The utility of the functional independence measure (FIM) in discharge planning for burn patients

Burns

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 20-23

  Choo, Benji ^a   Umraw, Nisha ^a   Gomez, Manuel ^a   Cartotto, Robert ^a   Fish, Joel S ^a  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Burns; Discharge planning; FIM; Functional independence measure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BURN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NURSING HOME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REHABILITATION CENTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BURN UNITS; BURNS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DISCHARGE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 30544440200     PISSN: 03054179     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.033     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. C.V. Granger, and B.B. Hamilton The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1990 Am J Phys Med Rehabil 71 1992 108 113
2. A.W. Heinemann, P. Kirk, and B.A. Hastie Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78 1997 143 149
3. W.J. Oczkowski, and S. Barreca The functional independence measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 1993 1291 1294
4. N. Pollack, W. Rheault, and J.L. Stoecker Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 1056 1061
5. M.E. Segal, M. Gillard, and R.R. Schall Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure Am J Phys Med Rehabil 75 1996 208 212
6. J.A. Whitlock, and B.B. Hamilton Functional outcome after rehabilitation for severe traumatic brain injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76 1995 1103 1112
7. A.W. Heinemann, J.M. Linacre, B.D. Wright, B.B. Hamilton, and C.V. Granger Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 1993 133 143
8. P.J. Mokler, R. Sandstrom, M. Griffin, L. Farris, and C. Jones Predicting discharge destination for patients with severe motor stroke: important functional tasks Neurorehabil Neural Repair 14 2000 181 185
9. M.A. D'Aquila, T. Smith, D. Organ, S. Lichtman, and M. Reding Validation of a lateropulsion scale for patients recovering from stroke Clin Rehabil 18 2004 102 109
10. H. Ring, L. Bar, and S. Abboud Functional correlates with left-right asymmetry of visual evoked potentials in stroke patients: modeling and experimental results Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 1999 166 172
11. L.A. Saboe, J.M. Darrah, K.S. Pain, and J. Guthrie Early predictors of functional independence 2 years after spinal cord injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78 1997 644 650
12. J.M. Mylotte, R. Graham, L. Kahler, L. Young, and S. Goodnough Impact of nosocomial infection on length of stay and functional improvement among patients admitted to an acute rehabilitation unit Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22 2001 83 87
13. D.Y. Nakamura, P.C. Esselman, R. Mann, and L.H. Engrav The inadequacy of the FIM (functional independence measure) for burns J Burn Care Rehabil 18 1997 S140
14. P.C. Esselman, L.H. Engrav, J.T. Ptacek, K. Kowalske, and B. Krabak Outcome of burn injuries in older adults J Burn Care Rehabil 21 2000 S192
15. B.A. Costa, L.H. Engrav, and R. Holavanahalli Impairment after burns: a two-center, prospective report Burns 29 2003 671 675
16. Appendix B to hospital resources document. Guidelines for service standards and severity classifications in the treatment of burn injury. American Burn Association. Bull Am Coll Surg 1984;69:24-8.
17. K. Kowalske, R. Holavanahalli, P.C. Esselman, and K.L. Ksiazek Functional improvements post burn including its relationship to burn characteristics J Burn Care Rehabil 19 1998 S150
18. P. Smith, B.B. Hamilton, and C.V. Granger Functional independence measure decision tree: the FONE FIM 1989 Research Foundation of the State University of New York Buffalo, NY
19. S.L. Garber, R. Bunzel, and T.N. Monga Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident JRRD 39 2002 521 534
20. P.M. Smith, S.B. Illig, R.C. Fiedler, B.B. Hamilton, and K.J. Ottenbacker Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the functional independence measure in patients with stroke Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 431 435
21. A.I. Greenspan, J.M. Wrigley, M. Kresnow, C.M. Branche-Dorsey, and P.R. Fine Factors influencing failure to return to work due to traumatic brain injury Brain Inj 10 1996 207 218
22. R.J. Petrella, T. Overend, and B. Chesworth FIM after hip fracture: is telephone administration valid and sensitive to change? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81 2002 639 644
23. W.C. Chang, S. Slaughter, and D. Cartwright Evaluating the FONE FIM. Part 1. Construct validity J Outcome Meas 1 1997 192 218
24. W.C. Chang, and D. Chan Evaluating FONE FIM. Part 2. Concurrent validity and influencing factors J Outcome Meas 1 1997 259 285
25. N. Grey, and P. Kennedy The functional independence measure: a comparative study of clinician and self ratings Paraplegia 31 1993 457 461
26. K.J. Ottenbacker, Y. Hsu, C.V. Granger, and R.C. Fiedler The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1996 1226 1232
27. B.B. Hamilton, J.A. Laughlin, R.C. Fiedler, and C.V. Granger Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM) Scand J Rehab Med 26 1994 115 119
28. H. Hetherington, R.J. Earlam, and C.J.C. Kirk The disability status of injured patients measured by the functional independence measure (FIM) and their use of rehabilitation services Injury 26 1995 97 101