Wavelet filter analysis of atmospheric pressure effects in the long-period seismic mode band

Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors

Volumn 154, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 70-84

  Hu, X G ^a,b   Liu, L T ^a   Hinderer, J ^c   Hsu, H T ^a   Sun, H P ^a  

^a Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c UMR 7063   (France)

Author keywords

Free oscillations; Pressure correction; Superconducting gravimeter; Wavelet filter

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; BANDPASS FILTERS; GRAVIMETERS; GRAVITATION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

FREE OSCILLATIONS; PRESSURE CORRECTION; SUPERCONDUCTING GRAVIMETER; WAVELET FILTER;

SEISMOLOGY;

SEISMIC WAVE; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

EID: 30744445161     PISSN: 00319201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2005.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. D., Banka, D., Crossley, Noise levels of superconducting gravimeters at seismic frequencies. Geophys. J. Int. 139, 1999. 87-97.
2. R., Beauduin, P., Lognonné, J.P., Montagner, S., Cacho, J.F., Karczewski, M., Morand Atmospheric pressure changes on seismic signals or how to improve the quality of a station. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1996. 1760-1769.
3. R.R., Coifman, M.V., Wickerhauser, Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 38, (2), 1992. 713-718.
4. N., Courtier, B., Ducarme, J., Goodkind, J., Hinderer, Y., Imanishi, N., Seama, H., Sun, J., Merriam, B., Bengert, D., Smylie, Global superconducting gravimeter observations and the search for the translational modes of the inner core. Phys. Earth Planet Int. 117, 2000. 3-20.
5. Crossley, D., Hinderer, J., Casula, G., Francis, O., Hsu, H.-T., Imanishi, Y., Jentzsch, G., Kaarianen, J., Merriam, J., Meurers, B., Neumeyer, J., Richter, B., Shibuya, K., Sato, T., van Dam, T., 1999. Network of superconducting gravimeters benefits a number of disciplines, EOS, 80, 11, 121-126.
6. D., Crossley, O., Jensen, J., Hinderer, Effective barometric admittance and gravity residuals. Phys. Earth Planet Int. 90, 1995. 221-241.
7. D,. Crossley, J., Hinderer, S., Rosat, Using the atmosphere-gravity correlation to derive a time-dependent admittance. Bull. Inf. Mar. Terr. 136, 2002. 10809-10820.
8. I., Daubechies, Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelet. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 1988. 909-996.
9. I., Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets, Number 61 in CBMS-NSF Series in Applied Mathematics. 1992. SIAM, Philadelphia.
10. F.A., Dahlen, R.V., Sailor, Rotational and elliptical splitting of the free oscillations of the Earth. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 58, 1979. 609-623.
11. K., Doi, T., Higashi, I., Nakegawa, An effect of atmospheric changes on the time change of gravity observed by a superconducting gravity meter. J. Geod. Soc. Jpn. 37, 1991. 1-12.
12. M., Freybourger, J., Hinderer, J., Trampert Comparative study of superconducting gravimeters and broadband seismometers STS-1/Z in subseismic frequency bands. Phys. Earth Planet Int. 101, 1997. 203-217.
13. F., Gilbert, A., Dziewonski, An application of normal mode theory to the retrieval of structural parameters and source mechanisms from seismic spectra. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 278, 1975. 187-269.
14. J., Hinderer, D., Crossley, Scientific achievements from the first period (1997-2003) of the Global Geodynamics Project using a worldwide network of superconducting gravimeters. J. Geodyn. 38, 2004. 237-262.
15. X.-G., Hu, L.T., Liu, J., Hinderer, H.P., Sun, Wavelet filter analysis of local atmospheric pressure effects on gravity variations. J. Geod. 2005. 79, doi:10.1007/s00190-005-0486-6
16. Kamal, L., Mansinha, A test of the superconducting gravimeter as a long-period seismometer. Phys. Earth Planet Int. 71, 1992. 52-60.
17. C., Kroner, G., Jentzsch, Comparison of different barometric pressure reductions for gravity data and resulting consequences. Phys. Earth. Planet Int. 115, 1999. 205-218.
18. 2(R). Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 315, 1989. 69-87.
19. S., Mallat, A theory for multiscale signals decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 1989. 674-693.
20. G., Masters, F., Gilbert, Attenuation in the earth at low frequencies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A308, 1983. 479-522.
21. Masters, G., Widmer, R., 1995. Free oscillation: Frequencies, global earth physics, A Handbook of Physical Constants, AGU Reference Shelf Online 1, http://www.agu.org/reference/gephys/9_masters.pdf.
22. J., Merriam, Atmospheric pressure and gravity. Geophys. J. Int. 109, 1992. 488-500.
