A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 739-745

  Noval, S ^a   Contreras, I ^a   Rebolleda, G ^a   Muñoz Negrete, Francisco J ^a,b   Ruiz De Zarate B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL RAMÓN Y CAJAL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chiasmal pathology; Frequency doubling technology perimetry; Neuro ophthalmologic visual field defects; Temporal hemianopia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING PERIMETRY; HEMIANOPIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OPTIC CHIASM; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 30444460767     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210501500613     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucoma visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 413-25.
2. Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone R Calabria G, Zingirian M, Traverso CE. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 35-9.
3. Fong KCS, Byles DB, Constable PH. Does frequency douling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects? Eye 2003; 17: 330-3.
4. Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A, Aspinal P, Taguri A, King AJW. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 327-32.
5. Iwasaki A, Sugita M. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 529-37.
6. Cerio-Ramsden CD, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Moro JGM, Rebolleda G. Perimetría de duplicación de frecuencias en lesiones retroquiasmáticas. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2003; 78: 143-50.
7. Joson PJ, Kamantigue MEG, Chen PR Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 757-60.
8. Iester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C. Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with Octopus perimeter indices. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 288-94.
9. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MFT, Seya R, Maeda H, Negi A. Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 513-20.
10. Thomas D, Thomas R, Prakash Muliyil J, George R. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131: 734-41.
11. Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G. Perimetría automática y neuro-oftalmología. Correlación topográfica. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2003; 77: 413-28.
12. Foroozan R. Chiasmal syndromes. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003; 14: 325-31.
13. Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1277-83.
14. Woodward K, Brito CF, Wall M. Variability of FDT perimetry: effect of a 3 degree offset along the vertical in patients with hemianopias and normals. Visual function, psychophysics and electrophysiology in glaucoma I. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 802.
15. Wall M, Newman S, Johnson C, Fingeret M, Maxner C, Woodward K. Improvement of sensitivity of FDT perimetry to detect hemianopias with a 3 degree stimulus offset along from the vertical. Visual function, psychophysics and electrophysiology in glaucoma I. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 820.
16. Matsuo H, Tomita G, Suzuki Y, Araie M. Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002; 11: 467-73.
17. Carolan JA, Huang CQ, Redline DE, et al. Frequency doubling perimetry for optic nerve and chiasmal neuro-ophthalmic disorders. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1951.
18. Taravati P, Woodward K, Carolan JA, et al. Frequency doubling technology perimetry 2 (24-2) in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopias. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1956.