Rail passenger perceptions of risk and safety and priorities for improvement

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-75

  Thomas, Lauren J ^a   Rhind, Daniel J A ^a   Robinson, Katie J ^b  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Rail Safety and Standards Board   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Rail passenger; Risk perception; Safety preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 30544432485     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-005-0021-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abley J (2000) Stated preference techniques and consumer decision making: new challenges to old assumptions. Cranfield School of Management Working Paper 2/00, Cranfield University, Cranfield
2. Bray J (2001) Destination passenger: towards a door-to-door railway. Transport 2000 Trust, Platform
3. Bickley S, Seaton A (2002) Research into escape from railway carriages. Interfleet Technology Report for Railway Safety, London
4. Cullen, The Rt Hon Lord (2001) The Ladbroke Grove Rail Inquiry Part I. HSE Books. HMSO, London
5. de Blaeij AT, van Vuuren DJ (2003) Risk perception of traffic participants. Accid Anal Prev 35:167-175
6. DETR (1998) Secure stations scheme - guidelines for operators. HMSO, London
7. Dunbar IH (2002) Train evacuation risk model: stay or go? Risk Solutions Report for Railway Safety
8. Fennell PJ, Muir HC (1992) Passenger attitudes towards airline safety information and comprehension of safety briefings and cards. CAA Paper 92015, Civil Aviation Authority, London
9. Gamble W (2002a) Final summary report: research into emergency hammers. Interfleet Technology Report for Railway Safety, London
10. Gamble W (2002b) Full report: research into emergency door release. Interfleet Technology Report for Railway Safety, London
11. Guppy A (1984) Perceived and real likelihood of the detection of drinking and driving. PhD thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield
12. Hair JE, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
13. Higgs G (2002) Snapwands: final report. Interfleet Technology Ltd commissioned by Railway Safety, London
14. Koushki PA, Al-Saleh OI, Al-Lumaia M (2003) On management's awareness of transit passenger needs. Transport Policy 10:17-26
15. Nelson A (2002) Annual Safety Performance Report 2001/2. Railway Safety, London
16. Railway Safety (2001) Profile of safety risk on railtrack controlled infrastructure: risk profile bulletin, issue 2, July 2001. Railway Safety, London
17. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280-285
18. Thomas LJ (2001) Is it better to be safe and sorry? Hum Factors Aerospace Saf 1(1):99-101
19. Wilson A, Gutmann J (1998) Public transport: the role of mystery shopping in investment decisions. J Market Res Soc 40(4):285-293