Homotopy and heterotopy and the bilateral field advantage in the Dimond paradigm

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 125-136

  Desjardins, Samuel ^a   Braun, Claude M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bilateral field advantage; Dimond paradigm; Heterotopy; Homotopy; Simple reaction time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 30444432545     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. M.T. Banich A. Belger Interhemispheric interaction: How do the hemispheres divide and conquer a dask? Cortex 26 1990 77-94
2. M.T. Banich D.L. Karol The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: evidence from bihemispheric processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 1992 1-65
3. A. Belger M.T. Banich Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity Neuropsychologia 30 1992 923-930
4. J.M. Berger E. Perret A. Zimmermann Role of the interstimulus and stimulus-hemisphere compatibility in the process of interhemispheric integration Perceptual and Motor Skills 67 1988 503-512
5. C.M.J. Braun I. Collin C. Mailloux The "Poffenberger" and "Dimond" paradigms: Interrelated approaches to the study of interhemispheric dynamics? Brain and Cognition 34 1997 337-359
6. C.M.J. Braun S. Daignault S. Miljours & A. Dufresne Does hemispheric relay depend on attention? American Journal of Psychology 108 1995 527-546
7. W.S. Brown & M.A. Jeeves Bilateral visual field processing and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time Neuropsychologia 31 1993 1267-1281
8. W.S. Brown M.A. Jeeves R. Dietrich & D.S. Burnison Bilateral field advantage and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission in commissurotomy and callosal agenesis Neuropsychologia 37 1999 1154-1180
9. R.H.S. Carpenter & M.L.L. Williams Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements Nature 377 1995 59-62
10. D.B. Chklovskii & A.A. Koulakov Maps in the brain: What can we learn from them? Annual Review of Neuroscience 27 2004 369-392
11. S.J. Dimond Hemisphere function and immediate memory Psychonomic Science 16 2 1969 111-112
12. S.J. Dimond & G. Beaumont Processing in perceptual integration between and within the cerebral hemispheres British Journal of Psychology 63 1972 509-514
13. M.C. Dorris & D.P. Munoz Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation Journal of Neuroscience 18 1998 7015-7026
14. B. Farell Same-different judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons Psychological Bulletin 98 1985 419-456
15. T. Hatta & S. Tuji Interhemispheric integration of number stimuli: comparison of arabic with kanji numerals Cortex 29 1993 359-364
16. L. Heimer F.F. Ebner & W.J.H. Nauta A note on the termination of commissural fibers in the neocortex Brain Research 5 1967 171-177
17. B. Hellmann O. Gunturkun & M. Manns Tectal mosaic: Organization of the descending tectal projections in comparison to the ascending tectofugal pathway in the pigeon Journal of Comparative Neurology 472 2004 395-410
18. G.M. Innocenti & R. Bressoud Callosal axons and their development in; E. Zaidel & M. Iacoboni (eds) The parallel brain 2000 MIT Press London 11-26
19. M.A. Jeeves & A. Lamb Cerebral asymmetries and interhemispheric processes Behavior Brain Research 29 1988 211-223
20. M. Livingstone & D. Hubel Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth; anatomy, physiology and perception Science 240 1988 740-749
21. T.E. Ludwig M.A. Jeeves W.D. Norman & R. DeWitt The bilateral field advantage on a letter-matching task Cortex 29 1993 691-713
22. P.R. Manger D. Kiper I. Masiello L. Murillo L. Tettoni Z. Hunyadi et al. The representation of the visual field in three extrastriate areas of the ferret (Mustela putorius) and the relationship of retinotopy and field boundaries to callosal connectivity Cerebral Cortex 12 2002 423-437
23. J.L. Merola & J. Liederman The effects of task difficulty upon the extend to which performance benefits from between-hemisphere division of inputs International Journal of Neuroscience 51 1990 35-44
24. M.W. Miller & B.A. Vogt Heterotopic and homotopic callosal connections in rat visual cortex Brain Research 9 1984 75-89
25. W.D. Norman M.A. Jeeves A. Milne & T. Ludwig Hemispheric interactions: The bilateral advantage and task difficulty Cortex 28 1992 623-642
26. M. Paré & D.P. Munoz Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence Journal of Neurophysiology 76 1996 3666-3681
27. A.T. Poffenberger Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nerve centers Archives of Psychology 23 1912 1-73
28. A.C. Rosenquist Connections of visual cortical areas in the cat in: A. Peters & D.G. Jones (Eds) Cerebral cortex 1985 Plenum Press New York 81-117
29. J. Schmitz-Gielsdorf K. Willes C. Vondenhoff & W. Hartje Effects of spatial arrangement of letter pairs in a name-matching task with unilateral and bilateral hemifield stimulation Neuropsychologia 26 1987 591-602
30. A.B. Sereno & S.M. Kosslyn Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention Neuropsychologia 29 1991 659-675
31. S.P. Springer & G. Deutsch Left brain, right brain Rev. ed. 1985 W.H. Freeman New York
32. N.A. Taroyan V.V. Myamlin & O.A. Genkina Human interhemispheric functional relations during visuospatial problem solving Fiziologiya Cheloveka 29 1992 5-14
33. K.G. Thompson & N.P. Bichot A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field Progress in Brain Research 147 2004 249-262
34. H. Weissman & M.T. Banich The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks Neuropsychology 14 2000 41-59
35. K. Yoshizaki & Y. Tsuji Benefits of interhemispheric integration on the Japanese kana script-matching task Perceptual and Motor Skills 20 2000 153-165