Nonprofit federalism and the CSBG program: Serving the needs of the working poor in the post-TANF era

Administration and Society

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 695-718

  Bishop, Sheilah Watson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Devolution; Nonprofit; Social services; Welfare reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444435949     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399705283091     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Alexander, J., Nank, R., & Stivers, C. (2001). Implications of welfare reform: Do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society? In J. Steven Ott (Ed.), Understanding nonprofit organizations: Governance, leadership, and management (pp. 276-282). Boulder, CO: Westview.
2. Bishop, S. W. (in press). Building a profile of Missouri CSBG community action agencies: Capacities, coping strategies, and the new public management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership.
3. Cole, R. L., Hissong, R. V., & Arvidson, E. (1999). Devolution: Where's the revolution? Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 29, 99-112.
4. DiPadova, L. N. (2000). Utah's charitable organizations face welfare reform: Concerns of charitable leaders. Salt Lake City, UT: Center for Public Policy and Administration.
5. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage.
6. Gault, B., Hartmann, H., & Yi, H.-Y. (1998). Prospects for low-income mothers' economic survival under welfare reform. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 28, 175-193.
7. Givel, M. (1991). The war on poverty revisited: The Community Services Block Grant program in the Reagan Years. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
8. Hall, P. D. (2001). Inventing the nonprofit sector: 1950-1990. In J. S. Ott (Ed.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 112-125). Boulder, CO: Westview.
9. Kramer, R. (1987). Voluntary agencies and the personal social services. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 240-257). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. McMurtry, S. L., Netting, F. E., & Kettner, P. M. (1991). How nonprofits adapt to a stringent environment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1, 235-252.
11. Milward, H. B. (1996). Symposium on the hollow state: Capacity, control, and performance in interorganizational settings: Introduction. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 193-195.
12. Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (1998). Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 203-221.
13. Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-379.
14. Missouri Department of Social Services, Community Services Block Grant Program, (n.d.). CSBG eligible entities annual client characteristics report, 1997 to 2002. Jefferson City, MO: Author.
15. Nathan, R. P., & Gais, T. L. (1998). Early findings about the newest new federalism for welfare. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 28, 95-103.
16. National Association for State Community Services Programs. (1998). Community services network: The Community Services Block Grant in action. Washington, DC: Author.
17. O'Connell, B. (1996). A major transfer of government responsibility to voluntary organizations? Proceed with caution. Public Administration Review, 56, 222-225.
18. Office of Management and Budget. (2002). United States government, fiscal year 2003, health and human services. Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http:/www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2003/bud15.html
19. Reisch, M., & Sommerfeld, D. (2002). Race, welfare reform, and nonprofit organizations. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 29, 155-177.
20. Salamon, L. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Steinberg, R. (1996). Can individual donations replace cutbacks in federal social-welfare spending? In D. F. Burlingame, W. A. Diaz, W. F. Ilchman, & Associates (Eds.), Capacity for change ? The nonprofit world in the age of devolution (pp. 57-80). Indianapolis: Indiana Center on Philanthropy.