Dysfunction and thrombotic complications of vascular access devices

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Volumn 30, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages

  Steiger, Ezra ^a,b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATHETER; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CATHETER THROMBOSIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; HOME CARE; HUMAN; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT INDICATION; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE;

CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; HUMANS; PARENTERAL NUTRITION, HOME; THROMBOSIS;

EID: 30744437149     PISSN: 01486071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/01486071060300S1S70     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Moureau N, Poole S, Murdock MA, Gray SM, Semba CP. Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:1009-1016.
2. Stephens LC, Haire WD, Kotulak GD. Are clinical signs accurate indicators of the cause of central venous catheter occlusion? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1995;19:75-79.
3. Grant J. Recognition, prevention, and treatment of home total parenteral nutrition central venous access complications. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(suppl):S21-S28. This is an excellent descriptive article by an expert clinician on the immediate and long term complications of obtaining central venous access for patients on home parenteral nutrition. There are many chest x-rays that are very helpful in demonstrating some of these complications. LEVEL 6
4. Mirza B, Vanek V, Kupensky D. Pinch-off syndrome: case report and collective review of the literature. Am Surg. 2004;70:635-644.
5. Andris DA, Krzywda EA, Schulte W, Ausman R, Quebbeman EJ. Pinch-off syndrome: a rare etiology for central venous catheter occlusion. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1994;18:531-533. This is a prospective evaluation of over 1400 tunneled Silastic catheters describing the incidence and clinical and radiologic presentation of patients presenting with the catheter "pinch off" complication. LEVEL 3
6. Xiang DZ, Verbeken EK, Van Lommel AT, Stas M, De Wever I. Composition and formation of the sleeve enveloping a central venous catheter. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:260-271.
7. O'Farrell L, Griffith JW, Lang CM. Histologic development of the sheath that forms around long-term implanted central venous catheters. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1996;20:156-158.
8. Merport M, Murphy T, Egglin T, Dubel GJ. Fibrin sheath stripping versus catheter exchange for the treatment of failed tunneled hemodialysis catheters: randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1115-1120.
9. Scolapio JS, Fleming CR, Kelly D, Wick DM, Zinsmeister AR. Survival of home parenteral nutrition-treated patients: 20 years of experience at the Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:217-222.
10. Department of Health and Human Services for Health Care Financing Administration. Program Memorandum Intermediaries/Carriers: Intestinal and Multi-Visceral Transplantation. Baltimore, MD: Department of Health and Human Services for Health Care Financing Administration; 2001. HCFA-Pub. 60AB.
11. Howard L, Ashley C. Management of complications in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1651-1661.
12. Richards DM, Deeks JJ, Sheldon TA, Shaffer JL. Home parenteral nutrition: a systematic review. Health Tech Assess. 1997;1:1-59.
13. Cho JS, Gloviczki P. Venous disease. Surgery. 2001;16:16.1-16.14.
14. Joffe HV, Goldhaber SZ. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Circulation. 2002;106:1874-1880.
15. Monreal M, Raventos A, Lerma R, et al. Pulmonary embolism in patients with upper extremity DVT associated to venous central lines: a prospective study. Thromb Haemost. 1994;72:148-150.
16. Kovacs MJ, Mackinnon KM, Anderson D, et al. A comparison of three rapid D-dimer methods for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Br J Haemotol. 2001;115:140-144.
17. Hartnell GG, Hughes LA, Finn JP, Longmaid HE 3rd. Magnetic resonance angiography of the central chest veins: a new gold standard? Chest. 1995;107:1053-1057.
18. Klerk CPW, Smorenburg SM, Buller HR. Thrombosis prophylaxis in patient populations with a central venous catheter. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1913-1921. This systematic review analyzes the potential benefits of heparin added to PN solutions as well as the benefits of prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with vascular access devices. LEVEL 2
19. Luciani A, Clement O, Halimi P, et al. Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on Doppler US. Radiology. 2001;220:655-660. This paper, with references 20, 21, and 22, makes the point that the safest catheter tip placement is at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. LEVEL 5
20. Petersen J, Delaney J, Brakstad M, et al. Silicone venous access devices positioned with their tips high in the superior vena cava are more likely to malfunction. Am J Surg. 1999;178:38-41. This paper, with references 20, 21, and 22, makes the point that the safest catheter tip placement is at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. LEVEL 5
21. Cadman A, Lawrance JAL, Fitzsimmons L, Spencer-Shaw A, Swindell R. To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:349-355. This paper, with references 20, 21, and 22, makes the point that the safest catheter tip placement is at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. LEVEL 5
22. Labourey JL, Lacroix P, Genet D, et al. Thrombotic complications of implanted central venous access devices: prospective evaluation. Bull Cancer. 2004;91:431-436. This paper, with references 20, 21, and 22, makes the point that the safest catheter tip placement is at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium. LEVEL 5
23. Passaro M, Steiger E, Curtas S, Seidner DL. Long-term Silastic catheters and chest pain. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1994;18:240-242.
24. Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer M. Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access-a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:454-460.