Predictions by the odor from feedlots, setback estimation tool (OFFSET) compared with observations by neighborhood monitors

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 55, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1306-1314

  Nimmermark, Sven A ^a   Gay, Susan W ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FARMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ODOR CONTROL; VELOCITY MEASUREMENT; WIND;

ANNOYANCE-FREE FREQUENCIES; ODOR EMISSION RATES; TOPOGRAPHIC VARIATIONS; WIND SPEED;

ODORIZATION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EVALUATION; ODOR; ODOR FROM FEEDLOTS SETBACK ESTIMATION TOOL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOPOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES; WIND;

ANIMALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ODOR CONTROL; VELOCITY; WIND;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 30544435308     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: 21622906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2005.10464730     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Wing, S., Wolf, S. Intensive Livestock Operations, Health, and Quality of Life Among Eastern North Carolina Residents; Environ. Health Per-spect. 2000, 108, 233-238.
2. Thu, K., Donham, K., Ziegenhorn, R., Reynolds, S., Thorne, P.S., Sub-ramanian, P., Whitten, P., Stookesberry, J.A;. Control Study of the Physical and Mental Health of Residents Living Near a Large-Scale Swine Operation; J. Agric. Saf. Health 1997, 3, 13-26.
3. Sidhu, K.S., Warner, P.O., Chadzynski, L. Odor Control at a Large-Scale Swine Production Facility. In Proceedings of theInternational Symposium Ammonia and Odour Control from Animal Production Facilities, Vinkeloord, The Netherlands, October 6-10, 1997; CIGR and Eur-AgEng Publ.: Rosmalen, The Netherlands, 1997; Vol. 2, pp 561-565.
4. Schiffman, S.S., Sattely-Miller, E.A., Suggs, M.S., Graham, B.G. The Effect of Environmental Odors Emanating From Commercial Swine Operations on the Mood ofNearby Residents; Brain Res. Bull. 1995,37, 369-375.
5. Melvin, S.W. Manure Odors-An International Problem. In Proceedings of the 1995 Livestock Waste Management Conference, Champaign, Ur-bana, Il., March 20, 1995; pp 47-50.
6. Ormerod, R. Improving Odour Assessment by Using Better Dispersion Models: Some Examples; Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 44, 149-156.
7. Sheridan, B.A., Hayes, E.T., Curran, T.P., Dodd, V.A.A. Dispersion Modelling Approach to Determining the Odour Impact of Intensive Pig Production Units in Ireland; Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 91, 145-152.
8. Mussio, P., Gnyp, A.W., Henshaw, P.F.A. Fluctuating Plume Dispersion Model for the Prediction of Odour-Impact Frequencies From Continuous Stationary Sources; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 2955-2962.
9. Curran, T.P., Sheridan, B.A., Hayes, E.T., Dodd, V.A. Comparison of Two Dispersion Models for Odour Nuisance Prediction from Pig Units. ASAE/CIGR Annual International Meeting, Chicago, IL, July 28 -31, 2002; paper 02 4014.
10. Zhu, J., Jacobson, L.D., Schmidt, D.R., Nicolai, R. Evaluation of INPUFF-2 Model for Predicting Downwind Odors from Animal Production Facilities; Appl. Eng. Agric. 2000, 16, 159-164.
11. Smith, R.J. Dispersion of Odours from Ground Level Agricultural Sources; J. Agr. Eng. Res. 1993, 54, 187-200.
12. Schulze Lammers, P., Wallenfang, O., Boeker, P., Diekmann, B. Odor Propagation of Agricultural Sources via Finite-Volume-Modeling. In Proceedings of the XIV Memorial CIGR World Congress, International Commission of Agricultural Engineering, Tsukuba, Japan, November 28-December 1, 2000.
13. Schauberger, G., Piringer, M., Petz, E. Calculating Direction-Dependent Separation Distance by a Dispersion Model to Avoid Livestock Odour Annoyance; Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 82, 25-37.
