Comparison of the effect of non-ionic and ionic contrast agents on pancreatic histology in a canine model

Journal of the Pancreas

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 27-33

  Pfau, Patrick R ^a   Mosley, Robert G ^a   Said, Adnan ^a   Gopal, Deepak V ^a   Fischer, Michael C ^a   Oberley, Terry ^a   Weiss, John ^a   Lee Jr , Fred T ^a   Eckoff, Devon ^a   Reichelderfer, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde; Contrast media; Microscopy, electron; Microscopy, polarization; Pancreatitis

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; HYPAQUES; IOHEXOL; IONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPAMIDOL; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; DUODENUM INTUBATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FLUOROSCOPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HYPERAMYLASEMIA; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; NONHUMAN; OSMOLARITY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PANCREAS INJURY; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATOGRAPHY;

AMYLASES; ANIMALS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE; DOGS; IOHEXOL; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MODELS, ANIMAL; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PANCREAS; PANCREATITIS;

EID: 30844466617     PISSN: 15908577     EISSN: 15908577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mallery JS, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:633-8. [PMID 12709688]
2. Barkin JS, Casal GL, Reiner DK, Goldberg RI, Phillips RS, Kaplan S. A comparative study of contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Am J Gasterenterol 1991; 86:1437-41. [PMID 1928034]
3. Banerjee AK, Grainger SL, Thompson RP. Trial of low versus high osmolar contrast media in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Br J Clin Pract 1990; 44:445-7. [PMID 2282293]
4. O'Connor HJ, Ellis WR, Manning AP, Lintott DJ, McMahon MJ, Axon AT. Iopamidol as contrast agent in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: a prospective randomized comparison with diatrizoate. Endoscopy 1988; 20:244-7. [PMID 3168937]
5. Goebel C, Hardt P, Doppl W, Temme H, Hackstein N, Klor HU. Frequency of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with iopromid or iotrolan: a randomized trial. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:677-80. [PMID 10795554]
6. Johnson GK, Geenen JE, Bedford RA, Johanson J, Cass O, Sherman S, et al. A comparison of nonionic versus ionic contrast media: results of a prospective multicenter study. Midwest Pancreatobiliary study group. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42:312-6. [PMID 8536898]
7. Sherman S, Hawes RH, Rathgaber SW, Uzer MF, Smith MT, Khusro OE, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized, prospective study comparing a low- and high-osmolarity contrast agent. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:422-7. [PMID 7926531]
8. Vinay K, Nelso F, Abul A. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders/Elsevier, 2005. [ISBN 721601871]
9. Almen T, Aspelin P. Cardiovascular effects of ionic monomeric, ionic dimeric and non-ionic contrast media. Effects in animals on myocardial contractile force, pulmonary and aortic blood pressure and aortic endothelium. Invest Radiol 1975; 10:557-63. [PMID 1201937]
10. Bub H, Burner W, Riemann JF, Stolte M. Morphology of the pancreatic ductal epithelium after traumatization of the papilla of Vater or endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with various contrast media in cats. Scand J Gastroenterol 1983; 18:581-92. [PMID 6675180]
11. Ju YM, Kim MH, Lee SK, Seo DW, Min YI, Kim JY. Comparative cytotoxicity of low-osmolar nonionic and high-osmolar ionic contrast media to dog gallbladder epithelial cells. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:382-6. [PMID 11868013]
12. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis : a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:425-34. [PMID 11577302]
13. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:417-23. [PMID 11232684]
14. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F DeBerardinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCO: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10. [PMID 9684657]
15. Saari A, Kivisaari C, Standertskjold-Nordenstam C, Brackett K, Schroder T. Experimental pancreatography: a comparison of three contrast media. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23:53-58. [PMID 3344398]
16. Freeman ML, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59:845-64. [PMID 15173799]