Comparative cytotoxicity of low-osmolar nonionic and high-osmolar ionic contrast media to dog gallbladder epithelial cells

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 382-386

  Ju, Young Min ^a   Kim, Myung Hwan ^a,b   Lee, Sung Koo ^a   Seo, Dong Wan ^a   Min, Young Il ^a   Kim, Ji Yeon ^a  

^a Asan Medical Center ^*

^b Asan Medical Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPROMIDE; MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOHEXOL; MEGLUMINE IOTALAMATE;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL FRACTIONATION; CELL GROWTH; CHOLANGITIS; CHROMOSOME DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSTASIS; CYTOTOXICITY; DOG; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG INHIBITION; DRUG MECHANISM; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EPITHELIUM CELL; GALLBLADDER EPITHELIUM; NONHUMAN; OSMOLARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; EVALUATION; GALLBLADDER; PANCREATITIS;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; CELL CYCLE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLANGITIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOGS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; GALLBLADDER; IOHEXOL; IOTHALAMATE MEGLUMINE; PANCREATITIS;

EID: 0036512917     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.121595     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Morris TW. X-ray contrast media: where are we now, and where are we going. Radiology 1993;188:11-6.
2. ASGE. Radiographic contrast media used in ERCP: technical assessment status evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:647-51.
3. McClennan BL. Low-osmolality contrast media: premises and promises. Radiology 1987;162:1-8.
4. Dawson P. Chemotoxicity of contrast media and clinical adverse effects: a review. Invest Radiol 1985;20:S84-91.
5. Wolf GL. Safer, more expensive iodinated contrast agents: how do we decide? Radiology 1986;159:557-8.
6. Ponchon T. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 2000;32:200-8.
7. Cohen SA, Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:385-94.
8. Hart R, Classen M. Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1990;22:229-33.
9. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, Berardinis FD, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:1-10.
10. Cunliffe WJ, Cobden I, Lavelle MI, Lendrum R, Tait NP, Venables CW. A randomized, prospective study comparing two contrast media in ERCP. Endoscopy 1987;19:201-2.
11. Barkin JS, Casai GL, Reiner DK, Goldberg RI, Phillips RS, Kaplan S. A comparative study of contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol 1991;86:1437-41.
12. Draganov P, Cotton PB. Iodinated contrast sensitivity in ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:1398-401.
13. Bub H, Burner W, Riemann JF, Stolte M. Morphology of the pancreatic uctal epithelium after traumatization of the papilla of Vater or endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with various contrast media in cats. Scand J Gastroenterol 1983;18:581-92.
14. Bedford RA, Johnson GK, Green JE, Lehman G, Frakes J, Ryan M, et al. Does the use of non-ionic contrast prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis: results of a prospective multicenter study [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:AB270.
15. Bedford RA, Johnson GK, Green JE, Lehman G, Frakes J, Ryan M, et al. Ionic versus non-ionic contrast media: does stepwise therapy influence the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1993;104:A294.
16. Johnson GK, Green JE, Bedford RA, Johanson J, Cass O, Sherman S, et al. A comparison of nonionic versus ionic contrast media: results of a prospective, multicenter study Gastointest Endosc 1995;42:312-6.
17. Mergener K, Baillie J. Complications of endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998;30:230-43.
18. Rambow A, Staritz M, Manns M, Hutteroth T, Meyer Zum Busohenfelde KH. ERCP which contrast medium is suitable? Z Gastroenterol 1988;26:279-82.
19. Oda D, Lee SP, Hayashi A. Long-term culture and partial characterization of dog gallbladder epithelial cells. Lab Invest 1991;64:682-92.
20. Nordby A, Halgunset J, Haugen OA. Effects of radiographic contrast media on monolayer cell cultures. Invest Radiol 1986;21:234-9.
21. Nordby A, Halgunset J, Thorstensen K, Haugen OA. Short-term effects of radiographic contrast media on monolayer cell cultures and hepatocytes. Invest Radiol 1987;22:603-7.
22. Potier M, Lagroye I, Lakhdar B, Cambar J, Idee JM. Comparative cytotoxicity of low- and high-osmolar contrast media to human fibroblasts and rat mesangial cells in culture. Invest Radiol 1997;32:621-6.
23. Hardiek K, Katholi RE, Ramkumar V, Deitrick C. Proximal tubule cell response to radiographic contrast media. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2001;280:F61-70.
24. Nordby A, Halgunset J, Haugen OA. Cytostatic effects of radiographic contrast media in synchronized cell cultures. Invest Radiol 1987;22:678-84.
25. Tucker JD, Preston RJ. Chromosome aberrations, micronuclei, aneuploidy, sister chromatid exchanges, and cancer risk assessment. Mutat Res 1996;365:147-59.
26. Cochran ST, Norman A. Cytogenetic effects of contrast material: diatrizoate versus iothalamate. Invest Radiol 1982;17:178-82.
27. Matsubara S, Kong ZS, Omura M, Kurihara H, Torigoe S, Iwasawa T, et al. The effects of iodine-based contrast agents on the levels of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations. Radiat Res 1997;147:263-8.
28. Cochran ST, Norman A. Chromosome damage from nonionic contrast media. Invest Radiol 1994;29:S206-7.
29. Mozdarani H, Fadaei S. Similar cytogenetic effects of sodium-meglumine diatrizoate and sodium-meglumine ioxithalamate in lymphocytes of patients undergoing brain CT scan. Toxicol Lett 1998;98:25-30.
30. Cochran ST, Norman A. Induction of micronuclei in lymphocytes of patients undergoing excretory urography with ioversol. Invest Radiol 1994:29:210-2.
31. Dawson P, Penhaligon M, Smith E, Saunders J. Synergistic cytotoxicity of iodinated contrast agents and x-radiation. Invest Radiol 1988;23:S110-3.
32. Li R, Yerganian G, Duesberg P, Kraemer A, Wilier A, Rausch C, et al. Aneuploidy correlated 100% with chemical transformation of Chinese hamster cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:14506-11.
33. Steinbeck RG. Proliferation and DNA aneuploidy in mild dysplasia imply early steps of cervical carcinogenesis. Acta Oncol 1997;36:3-12.