Effect of porosity and environment on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cement modified with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene particles: I. Fracture toughness

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 121-127

  Vila, M M ^a   Ginebra, M P ^a   Gil, F J ^a   Planell, J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acrylic bone cement; Environmental conditions; Fracture toughness; Modification with elastomeric particles; Porosity

Indexed keywords

ABS RESINS; ACRYLICS; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CRACK PROPAGATION; DUCTILITY; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; POROSITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; VOLUME FRACTION;

ACRYLONITRILE-BUTADIENE-STYRENE PARTICLES; ELASTOMERIC PARTICLES; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS;

BONE CEMENT;

1,3 BUTADIENE; ACRYLIC CEMENT; ACRYLONITRILE; COPOLYMER; ELASTOMER; STYRENE;

ARTICLE; BONE MATRIX; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; MECHANICS; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RIGIDITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BONE CEMENTS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BUTADIENES; ENVIRONMENT; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; POLYSTYRENES; POROSITY;

EID: 0032947397     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:2<121::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Topoleski LD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:135-159.
2. Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan RD, Ilstrup DM. Total hip arthroplasties: a study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg 1974;56A:273-284.
3. James ETR, Hunter GA, Cameron HU. Total hip revision arthroplasty: does sepsis influence the results. Clin Orthop 1982; 170:88-94.
4. Pellici PM, Wilson PD Jr., Sledge CB, Salvati EA, Ramawat CS, Poss P. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1982; 170:34-41.
5. Dorr LD, Takei GK, Conaty JP. Total hip arthroplasties in patient less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65A:474-479.
6. White SH. The fate of cemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients. Clin Orthop 1988;231:29-34.
7. Taitsman JP, Saha S. Tensile strength of wire-reinforced bone cement and twisted stainless steel wire. J Bone Joint Surg 1977;59A:419-425.
8. Rijke AM, Rieger MR, McLaughlin RE, McCoy S. Porous acrylic cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1977;11:373.
9. Guida G, Riccio V, Gatto S, et al. A glass bead composite acrylic bone cement. Ducheyne P, Van der Perre G, Aubert AE, editors. Biomaterials and Biomechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1984. p 19.
10. Henning W, Blencke BA, Brömer H, Deutscher KK, Gross A, Ege W. Investigations with bioactivated polymethylmethacrylates. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;13:89.
11. Castaldini A, Cavallini A. In: Biological and biomedical performance of biomaterials. Christel P, Meunier A, Lee AJC, editors. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1986. p 525-530.
12. Fishbane BM, Pond RB. Stainless steel fiber reinforcement of polymethylmethacrylate. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1977;128:194.
13. Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. The fracture toughness of titanium-fiber reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:1599-1617.
14. Wright TM, Trent PS. Mechanical properties of Aramid fiber reinforced acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci 1979;14:503.
15. Pourdeyhimi B, Robinson HH, Scwartz P, Wagner HD. Fracture toughness of Kevlar 29/poly(methylmethacrylate) composite materials for surgical implantation. Ann Biomed Eng 1986; 14:277-294.
16. Pourdeyhimi B, Wagner HD. Elastic and ultimate properties of acrylic bone cement reinforced with ultra-high-molecular weight polyethylene fibers. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:63-80.
17. Yang J-M, Huang P-Y, Yang M-C, Lo, SK. Effect of MMA-g-UHMWPE grafted fiber on mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 1997;38: 361-369.
18. Pilliar RM, Blackwell R, MacNab I, Cameron HV. Carbon fiber-reinforced bone cement in orthopaedic surgery. J Biomed Mater Res 1976;10:893.
19. Robinson RP, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1981;15:203.
20. Lewis G. The fracture toughness of biomaterials: I. Acrylic bone cements. J Mater Ed 1989;11:429.
21. Planell JA, Vila MM, Driessens FCM, Gil FJ. Acrylic bone cements. Wise DL, Trantolo DJ, Altobelli DI, Yaszenski MJ, Gresser JD, Schwartz ER. editors. Encyclopaedic Handbook of Biomaterials and Bioengineering. Part B. Applications. New York: Marcel Decker. 1995. p 879-921.
22. -1. Colloid Polym Sci 1986;246:473.
23. Shah N. Effect of modifier concentration on the fracture behaviour of rubber-modified PMMA. J Mater Sci 1988;23:3623.
24. Murakami A, Behiri JC, Bonfield W. Rubber modified bone cement. J Mater Sci 1988;23:2029.
25. c for plastics. EGF Newslett 8; 1988/89.
26. Storer RA et al., Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. Storer et el., editors. ASTM E399-83. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1983. p 680-715.
27. Raya A. Biocompatibilidad de un nuevo cemento ósea. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Ph.D. Thesis; 1993.
28. Vila MM. Caracterizacion de la fijacion protesis-hueso en implantes articulares cementados. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona; Ph.D. Thesis; 1992.
29. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ. Fracture Behaviour of Polymers. London: Applied Science Publishers; 1983. p 255.
30. Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. The microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials 1993;14:1165-1172.
31. Bucknall, CB Fracture and failure of multiphase polymers and polymer composites. Adv Polym Sci 1978;27:129-148.
32. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ. Fracture Behaviour of Polymers. London: Applied Science Publishers. 1983. p 371.
33. Rimnac C, Wright T, McGill D. The effect of centrifugation on the fracture properties of acrylic bone cements. J Bone Joint Surg 1986;68A:281.
34. Wang CT, Pilliar RM. Fracture toughness of acrylic bone cements. J Mater Sci 1989;24:3725.
35. Vila MM, Ginebra MP, Gil FJ, Planell JA. Effect of the porosity and the environment on the mechanical behaviour of an acrylic bone cement modified with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene particles: Part II. Fatigue crack propagation. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 1999;48:128-134.
36. Freitag TA, Cannon SL. Fracture characteristics of acrylic bone cements. II. Fatigue. J Biomed Mater Res 1977;11:609-624.