|
Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 16-21
|
Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DISEASE DURATION;
DIURESIS;
DRAIN;
ENDOPYELOPLASTY;
ENDOPYELOTOMY;
EVALUATION;
EXTRAVASATION;
FEASIBILITY STUDY;
FEMALE;
FEVER;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INCISION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
MALE;
OPERATION DURATION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RENOGRAPHY;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
STENOSIS;
STENT;
SURGICAL PATIENT;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SUTURING METHOD;
SYMPTOM;
URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;
URINARY TRACT SURGERY;
URINOMA;
UROGRAPHY;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ENDOSCOPY;
FEASIBILITY STUDIES;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
KIDNEY PELVIS;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
STENTS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URETER;
URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;
|
EID: 3042785605
PISSN: 00904295
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.031 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (51)
|
References (9)
|