The prevalence of asymmetrical indirect effects in two-host-one-parasitoid systems

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 71-82

  Brassil, Chad E ^a   Abrams, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amensalism; Apparent competition; Mutualism; Predation; Shared enemy

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HOST-PARASITOID INTERACTION; PARASITE PREVALENCE; PARASITOID;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FOOD CHAIN; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; PARASITE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; FOOD CHAIN; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PARASITES; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 3042847442     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abrams P.A. Indirect interactions between species that share a predator. varieties of indirect effects Kerfoot W.C., Sih A. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. 1987;38-54 University Press of New England, Dartmouth, NH
2. Abrams P.A. Is predator-mediated coexistence possible in unstable systems? Ecology. 80:1999;608-621
3. Abrams P.A. Character shifts of prey species that share predators. Am. Nat. 156:2000;S45-S61
4. Abrams P.A. Effects of altered resource consumption rates by one consumer species on a competitor. Ecol. Lett. 6:2003;550-555
5. Abrams P.A., Chen X. The evolution of traits affecting resource acquisition and predator vulnerability. character displacement under real and apparent competition Am. Nat. 160:2002;692-704
6. Abrams P.A., Kawecki T.J. Adaptive host preference and the dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions. Theor. Popul. Biol. 56:1999;307-324
7. Abrams P.A., Matsuda H. Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predators. Ecology. 77:1996;610-616
8. Abrams P.A., Holt R.D., Roth J.D. Apparent competition or apparent mutualism? shared predation when populations cycle. Ecology. 79:1998;201-212
9. Balciunas D., Lawler S.P. Effects of basal resources, predation, and alternative prey in microcosm food-chains. Ecology. 76:1995;1327-1336
10. Beddington J.R., Free C.A., Lawton J.H. Dynamic complexity in predator-prey models framed in difference equations. Nature. 255:1975;58-60
11. Beddington J.R., Free C.A., Lawton J.H. Concepts of stability and resilience in predator-prey models. J. Animal Ecol. 47:1976;791-816
12. Bonsall M.B., Hassell M.P. Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages. Nature. 388:1997;371-373
13. Bonsall M.B., Hassell M.P. Population dynamics of apparent competition in a host-parasitoid assemblage. J. Anim. Ecol. 67:1998;918-929
14. Brown J.S., Morgan R.A. Effects of foraging behavior and spatial scale on diet selectivity - a test with fox squirrels. Oikos. 74:1995;122-136
15. Chaneton E.J., Bonsall M.B. Enemy-mediated apparent competition. empirical patterns and the evidence Oikos. 88:2000;380-394
16. Chesson P. Stochastic population models. Kolasa J., Pickett S.T.A. Ecological Heterogeneity. 1991;123-143 Springer, New York
17. Cohen J.E., Briand F., Newman C.M. Community Food Webs. Data and Theory:1990;Springer, New York
18. Connell J.H. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition-evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122:1983;661-696
19. Denno R.F., Mcclure M.S., Ott J.R. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects - competition reexamined and resurrected. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 40:1995;297-331
20. Grosholz E.D. Interactions of intraspecific, interspecific, and apparent competition with host-pathogen population dynamics. Ecology. 73:1992;507-514
21. Gurevitch J., Morrow L.L., Wallace A., Walsh J.S. A metaanalysis of competition in field experiments. Am. Nat. 140:1992;539-572
22. Hassell M.P. The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Host-parasitoid Interactions. 2000;Oxford University Press, Oxford
23. Holt R.D. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 12:1977;197-229
24. Holt R.D. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. Am. Nat. 124:1984;377-406
25. Holt R.D., Barfield M. Impacts of temporal variation on apparent competition and coexistence in open ecosystems. Oikos. 101:2003;49-58
26. Holt R.D., Kotler B.P. Short-term apparent competition. Am. Nat. 130:1987;412-430
27. Holt R.D., Lawton J.H. Apparent competition and enemy-free space in insect host-parasitoid communities. Am. Nat. 142:1993;623-645
28. Holt R.D., Lawton J.H. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:1994;495-520
29. Kaitala V., Ylikarjula J., Heino M. Dynamic complexities in host-parasitoid interaction. J. Theor. Biol. 197:1999;331-341
30. Kotler B.P., Gross J.E., Mitchell W.A. Applying patch use to assess aspects of foraging behavior in Nubian Ibex. J. Wildl. Manage. 58:1994;299-307
31. Lawton J.H., Hassell M.P. Asymmetrical competition in insects. Nature. 289:1981;793-795
32. Lima S.L. Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions - what are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? Bioscience. 48:1998;25-34
33. Marvier M.A. Parasite impacts on host communities. plant parasitism in a California coastal prairie Ecology. 79:1998;2616-2623
34. May R.M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. 1973;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
35. May R.M., Hassell M.P., Anderson R.M., Tonkyn D.W. Density dependence in host-parasitoid models. J. Anim. Ecol. 50:1981;855-865
36. Muller C.B., Adriaanse I.C.T., Belshaw R., Godfray H.C.J. The structure of an aphid-parasitoid community. J. Anim. Ecol. 68:1999;346-370
37. Murdoch W.W., Briggs C.J., Nisbet R.M. Consumer-Resource Dynamics. 2003;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
38. Nicholson, A.J.,, Bailey, V.A., 1935. The balance of animal populations, Part I. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, pp. 551-598.
39. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in C. the Art of Scientific Computing:1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
40. Schmidt K.A., Whelan C.J. Predator-mediated interactions between and within guilds of nesting songbirds. experimental and observational evidence Am. Nat. 152:1998;393-402
41. Schoener T.W. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122:1983;240-285
42. Schoener T.W. On the relative importance of direct versus indirect effects in ecological communities. Kawanabe H., Cohen J.E., Iwasaki K. Mutualism and Community Organization: Behavioural, Theoretical, and Food-Web Approaches. 1993;365-411 Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Settle W.H., Wilson L.T. Invasion by the variegated leafhopper and biotic interactions. parasitism, competition, and apparent competition Ecology. 71:1990;1461-1470
44. Turchin P. Population regulation. a synthetic view Oikos. 84:1999;153-159
45. Wolfram Research, 1999. Mathematica 4.0. Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL.
46. Wootton J.T. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:1994;443-466
47. Yodzis P. Diffuse effects in food webs. Ecology. 81:2000;261-266