THE SCIENCE OR SCIENCES OF APHASIA?

The Sciences of Aphasia: From Therapy to Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 201-224

  Byng, Sally ^a   Parr, Susie ^b   Cairns, Deborah ^b  

^a Connect the Communication Disability Network ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30644479587     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789004488038_017     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Alderson, P. (2001). On doing qualitative research linked to ethical healthcare. The Wellcome Trust, London.
2. Barbour, R. (1999). The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. J. Health Services Research and Policy, 4, 39-48.
3. Barnes, C., G. Mercer and T. Shakespeare (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Polity Press, Cambridge.
4. Barrow, J. (1988). The world within the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. British Sociological Association (1996) Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Adopted by the Medical Sociology Group of the British Sociological Association
6. Alderson, P. (2001). On doing qualitative research linked to ethical healthcare. The Wellcome Trust, London.
7. Byng, S., C. Pound and S. Parr (2000). Living with aphasia: A framework for interventions. In: Acquired Neurogenic Communication Disorders: A Clinical Perspective (I. Papathanasiou, ed.) pp. 49-75. Whurr Publishers, London.
8. Byng, S., Cairns, D. and J. Duchan (in press). Values in practice and practising values. J. Communication Disorders.
9. Cairns, D. (in press). Controlling language and life: Therapy for communication and identity in a bilingual speaker. In: The Aphasia Therapy File Volume II (S. Byng et al, ed). Psychology Press, Hove
10. Coulter, A. (1997). The pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J. Health Services Policy, 2, 112-121.
11. Damico, J., N. Simmons-Mackie, M. Oelschlaeger, R. Elman and E. Armstrong (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Basic issues. Aphasiology, 13, 651-665.
12. Davies, C. (1999). Reflexive ethnography. Routledge, London.
13. Department of Health (2000). Health in Partnership. Department of Health, London.
14. Elman, R.J. and E.G. Bernstein Ellis (1995). What is functional? Amer. J. Language Pathology, 4,115-117.
15. Frank, A. (1991). At the will of the body: Reflections on illness. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston/New York.
16. Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. In: Research on language and interaction - special issue (S. Jacoby and E. Ochs, eds), 288, 233-260.
17. Greenhalgh, T. (1999). Narrative-based medicine in an evidence based world. British Medical Journal Books, London.
18. Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia. Clinical Forum. Aphasiology, 12,816-830.
19. Kearns, K. (1999). Qualitative research methods in aphasia: A welcome addition. Aphasiology, 13, 649-650.
20. Kennedy, I. (2001). Learning from Bristol: The Department of Health’s Response to the Report of the Public Inquiry into children’s heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. Department of Health, London.
21. Kuhn, D., E. Amsel and M. O’Loughlin (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, Academic Press.
22. Maclean, N., P. Pound, C. Wolfe and A. Rudd (2000). Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation. Br. Med. J., 321, 1051-1054.
23. Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. Sage, London.
24. Mays, N. and C. Pope (1995). Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. Br. Med. J., 311,42-5.
25. McNeil, M. R. and S.R. Pratt (2001). Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical Implications of operating from a formal definition. Aphasiology, 15(10), 901-911.
26. Nettleton, S. (1995). Ihe sociology of health and illness. Polity Press, Cambridge.
27. Parr, S., S. Byng and S. Gilpin (1997). Talking about aphasia: Living with loss of language after stroke. Open University Press, Buckingham.
28. Parr, S. (2001). Psychosocial aspects of aphasia: Whose perspectives? Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedia. Main reports of the 25th World Congress of the International Association of Logopaedics and Phoniatrics, Montreal, September-October, 266-289.
29. Pound, C., S. Parr, J. Lindsay and C. Woolf (2000). Beyond aphasia: Therapies for living with communication disability. Winslow Press, Bicester.
30. Riessman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis. Sage, London.
31. Ritchie, J. and L. Spencer (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Analysing qualitative data. (A. Bryman and R. Burgess, eds.) Routledge, London.
32. Samo, M. (1993). Aphasia rehabilitation: Psychosocial and ethical considerations. Aphasiology, 7, 321-334.
33. Simmons Mackie, N. and J. Damico (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Ethnography. Aphasiology, 13, 681-689.
34. Simmons Mackie, N. and J. Damico (1998). Social role negotiation in aphasia therapy: Competence, incompetence and conflict. In: The social construction of language incompetence (D. Kovarsky, J. Duchan and M. Maxwell, eds). Erlbaum Press, Hillsdsale.
35. Warburton, N. (1992). Philosophy: The basics. Routledge, London.
36. Whitehead, A. (1925). Science and the modem world Free Press, New York.
37. Williams, L., M. Weinberger, L. Harris, D. Clark and J. Biller (1999). Development of a stroke specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 1362-1367.
38. Wolpert, L. (1992). The unnatural nature of science. Faber, London.
39. Worrall, L. and C. Frattali (2000). Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach. Thieme, New York.