Integrated versus segregated accounting and the magnitude effect in temporal discounting

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 732-739

  Grace, Randolph C ^a   McLean, Anthony P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31044439759     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196765     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AINSLIE, G. W. (1974). Impulse control in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 485-489.
2. BENZION, U., RAPOPORT, A., & YAGIL, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Science, 35, 270-284.
3. CHAPMAN, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 771-791.
4. CHAPMAN, G. B. (1998). Sooner or later: The psychology of intertemporal choice. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 83-113). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. CHAPMAN, G. B., & WINQUIST, J. R. (1998). The magnitude effect: Temporal discount rates and restaurant tips. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 119-123.
6. GRACE, R. C. (1999). The matching law and amount-dependent exponential discounting as accounts of self-control choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 27-44.
7. GREEN, L., FRISTOE, N., & MYERSON, J. (1994). Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 383-389.
8. GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., HOLT, D. D., SLEVIN, J. R., & ESTLE, S. J. (2004). Discounting of delayed food rewards in pigeons and rats: Is there a magnitude effect? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 39-50.
9. GREEN, L., MYERSON, J., & MCFADDEN, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition, 25, 715-723.
10. KAHNEMAN, D., & TVERSKY, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
11. KIRBY, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 54-70.
12. LOEWENSTEIN, G. (1988). Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science, 34, 200-214.
13. LOEWENSTEIN, G., & PRELEC, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 119-145). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14. MAZUR, J. E. (1984). Tests for an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 426-436.
15. MCLEAN, A. P., & BLAMPIED, N. M. (2001). Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: Independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 25-42.
16. MYERSON, J., & GREEN, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 263-276.
17. ONG, E. L., & WHITE, K. G. (2004). Amount-dependent temporal discounting? Behavioural Processes, 66, 201-212.
18. RODRIGUEZ, M. L., & LOGUE, A. W. (1988). Adjusting delay to reinforcement: Comparing choice in pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 105-117.
19. THALER, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201-207.