Effect of the pre-emergence bioherbicide Phomopsis convolvulus on seedling and established plant growth of Convolvulus arvensis

Weed Research

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 175-182

  Vogelgsang, S ^a   Watson, A K ^a   Ditommaso, A ^a   Hurle, K ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCONTROL AGENT; BIOPESTICIDE; FUNGAL PATHOGEN;

CONVOLVULUS ARVENSIS; PHOMOPSIS CONVOLVULUS;

EID: 0031827306     PISSN: 00431737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3180.1998.00088.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BELL AA (1980) The time sequence of defense. In: Plant Disease - An Advanced Treatise, Vol. 5. How Plants defend themselves (eds JG Horsfall & EB Cowling), pp. 53-73. Academic Press, New York.
2. BOYETTE CG & WALKER HL (1985) Evaluation of Fusarium lateritium as a biological herbicide for controlling velvet-leaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa). Weed Science 34, 106-9.
3. DEGENNARO FP & WELLER SC (1984) Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) hiotypes to glyphosate. Weed Science 32, 472-6.
4. DERSCHEID LA, STRITZKE JF & WRIGHT WG (1970) Field bindweed control with cultivation, cropping and chemicals. Weed Science 18, 590-6.
5. DUFNER J, JENSEN U & SCHUMACHER E (1992) Statistik mit SAS. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany.
6. FITT BDL, MCCARTNEY HJ & WALKLATE PJ (1989) The role of rain in dispersal of pathogen inoculum. Annual Review of Phytopathology 27, 241-70.
7. HOLM LG, PLUNKNETT DL, PANCHO JV & HERBERGER JP (1977) The World's Worst Weeds. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.
8. HÖPNER H & ALABOUVETTE C (1996) Importance of physical and chemical soil properties in the suppressiveness of soils to plant diseases. European Journal of Soil Biology 32, 41-58.
9. KOSINSKI W & WELLER SC (1989) 5-Enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase activity in field bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L., biotypes. Weed Science Society of America Abstracts 29, 76-7.
10. MADDEN LV (1992) Rainfall and the dispersal of fungal spores. Advances in Plant Pathology 8, 39-79.
11. MARTIN JT (1965) Role of cuticle in the defense against plant disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 2, 81-100.
12. MORIN L, WATSON AK & REELEDER RD (1989a) Effect of dew, inoculum density, and spray additives on infection of field bindweed by Phomopsis convolvulus. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 12, 48-52.
13. MORIN L, WATSON AK & REELEDER RD (1989b) Efficacy of Phomopsis convolvulus for control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Science 37, 830-5.
14. MORIN L, WATSON AK & REELEDER RD (1990) Production of conidia by Phomopsis convolvulus. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 36, 86-91.
15. ORMENO-NUÑEZ J, REELEDER RD & WATSON AK (1988a) A new species of Phomopsis recovered from field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Canadian Journal of Batany 66, 2228-33.
16. ORMENO-NUÑEZ J, REELEDER RD & WATSON AK (1988b) A foliar disease of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) caused by Phomopsis convolvulus. Plant Disease 72, 338-42.
17. PAULITZ TC & BAKER R (1987) Biological control of Pythium damping-off with Pythium nunn: Influence of soil environment and organic amendments. Phytopathology 77, 341-6.
18. PHILLIPS RE, BLEVINS RL, THOMAS GW, FRYE WW & PHILLIPS SH (1980) No-tillage agriculture. Science 208, 1108-13.
19. SPARACE SA, WYMORE LA, MENASSA R & WATSON AK (1991) Effects of the Phomopsis convolvulus conidial matrix on conidia germination and the leaf anthracnose disease of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Plant Disease 75, 1175-9.
20. STEEL RGD & TORRIE HT (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
21. STOTZKY G (1974) Activity, ecology, and population dynamics of microorganisms in soil. In: Microbial Ecology (eds AI Laskin & H LeChevalier), pp. 57-135. CRC Press, Palm Beach, FL.
22. SWAN DG & CHANCELLOR RJ (1976) Regenerative capacity of field bindweed roots. Weed Science 24, 306-8.
23. TUITE J (1969) Plant Pathological Methods: Fungi and Bacteria. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis.
24. VOGELGSANG S, WATSON AK & HURLE K (1994) The efficacy of Phomopsis convolvulus against field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) applied as a pre-emergence bioherbicide. Journal for Plant Diseases and Protection, Special Issue XIV, 253-60.
25. WAKSMAN SA (1952) Soil Microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
26. WALKER HL (1981) Granular formulation of Alternaria macrospora for control of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata). Weed Science 29, 342-5.
27. WALKER HL & CONNICK WJ JR (1983) Sodium alginate for production and formulation of mycoherbicides. Weed Science 31, 333-8.
28. WATSON AK & WYMORE LA (1990) Identifying limiting factors in the biocontrol of weeds. In: New Directions in Biological Control: Alternatives for Suppressing Agricultural Pests and Diseases (eds R Baker & P Dunn). UCLA Symposium of Molecular and Cellular Biology, New Series 112, 305-16.
29. WEAVER SE & RILEY WR (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds. 53. Convolvulus arvensis L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 62, 461-72.
30. WEIDEMANN GJ & TEMPLETON GE (1988) Efficacy and soil persistence of Fusarium solani f. sp. cucurbitae for control of texas gourd (Cucurbita texana). Plant Disease 72, 36-8.
31. WHITWORTH JW & MUZIK TJ (1967) Differential response of selected clones of bindweed to 2,4 D. Weeds 15, 275-80.
32. YERKES CD & WELLER SC (1996) Diluent volume influences susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Technology 10, 565-9.