23. J., Merriam, The nearly diurnal free wobble resonance in gravity measured at Cantley. Qubec Geophys. J. Int. 119, 1994. 369-380.
24. B., Meurers, Gravitational effects of atmospheric processes in SG gravity data. Cahier du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie 17, 1999. 57-65.
25. A., Mukai, T., Higashi, S., Takemoto, I., Nakagawa, I., Naito, Accurate estimation of atmospheric effects on gravity observations made with a superconducting gravity meter at Kyoto. Phys. Earth Planet Int. 91, 1995. 149-159.
26. T., Müller, W., Zürn, Observations of gravity changes during the passage of cold fronts. J. Geophys. 53 (3), 1983. 155-162.
27. J., Neumeyer, Frequency-dependent atmospheric pressure correction on gravity variations by means of cross spectral analysis. Bull. Inf. Mar. Terr. 122, 1995. 9212-9220.
28. J. Neumeyer F. Barthelmes D. Wolf Atmospheric pressure correction for gravity data using different methods B. Ducarme P. Paquet Proc. 13th Int. Symp. Earth Tides July 1997, Brussels 1998 431-438
29. Peterson, J., 1993. Observation and modeling of seismic background noise, U.S. Geol. Surv., Open-File Re 1-45, 93-322.
30. J., Park, T.R., Song, J., Tromp, E., Okal, S., Stein, G., Roult, E., Clevede, G., Laske, H., Kanamori, P., Davis, J., Berger, C., Braitenberg, M., Van Camp, X., Lei, H., Sun, H., Xu, S., Rosat, Earth's free oscillations excited by the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. Science 308, 2005. 1139-1144.
31. B., Richter, Three years of registration with the superconducting gravimeter. Bull. Inf. Mar. Terr. 93, 1983. 1-9.
32. B., Richter, H.G., Wenzel, W., Zürn, F., Klopping, From Chandler wobble to free oscillations: Comparison of cryogenic gravimeters and other instruments in a wide period range. Phys. Earth Planet Int. 91, 1995. 131-148.
33. B., Richter, R., Warburton, A new generation of superconducting gravimeters enables the in-situ detection and elimination of offsets and interruptions from continuous gravity measurements. In: Ducarme, B. (Ed.), Proc. 13th Int. Symp. Earth Tides. Brussels, 1998. 545-555.
34. S., Rosat, J., Hinderer, D., Crossley, A comparison of the seismic noise levels at various GGP stations. Bull. Inf. Mar. Terr. 135, 2002. 10689-10700.
35. S., Rosat, J., Hinderer, L., Rivera, First observation of 2S1 and study of the splitting of the football mode 0S2 after the June 2001 Peru earthquake of magnitude 8.4. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, (21), 2003. 2111. doi:10.1029/2003GL018304
36. S., Rosat, T., Sato, Y., Imanishi, J., Hinderer, Y., Tamura, H., McQueen, M., Qhashi, High-resolution analysis of the gravest seismic normal modes after the 2004 Mw = 9 Sumatra earthquake using superconducting gravimeter data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, 2005. L13304, doi:10.1029/2005GL018304
37. J., Resovsky, M., Ritzwoller, New and refined constraints on three-dimensional Earth structure from normal modes below 3mHz. J. Geophys. Res. 103, (1), 1998. 783-810.
38. L.B., Slichter, The fundamental free mode of the Earth's inner core. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 47, 1961. 186-190.
39. M., Smith, T., Barnwell, Exact reconstruction for tree-structured subband coders. IEEE Trans. ASSP 34, 1986. 431-441.
40. R.S., Spratt, Modeling the effect of atmospheric pressure variations on gravity. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 71, 1982. 173-186.
41. J., Tromp, E., Zanzerkia, Toroidal splitting observations from the great 1994 Bolivia and Kuril Islands earthquakes Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1995. 2297-2300.
42. H., Virtanen, Observation of free oscillation of the earth by superconducting gravimeter GWR T-020 Acta Geod. Geophys. Hung. 31, 1996. 423-431.
43. M. Van Camp Measuring seismic normal modes with the GWR C021 superconducting gravimeter Phys. Earth Planet Int. 116, 1999. 81-92.
44. R.J. Warburton J.M. Goodkind The influence of atmospheric pressure variations on gravity Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 48, 1977. 281-292.
45. R.J. Warburton E.W. Brinton Recent Developments in GWR Instrument's superconducting Gravimeters, in workshop proceedings, Non-tidal gravity changes, Proc. of Second Workshop: Non-tidal gravity changes Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 11, 1995. 23-56.
46. R. Widmer What can superconducting gravimeters contribute to normal mode seismology? Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 2003. 1370-1380.
47. W. Zürn R. Widmer On noise reduction in vertical seismic records below 2 mHz using local barometric pressure. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1995. 3537-3540.
48. W. Zürn G. Laske R. Widmer F. Gilbert Observation of Coriolis coupled modes below 1 mHz. Geophys. J. Int. 143, 2000. 113-118.