Benefits of interhemispheric integration on the Japanese Kana script-matching tasks

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 153-165

  Yoshizaki, Kazuhito ^a   Tsuji, Yayoi ^b  

^a AICHI SHUKUTOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; READING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; READING; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0034136231     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.1.153     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BANICH, M. T. (1995a) Interhemispheric interaction: mechanism of unified processing. In F. L. Kitterle (Ed.), Hemispheric communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 271-300.
2. BANICH, M. T. (1995b) Interhemispheric processing: theoretical considerations and empirical approaches. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdahl (Eds.), Brain asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 427-450.
3. BANICH, M. T., & BELGER, A. (1990) Interhemispheric interaction: how do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex, 26, 77-94.
4. BANICH, M. T., GOERING, S., & BELGER, A. (1990) Interhemispheric processing in left- and right-handers. International Journal of Neuroscience, 54, 197-208.
5. BANICH, M. T., & SHENKER, J. I. (1994) Investigation of interhemispheric processing: methodological considerations. Neuropsychology, 8, 263-277.
6. BELGER, A., & BANICH, M. T. (1992) Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia, 30, 923-929.
7. CLARKE, J. M., & ZAIDEL, E. (1994) Anatomical-behavioral relationships: corpus callosum morphomery and hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research, 64, 185-202.
8. CONEY, J. (1985) Dual hemispheric processing in a letter matching task. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 331-342.
9. DAVIS, R., & SCHMIT, V. (1973) Visual and verbal coding in the interhemispheric transfer of information. Acta Psychologica, 37, 229-240.
10. DIMOND, D. J., & BEAUMONT, G. (1972) Processing in perceptual integration between and within the cerebral hemispheres. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 509-514.
11. EVIATAR, Z. (1995) Reading direction and attention: effects on lateralized ignoring. Brain and Cognition, 29, 137-150.
12. EVIATAR, Z., HELLIGE, J. B., & ZAIDEL, E. (1997) Individual differences in lateralization: effects of gender and handedness. Neuropsychology, 11, 562-576.
13. FARELL, B. (1985) "Same"-"different" judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419-456.
14. HATTA, T., & NAKATSUKA, Z. (1975) H. N. Handedness Inventory. In S. Ohno (Ed.), Papers for celebration of the 63rd birthday of Prof. Ohnishi. Osaka: Osaka City Univer. Press. Pp. 224-247.
15. HATTA, T., & YOSHIZAKI, K. (1996) Interhemispheric co-operation of left- and right-handers in mental calculation tasks. Laterality, 1, 299-313.
16. HATTA, T., & YOSHIZAKI, K. (1997) Effects of task demand on interhemispheric cooperation in mental addition task. Psychologia, 40, 179-191.
17. HERON, W. (1957) Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 38-48.
18. HOPTMAN, M. J., & DAVIDSON, R. J. (1994) How and why do the cerebral hemispheres interact? Psychological Bulletin, 116, 195-219.
19. KRUEGER, L. E. (1978) A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 278-304.
20. KRUEGER, L. E. (1987) Effect of backward masking on same-different judgements. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 375-381.
21. LIEDERMAN, J., MEROLA, J., & MARTINEZ, S. (1985) Interhemispheric collaboration in response to simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia, 23, 673-683.
22. LUDWIG, T. E., & JEEVES, M. A. (1996) Maximizing the bilateral field advantage on verbal and nonverbal matching tasks. Cortex, 32, 131-141.
23. LUDWIG, T. E., JEEVES, M. A., NORMAN, W. D., & DEWITT, R. (1993) The bilateral field advantage on a letter-matching task. Cortex, 29, 691-713.
24. NORMAN, W. D., JEEVES, M. A., MILNE, M., & LUDWIG, T. (1992) Hemispheric interactions: the bilateral advantage and task difficulty. Cortex, 28, 623-642.
25. POSNER, M. I., & MITCHELL, R. F. (1969) Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review, 74, 392-409.
26. SCHMITZ-GIELSDORF, J., WILLMES, K., VONDENHOFF, C., & HARTJE, W. (1998) Effects of spatial arrangement of letter pairs in a name-matching task with unilateral and bilateral hemifield stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 26, 591-602.
27. SERENO, A. B., & KOSSLYN, S. M. (1991) Discrimination within and between hemifields: a new constraint on theories of attention. Neuropsychologia, 29, 659-675.
28. WEISSMAN, D., BANICH, M. T., & PUENTE, E. I. (1998) The across-hemisphere advantage for complex tasks does not depend on directing an input to a hemisphere with a lighter processing load. Poster session presented at the 26th annual meeting of International Neuropsychological Society, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
29. WHITE, M. J. (1969) Laterality differences in perception: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 387-405.