F. and Boehrnsen, A., Eds., EU concerted action No AIR3-CT 93-1464, Wissenschaftlicher Fachverlag-Gießen, 1997, 5-15.
210. Wipperfürth, T., Klee als Untersaat im Winterweizen: Eine Methode zur biologischen Kontrolle der Getreideblattläuse, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tübingen, Germany, 1983.
211. Roberts, H. A., Emergence and longevity in cultivated soil of seeds of some annual weeds, Weed Res., 4, 296, 1964.
212. Roberts, H. A. and Dawkins, P. A., Effect of cultivation on the numbers of viable weed seeds in soil, Weed Research, 7, 290, 1967.
213. Roberts, H. A. and Neilson, J. E., Changes in the soil seed bank of four long-term crop/herbicide experiments, J. Appl. Ecol., 18, 661, 1981.
214. Blair, A. M., and Green, M. R., Integrated crop production and crop protection systems. Integrating chemical and mechanical weed control to reduce herbicide use, in Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds, 3, 985, 1993.
215. Rew, L. J., Froud-Williams, R. J., and Boatman, N. D., Dispersal of Bromus sterilis and Anthriscus sylvestris seed within arable field margins, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 59, 107, 1996.
216. Rew, L. and Cussans, G. W., Horizontal movement of seeds following tine and plough cultivations, implications for apatiel dynamics of weed infestations, Weed Res., 37, 247, 1997.
217. Garretta, C. J. et al., Impact of the rhizosphere on soil microarthropods in agroeco-systems on the Georgia piedmont, Appl. Soil Ecol., 16, 141, 2001.