Spatial associations between lotic fish, macroinvertebrate prey and the stream habitat: A multi-scale approach

Boreal Environment Research

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 371-380

  Muotka, Timo ^a   Mäki Petäys, Aki ^b,c   Kreivi, Petri ^b,c   Högmander, Harri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042869002     PISSN: 12396095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allan J.D. 1981. Determinants of diet of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in a mountain stream. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 184-192.
2. Arbia G. 1989. Spatial data configuration in statistical analysis of regional economic and related problems, Kluwer Academic Pbl., London, 256 pp.
3. Bohlin T. 1977. Habitat selection and intercohort competition of juvenile sea-trout Salmo trutta. Oikos 29: 112-117.
4. Cooper S.D., Barmuta L., Samelle O., Kratz K. & Diehl S. 1997. The description of patchiness and its application to the study of biological interactions in streams. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 174-188.
5. Cooper S.D., Diehl, S., Kratz, K. & Sarnelle O. 1998. Implications of scale for patterns and processes in stream ecology. Aust. J. Ecol. 23: 27-40.
6. Cressie N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for spatial data, revised edition. Wiley, New York, 900 pp.
7. Crist T.O. & Wiens J.A. 1994. Scale effects of vegetation on forager movement and seed harvesting by ants. Oikos 69: 37-46.
8. Douglas M. & Lake P.S. 1994. Species richness of stream stones: an investigation of the mechanisms generating the species-area relationship. Oikos 69: 387-396.
9. Dutilleul P. & Legendre P. 1993. Spatial heterogeneity against heteroscedasticity: an ecological paradigm versus a statistical concept. Oikos 66: 152-171.
10. Englund G. & Olsson T. 1997. Treatment effects in a stream fish enclosure experiment: influence of predation rate and prey movements. Oikos 77: 519-528.
11. Forrester G.E. 1994. Diel patterns of drift by five species of mayfly at different levels of fish predation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 2549-2557.
12. Gaudin P. & Caillere L. 1990. Microdistribution of Cottus gobio L. and fry of Salmo trutta L. in a first order stream. Polskie Arch. Hydrobiol. 37: 81-94.
13. Golden Software Inc. 1995. SURFER for Windows, User's Guide. Version 6, Golden Software Inc., Golden, Colorado.
14. Gore J.A. & Nestler J.M. 1988. Instream flow studies in perspective. Regul. Rivers 2: 93-101.
15. Grant J.W.A. & Noakes D.L.G. 1986. A test of a size-selective predation model with juvenile brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. J. Fish. Biol. 29 (Suppl. A): 15-23.
16. Harvey B.C. & Stewart A. J. 1991. Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams. Oecologia 87: 336-342.
17. Heggenes J. 1989. Physical habitat selection by brown trout (Salmo trutta) in riverine systems. Nordic J. Freshwat. Res. 64: 74-90.
18. Heggenes J., Brabrand Å & Saltveit S.J. 1990. Comparison of three methods for studies of stream habitat use by young brown trout and Atlantic salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 119: 101-111.
19. Hoekstra D. & Janssen J. 1985. Non-visual feeding behavior of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi, in Lake Michigan. Environ. Biol. Fishes 12: 111-117.
20. Horne J.K. & Schneider D.C. 1994. Analysis of scale-dependent processes with dimensionless ratios. Oikos 70: 201-211.
21. Huusko A. & Korhonen P. 1993. Population densities of young stages of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in the Oulankajoki river system. Oulanka Reports 12: 125-127.
22. Levin S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943-1967.
23. Mäki-Petäys A., Muotka T., Huusko A., Tikkanen P. & Kreivi P. 1997. Seasonal changes in habitat use and preference by juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in a northern boreal river. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 520-530.
24. McIntosh A.R. & Townsend C.R. 1995. Contrasting predation risks presented by introduced brown trout and native common galaxias in New Zealand streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52: 1821-1833.
25. McLain D.H. 1974. Drawing contours from arbitrary data points. Comp. J. 17: 318-324.
26. Moyle P.E. & Baltz D.M. 1985. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of California stream fishes: developing criteria for instream flow determinations. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 114: 695-704.
27. Muotka T. & Penttinen A. 1994. Detecting small-scale spatial patterns in lotic predator-prey relationships: statistical methods and a case study. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 2210-2218.
28. Newman R.M. & Waters T.F. 1984. Size selective predation on Gammarus pseudolimnaeus by trout and sculpins. Ecology 65: 1535-1545.
29. Openshaw S. & Taylor P.J. 1979. A million or so of correlated coefficients: three experiments on the modifiable unit problem. In: Wringley N. (ed.), Statistical applications in the spatial sciences, Pion, London.
30. Orth D.J. 1987. Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow-habitat models. Reg. Rivers 1: 171-181.
31. Pannatier Y. 1994. VarioWin 2.1. Institute of Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
32. Peckarsky B.L. & Penton M.A. 1985. Is predaceous stonefly behavior affected by competition? Ecology 66: 1717-1728.
33. Power M. 1987. Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate and tropical streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. In: Kerfoot W.C. & Sih A. (eds.), Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp. 333-351.
34. Rossi R.E., Mulla D.J., Journel A.G. & Franz, A.H. 1992. Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 277-314.
35. Sih A. 1984. The behavioral response race between predator and prey. Am. Nat. 123: 143-150.
36. SYSTAT Inc. 1992. SYSTAT for Windows: Graphics, Version 5. Evanston, Illinois.
37. Tippets W.E. & Moyle P.B. 1978. Epibenthic feeding by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in the McCloud River, California. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 549-559.
38. Tikkanen P., Muotka T. & Huhta, A. 1994. Predator detection and avoidance by lotic mayfly nymphs of different size. Oecologia 99: 252-259.
39. Underwood A.J. & Chapman M.G. 1996. Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia 107: 212-224.
40. Wiens J.A. & Milne B.T. 1989. Scaling of 'landscapes' in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective. Landscape Ecol. 3: 87-96.
41. With K.A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecol. 9: 25-36.