14. Schauberger, G., Piringer, M., Petz, E. Separation Distance to Avoid Odour Nuisance Due to Livestock Calculated by the Austrian Odour Dispersion Model (AODM); Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 87, 13-28.
15. Schauberger, G., Piringer, M., Petz, E. Steady-State Balance Model to Calculate the Indoor Climate of Livestock Buildings Demonstrated for Finishing Pigs; Int. J. Biometeorol. 2000, 43, 154-162.
16. Jacobson, L., Schmidt, D., Wood, S. OFFSET. Odor from Feedlots Setback Estimation Tool; FO-07680-C; University of Minnesota Extension Service: St. Paul, MN, 2001.
17. Jacobson, L.D., Guo, H., Schmidt, D.R., Nicolai, R.E., Zhu, J., Janni, K.A. Development of an Odor Rating System to Estimate Setback Distances from Animal Feedlots: Odor from Feedlots-Setback Estimation Tool (OFFSET). In Proceedings of the ASAE Annual International Meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Milwaukee, WI, July 9-12, 2000; Paper No. 00-4044.
18. Gay, S.W., Schmidt, D.R., Clanton, C.J., Janni, K.A., Jacobson, L.D., Weisberg, S. Odor, Total Reduced Sulfur, and Ammonia Emissions From Animal Housing Facilities and Manure Storage Units in Minnesota; Appl. Eng. Agric. 2003, 19, 347-360.
19. Schmidt, D.R., Bicudo, J. R., Janni, K. Determining Odor Emissions from Manure Surfaces Using a Wind Tunnel. ASAE Annual International Meeting, Toronto, Canada, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI, July 18-22, 1999; Paper No. 99-4033.
20. Jiang, J., Kaye, R. Sampling Techniques for Odour Measurements. In Odours in Wastewater Treatment: Measurement, Modelling and Control; Stuetz, R., Frechen, F.B. Eds., IWA Publishing: London, 2001; pp 95119.
21. Jiang, K.Y., Bliss, P.J., Schutz, T.J. The Development of a Sampling System for Determining Odor Emission Rates From Areal Surfaces: 1. Aerodynamic Performance; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1995, 45, 917-922.
22. E679-91: Standard Practice for Determination of Odor and Taste Thresholds by Forced-Choice Ascending Concentration Series Method of Limits. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards; American Society of Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 1997, pp 1-5.
23. Air Quality—Determination ofOdour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry; CEN/TC264/WG2/N222/e; Comite Europeen de Normalisation: Brussels, Belgium, 1997.
24. Air Quality—Determination ofOdour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry; CEN/EN 13725; Comite Europeen de Normalisation, European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
25. Phillips, V.R., Holden, M.R., Sneath, R.W., Short, J.L., Whate, R.P., Hartung, J., Seedorf, J., Schroder, M., Linkert, K.H., Pedersen, S., Takai, H., Johnsen, J.O., Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G., Uenk, G.H., Scholtens, R., Metz, J.H.M., Wathes, C.M. The Development of Robust Methods of Measuring Concentrations and Emission Rates of Gaseous and Particulate Air Pollutants in Livestock Buildings; J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1998, 70, 11-24.
26. Albright, L.D. Environment Control for Animals and Plants; American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, 1990.
27. E544-75: Standard Practices for Referencing Suprathreshold Odor Intensity. In Annual Book ofASTMStandards; American Society of Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, 1999.
28. Meteorological Monitoring Guidance for Regulatory Modeling Applications; EPA-454/R-99-005; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, 2000.
29. Hartung, E., Jungbluth, T. Determination of the Odor Plume Boundaries from Animal Houses. In Proceedings of the 5th International Livestock Environment Symposium, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Minneapolis, MN, May 29-31, 1997.
30. Nimmermark, S. 2004. Measurements of Hedonic Tone of Odour from Animal Production Facilities. In VDI-Report 1850; VDI Verlag GmbH: Dusseldorf, Germany, 2004; pp 209-218.